本文選題：林語堂 + 歐化白話文　； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：提到白話文運(yùn)動,我們自然而然地會想到胡適、魯迅,而事實上林語堂在白話文運(yùn)動的初期也是得力戰(zhàn)將之一,但在文學(xué)史上他卻飽受爭議,原因之一是其白話文及文章觀念在1930年代的重大轉(zhuǎn)變。本文主要圍繞這一重大轉(zhuǎn)變進(jìn)行討論,分析其轉(zhuǎn)變之原因,以及轉(zhuǎn)變之后的理論和實踐的矛盾,文章主要分為林語堂與白話文運(yùn)動、林語堂與歐化白話文、林語堂對白話文的實踐三個部分,來分析林語堂對白話文的態(tài)度以及他在白話文運(yùn)動中的位子,探討林語堂對歐化白話進(jìn)行反思、由積極推進(jìn)白話文運(yùn)動轉(zhuǎn)而提倡“語錄體”的原因,通過對其創(chuàng)作及翻譯實踐的分析,論述其“語錄體”主張的不可操作性以及理論主張與創(chuàng)作實踐的不一致性。本文將采用文本細(xì)讀、材料分析、史料搜集、歸納總結(jié)等研究方法,并結(jié)合歷史學(xué)、語言學(xué)知識對林語堂的創(chuàng)作和翻譯實踐進(jìn)行細(xì)致的分析。文章分為三部分:第一部分,主要對白話、白話文、歐化白話文的概念進(jìn)行界定,同時分析白話與白話文,歐化與白話文的關(guān)系;對林語堂在新文化運(yùn)動前后的言論和實踐的梳理,厘清林語堂在白話文運(yùn)動中的位子及態(tài)度。第二部分,梳理林語堂在新文化運(yùn)動前期對歐化白話文的創(chuàng)作實踐,主要從主語增加、句子延長等五個部分來分析林語堂早期(1933年以前)創(chuàng)作中明顯的歐化傾向;分析林語堂由積極推進(jìn)白話文運(yùn)動到反思?xì)W化白話文進(jìn)而轉(zhuǎn)向提倡“語錄體”的原因。第三部分,通過對其1933年后創(chuàng)作及翻譯作品的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)其翻譯以及語錄體的創(chuàng)作實踐依然有明顯的歐化特征;他所提倡的語錄體只不過是有古意的歐化白話,他倡導(dǎo)的語錄體并非真正幽默、性靈,只有閑適,從而論述其“語錄體”主張在三十年代只是“攪局而已”。
[Abstract]:When it comes to the vernacular movement, it's natural to think of Hu Shi Lu Xun, and in fact Lin Yutang was one of the most successful men in the early days of the vernacular movement, but he was controversial in the history of literature. One reason is that its vernacular and literary ideas changed significantly in the 1930 s. This paper mainly discusses this important change, analyzes the reason of the change, and the contradiction between theory and practice after the transformation. The article is divided into Lin Yutang and vernacular movement, Lin Yutang and Europeanization vernacular writing. Three parts of Lin Yutang's practice of vernacular Chinese, to analyze Lin Yutang's attitude to vernacular and his position in vernacular movement, and to discuss Lin Yutang's reflection on Europeanized vernacular. From actively promoting the vernacular language movement to advocating the "quotation style", through the analysis of its creation and translation practice, this paper discusses the inoperability of its "quotation style" and the inconsistency between the theoretical proposition and the creative practice. In this paper, we will adopt the methods of text reading, material analysis, historical data collection, summary and so on, and make a detailed analysis of Lin Yutang's creation and translation practice with the knowledge of history and linguistics. The article is divided into three parts: the first part, mainly defines the concepts of vernacular, Europeanization vernacular, at the same time analyzes the relationship between vernacular and vernacular, Europeanization and vernacular; Combing the speech and practice of Lin Yutang before and after the New Culture Movement, the author clarifies the position and attitude of Lin Yutang in the vernacular language Movement. The second part, combing Lin Yutang's writing practice of Europeanized vernacular writing in the early stage of the New Cultural Movement, mainly analyzes the obvious Europeanization tendency in Lin Yutang's early (before 1933) creation from five parts: the increase of subject and the extension of sentence. This paper analyzes the reasons why Lin Yutang changed from actively promoting the vernacular movement to introspecting the Europeanized vernacular and then to advocating the "quotation style". In the third part, through the analysis of his creation and translation after 1933, it is found that his translation and the writing practice of the quotations still have obvious characteristics of Europeanization, and the quotations he advocates are only Europeanized vernacular with ancient meanings. The quotations he advocated were not really humorous, spiritual, but casual, so he argued that his quotation was only "stirring up the situation" in the 1930s.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I206.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮智強(qiáng);;林語堂“另一捆矛盾”的多維解讀——從支持“白話文”到反對“歐化文”[J];邵陽學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年06期

2 王本朝;;歐化白話文:在質(zhì)疑與試驗中成長[J];文學(xué)評論;2014年06期

3 王本朝;;白話文的說理優(yōu)勢:以朱自清的論說文體為中心[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2014年06期

4 王本朝;;白話文運(yùn)動中的文章觀念[J];中國社會科學(xué);2013年07期

5 彭春凌;;林語堂與現(xiàn)代中國的語文運(yùn)動[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年02期

6 余娜;;論林語堂早期語言學(xué)研究與新文化運(yùn)動[J];南昌航空大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

7 陳欣欣;;論林語堂的白話文語言觀與文學(xué)觀[J];中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)研究叢刊;2012年05期

8 胡全章;;清末白話文運(yùn)動之理論建樹[J];山西師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

9 趙炎秋;;近現(xiàn)代文白之爭及其反思[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年05期

10 丁曉原;;“五四白話”與現(xiàn)代散文文體建構(gòu)[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2011年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉茉琳;論晚清至“五四”的白話文運(yùn)作[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳思思;林語堂與1930年代小品文[D];華東師范大學(xué);2014年

2 李s，

本文編號：1942770