本文關(guān)鍵詞： 上市公司 增發(fā)新股 公開增發(fā) 定向增發(fā) 經(jīng)營績效　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：增發(fā)這一再融資方式自誕生起,就注定成為再融資市場的焦點,特別是在定向增發(fā)方式被引進(jìn)后,增發(fā)再融資迅猛發(fā)展,已經(jīng)成為我國資本市場上最重要的再融資方式。面對狂熱的“增發(fā)熱潮”,社會及學(xué)術(shù)界必然會將目光投向增發(fā)對上市公司經(jīng)營績效的影響之上。 通過對研究文獻(xiàn)的回顧發(fā)現(xiàn),國外學(xué)者對于增發(fā)新股是否能夠有效改善上市公司的經(jīng)營績效這一問題看法不一,實證結(jié)果也說明了上市公司的經(jīng)營績效在增發(fā)新股后上升或下降的兩種情況都可能發(fā)生。而國內(nèi)大部分研究證明增發(fā)再融資對公司的業(yè)績有負(fù)面影響,但實證研究的樣本主要集中在股權(quán)分置改革(2006)以前。股權(quán)分置改革后,雖然也有學(xué)者采用了實證研究的方法,但是他們的研究樣本或數(shù)據(jù)較少,研究方法也多數(shù)選取單個指標(biāo)進(jìn)行簡單的前后比較或是使用較常用的多元回歸分析。此外,自2006年定向增發(fā)被引進(jìn)中國再融資市場,關(guān)于上市公司增發(fā)后的績效問題,國內(nèi)學(xué)者至今少有將公開增發(fā)和定向增發(fā)進(jìn)行對比研究的,已有的研究也幾乎全是針對公開增發(fā)和定向增發(fā)的短期市場表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行研究,少有人研究公開增發(fā)和定向增發(fā)的長期經(jīng)營績效。 為了克服上述研究方法的缺陷,本文分析了公開增發(fā)和定向增發(fā)對于公司治理的影響差異,并以股權(quán)分置改革后我國證券市場2006-2010年間成功實施增發(fā)的268家A股上市公司為研究樣本,選取若干個財務(wù)指標(biāo),通過因子分析法構(gòu)造一個經(jīng)營績效的綜合得分函數(shù),計算出實施了增發(fā)的上市公司在不同年度的得分,然后做前后比較,檢驗增發(fā)前后經(jīng)營績效變化情況。通過對總體樣本和按增發(fā)類型分類樣本的綜合分析,得出以下結(jié)論：股權(quán)分置改革后,上市公司增發(fā)后的經(jīng)營績效逐年緩慢改善。從長期來看,增發(fā)確實對上市公司的經(jīng)營績效起到提升作用,而定向增發(fā)比公開增發(fā)更能提升上市公司的經(jīng)營績效。 結(jié)合研究結(jié)論和市場實際,本文得出以下幾點啟示：(1)再融資市場的制度設(shè)計應(yīng)注重遵循激勵相容原則：(2)上市公司選擇性地定向增發(fā)新股融資應(yīng)得到鼓勵；(3)應(yīng)加強(qiáng)對上市公司定向增發(fā)新股再融資的監(jiān)管,包括增發(fā)新股的行為、鎖定期和通過定向增發(fā)實現(xiàn)并購時控股股東注入資產(chǎn)的評估結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:Since the birth of the repeated financing method of additional issuance, it has been destined to become the focus of the refinancing market, especially after the introduction of the method of directional additional issuance, the rapid development of additional issuance and refinancing. It has become the most important refinancing method in the capital market of our country. In the face of the frenzied "IPO craze", the society and the academic circles will inevitably pay attention to the influence of the additional offering on the operating performance of the listed company. Through the review of the research literature, it is found that foreign scholars have different views on whether the IPO can effectively improve the operating performance of listed companies. The empirical results also show that the operating performance of listed companies may rise or decline after the issuance of new shares, and most of the domestic studies prove that refinancing has a negative impact on the performance of the company. However, the sample of empirical research is mainly before the reform of split share structure (2006). After the reform of split share structure, although some scholars have adopted the method of empirical research, their research samples or data are relatively small. Most of the research methods also select a single index to carry out simple back and forth comparison or use more commonly used multiple regression analysis. In addition, since 2006, the directional placement has been introduced into the Chinese refinancing market, about the performance of the listed companies after the IPO. Up to now, few domestic scholars have made a comparative study of public and directional additional offerings, and the existing studies have almost all focused on the short-term market performance of public additional offerings and targeted additional offerings. Few people study the long-term performance of public issuance and private placement. In order to overcome the defects of the above research methods, this paper analyzes the differences of the effects of public and directional additional offerings on corporate governance. Taking 268 A-share listed companies which successfully implemented additional issuance in China's securities market from 2006 to 2010 after the reform of split share structure as the research sample and selecting several financial indexes, a comprehensive score function of operating performance is constructed by factor analysis. To calculate the scores of listed companies with additional issuance in different years, and then to compare before and after, to test the changes of business performance before and after the increase. Through the comprehensive analysis of the total samples and the classification samples according to the type of additional issuance, The following conclusions are drawn: after the reform of split share structure, the operating performance of the listed companies after additional issuance improves slowly year by year. In the long run, the additional issuance does improve the operating performance of the listed companies. But the directional additional offering can improve the operating performance of the listed company more than the public offering. Combining the conclusions of the research with the market reality, This paper draws the following conclusions: 1) the system design of the refinancing market should pay attention to follow the principle of incentive compatibility: 2) the listed companies should be encouraged to raise the new shares selectively) and the supervision of the refinancing of the new shares should be strengthened. It includes the behavior of issuing new shares, locking time and the evaluation result of controlling shareholder's injection of assets when the acquisition is realized through directional issuance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F275;F832.51;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李雪;吳振信;;增發(fā)新股對我國上市公司股價走勢影響分析[J];北方工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年01期

2 李夢軍,陸靜;上市公司增發(fā)新股信息與股票價格波動的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2001年04期

3 唐黎軍;定向增發(fā)——外資并購的創(chuàng)新性路徑選擇[J];南方金融;2004年01期

4 馮根福,吳林江;我國上市公司并購績效的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年01期

5 陸正飛,葉康濤;中國上市公司股權(quán)融資偏好解析——偏好股權(quán)融資就是緣于融資成本低嗎?[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年04期

6 王美今,孫建軍;中國股市收益、收益波動與投資者情緒[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年10期

7 胡乃武,閻衍,張海峰;增發(fā)融資的股價效應(yīng)與市場前景[J];金融研究;2002年05期

8 劉力,王汀汀,王震;中國A股上市公司增發(fā)公告的負(fù)價格效應(yīng)及其二元股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)解釋[J];金融研究;2003年08期

9 王亞平;楊云紅;毛小元;;上市公司選擇股票增發(fā)的時間嗎?——中國市場股權(quán)融資之謎的一種解釋[J];金融研究;2006年12期

10 余麗霞;趙根;;我國上市公司定向增發(fā)的財務(wù)效應(yīng)研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2011年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 朱為繹;上市公司增發(fā)前后會計業(yè)績變化及其影響因素分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2005年

2 張云建;我國上市公司增發(fā)新股再融資與公司經(jīng)營績效實證研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

3 劉新常;上市公司增發(fā)融資效率研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

4 馬偉麗;再融資及其對我國上市公司經(jīng)營業(yè)績的影響研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

5 謝海琴;海爾集團(tuán)流程信息化再造研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2010年

6 魯婉瓊;我國上市公司定向增發(fā)與公共增發(fā)新股融資股東財富效應(yīng)的實證研究[D];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1520635