發(fā)布時間：2018-03-19 18:44

  本文選題：保薦制度　切入點：保薦人　出處：《武漢理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：保薦制度是旨在規(guī)范上市公司信息披露行為的制度安排,對證券市場的健康發(fā)展意義重大。作為破解我國中小型企業(yè)融資困境的重要手段,中小板、創(chuàng)業(yè)板等市場發(fā)揮的作用也日益深遠。然而,在具體實踐過程中,我國的保薦制度在保薦機構與保薦代表人權責分配等方面出現(xiàn)了一些問題,給投資者埋下了巨大隱患,也使得我國現(xiàn)行保薦制度面臨現(xiàn)實拷問。從海外實踐來看,英國、美國、香港等地區(qū)已在保薦制度安排上積累了重要經(jīng)驗,這為我國推進保薦制度建設提供了寶貴的借鑒價值,但必須認識到,保薦制度要從基本國情出發(fā),因地制宜地進行合理設計,只有如此才能使創(chuàng)設保薦制度的預期目的得以實現(xiàn)。本文正是以此為邏輯起點,在回顧了我國現(xiàn)行保薦制度運行狀況的基礎上,通過構建動態(tài)博弈模型,嘗試找出保薦制度相關問題滋生的制度根源,同時也寄望于根據(jù)博弈模型的均衡分析結(jié)果,為證券監(jiān)管部門在改革和完善保薦制度的進程中提供一些合理的建議。 本文在第一部分著重論述了選題的背景和意義,并對國內(nèi)外相關研究文獻進行了系統(tǒng)梳理,并從中為本文的寫作奠定了邏輯起點；第二部分則在介紹了保薦制度基本內(nèi)容的基礎上,以制度經(jīng)濟學為主要依托,探究了保薦制度的制度起源,并對保薦制度的基本特征和制度價值進行了全面論述；第三部分對我國現(xiàn)行保薦制度的運行狀況進行了較為系統(tǒng)的剖析,并從中挖掘出了我國保薦制度亟待解決的三個主要問題,即違規(guī)識別、違規(guī)責任劃分和違規(guī)處罰三方面的問題；第四部分是本文的比較分析部分,筆者在介紹美國、英國和香港各自采用的保薦制度后,從監(jiān)管機構作用、制度實施范圍和雙重制三個方面總結(jié)了我國保薦制度的主要不同點；第五部分是本文的創(chuàng)新點和重點所在,本部分主要運用了博弈論的研究方法,通過構建和分析IPO申報與審核的博弈模型,找出了影響發(fā)行申報與審核過程中的參與方?jīng)Q策的主要因素,進而為監(jiān)管機構的最優(yōu)監(jiān)管策略提供了參考依據(jù);第六部分則是以博弈分析的基本結(jié)論為依據(jù),嘗試性地為我國現(xiàn)行保薦制度的進一步完善提出了若干建議,本文認為,只有從提高保薦人的準入資格、建立督導期更長的信息跟蹤監(jiān)督制度、完善保薦人的責任追究機制、促成“保薦單保制”以及推行強制責任保險制度這五個方面著手,才能深入挖掘保薦制度的制度效能；在本文的第七部分,筆者對論文的主要結(jié)論進行了回顧,同時也歸納和總結(jié)了本文的創(chuàng)新之處以及進一步研究的方向。
[Abstract]:The recommendation system is a system arrangement aimed at standardizing the information disclosure behavior of listed companies, which is of great significance to the healthy development of the securities market. However, in the concrete practice process, the recommendation system of our country has some problems in the distribution of the rights and responsibilities between the sponsor organization and the sponsor representative, which has laid a huge hidden danger to the investors. From overseas practice, Britain, the United States, Hong Kong and other regions have accumulated important experience in the arrangements of the sponsorship system, which has provided valuable reference value for our country to promote the construction of the sponsorship system. However, we must realize that the sponsor system should be reasonably designed according to the basic national conditions, and only in this way can the expected purpose of establishing the sponsorship system be realized. This paper takes this as the logical starting point. On the basis of reviewing the current operating conditions of the sponsor system in China, this paper attempts to find out the institutional root of the problems related to the sponsorship system by constructing a dynamic game model, and at the same time hopes to find out the results of the equilibrium analysis according to the game model. It provides some reasonable suggestions for the securities supervision department in the process of reforming and perfecting the recommendation system. In the first part of this paper, the background and significance of the topic are discussed, and the related research literature at home and abroad is systematically combed, which lays a logical starting point for the writing of this paper. In the second part, on the basis of introducing the basic contents of the recommendation system, based on the institutional economics, the author probes into the origin of the sponsorship system, and comprehensively discusses the basic characteristics and the system value of the sponsorship system. The third part has carried on the comparatively systematic analysis to our country present sponsor system movement condition, and has excavated out our country sponsor system urgently needs to be solved three main problems, namely the violation identification, The 4th part is the comparative analysis part of this paper. After introducing the recommendation system adopted by the United States, Britain and Hong Kong, the author starts with the role of the regulatory body. Three aspects of system implementation scope and dual system summarized the main differences of the sponsorship system in China. Part 5th is the innovation and focus of this paper, this part mainly uses the research methods of game theory. By constructing and analyzing the game model of IPO declaration and auditing, this paper finds out the main factors that affect the decision of the participants in the process of issuing declaration and auditing, and then provides a reference for the optimal regulatory strategy of the regulatory body. The 6th part is based on the basic conclusion of the game analysis, and puts forward some suggestions for the further improvement of the current sponsor system in our country. Only by establishing the information tracking and supervising system with a longer supervision period, perfecting the accountability mechanism of the sponsor, promoting the "recommendation order guarantee system" and carrying out the compulsory liability insurance system, can the system efficiency of the recommendation system be excavated deeply; In the 7th part of this paper, the author reviews the main conclusions of the paper, and summarizes the innovation of this paper as well as the direction of further research.
【學位授予單位】：武漢理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 寧文昕;;基于現(xiàn)行保薦制度下創(chuàng)業(yè)板股票發(fā)行監(jiān)管的博弈分析[J];山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年02期

2 黎元奎;過度介入與適度退出:中國證券市場政府行為分析[J];上海金融;2005年07期

3 劉惠萍;;我國創(chuàng)業(yè)板IPO保薦模式差異及其監(jiān)管部門角色因應[J];改革;2011年05期

4 尹蘅;基于博弈論的保薦人制度研究[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學;2005年12期

5 吳淑琨,陳代云;IPO價值信息傳遞與投資銀行金融認證[J];證券市場導報;2005年06期

6 盧文道;我國證券市場行政許可制度之重構[J];證券市場導報;2005年10期

7 黃春鈴;陳崢嶸;;IPO市場承銷商聲譽機制的形成機理及實證檢驗[J];證券市場導報;2007年02期

8 張璇;汪源;;我國股票發(fā)行保薦制的制度缺陷及其完善[J];中國證券期貨;2010年08期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 梁化軍;中國證券發(fā)行監(jiān)管的制度變遷：理論模型與績效檢視[D];吉林大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1635535