【摘要】：最近幾年來，隨著我國社會的不斷發(fā)展，社會地位的不斷提高，我國的公益組織在社會發(fā)展過程中持續(xù)改進(jìn)，對促進(jìn)社會進(jìn)步有了明顯的成果。然而隨著近些年某明星詐捐門事件及“郭美美事件”等一系列丑聞的發(fā)生，這對公益組織的可信度是一個很大的挑戰(zhàn)。公益組織也揭示了一些問題，公信力受到強(qiáng)大的沖擊。因此，怎樣有效地提高公益組織的公信力，這個問題是迫切需要解決的。本文旨在社會公眾的監(jiān)督視角下確立一套科學(xué)可行的公益組織績效評價指標(biāo)體系，有利于幫助公益組織發(fā)現(xiàn)不足，有利于對公益組織的公信力重塑補救，有利于對公益組織進(jìn)行有效評價，有利于使公益組織走向健康、快速發(fā)展的道路。 本篇論文從對公益組織及其績效評價的基本概念著手，深入介紹了我國公益組織發(fā)展及其績效評價的現(xiàn)狀，，以及我國公益組織績效評價存在問題的具體表現(xiàn)。同時在現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上，比較全面地分析公益組織績效評價存在問題的主要原因，進(jìn)而建立一套科學(xué)、合理、完善的績效評價指標(biāo)體系，在已有維度的基礎(chǔ)上又增加了兩個具有針對性的誠信和公開透明維度，并運用模糊綜合分析法對其分析評價。根據(jù)已構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)評價體系，結(jié)合中國紅十字這一案例，以其為研究對象進(jìn)行調(diào)查收集相關(guān)的數(shù)據(jù)資料，并收集整理的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行深入分析，從各個指標(biāo)維度入手，考核評價中國紅十字會的績效，最后對比分析每一個指標(biāo)維度的得分情況。同時借鑒一些其他國家基金會建設(shè)的成功經(jīng)驗，分析得出紅十字會誠信和公開透明這兩個指標(biāo)績效相對較弱，同時針對較弱的指標(biāo)提出相應(yīng)的建議和策略，以便更好更有效地提高自身的不足，來重塑和提升中國紅十字會的公信力。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of our society and the continuous improvement of the social status, the public welfare organizations in our country continue to improve in the process of social development, which has made obvious achievements in promoting social progress. However, with the occurrence of a series of scandals, such as the fraud of a star donor and the Guo Meimei incident in recent years, it is a great challenge to the credibility of the public welfare organizations. Public welfare organizations have also revealed a number of problems, the credibility of the strong impact. Therefore, how to effectively improve the credibility of public welfare organizations, this problem is urgently needed to be resolved. The aim of this paper is to establish a scientific and feasible index system for evaluating the performance of public welfare organizations from the angle of supervision of the public, which is helpful to help the public welfare organizations to find out the deficiencies and to rebuild and remedy the credibility of the public welfare organizations. It is conducive to the effective evaluation of public welfare organizations and to the road of healthy and rapid development of public welfare organizations. This paper starts with the basic concept of the public welfare organization and its performance evaluation, and introduces the present situation of the development and performance evaluation of the public welfare organization in China, as well as the concrete manifestation of the problems existing in the performance evaluation of the public welfare organization in our country. At the same time, on the basis of the present situation, this paper analyzes the main reasons of the problems existing in the performance evaluation of public welfare organizations, and then establishes a set of scientific, reasonable and perfect index system of performance evaluation. On the basis of the existing dimensions, two more targeted dimensions of good faith and open transparency are added, and the fuzzy comprehensive analysis method is used to analyze and evaluate them. According to the index evaluation system that has been constructed, combined with the case of the Red Cross of China, this paper investigates and collects the relevant data, and collects and collates the data for in-depth analysis, starting from the dimensions of each index. Assess and evaluate the performance of the Red Cross Society of China, and finally compare and analyze the score of each index dimension. At the same time, drawing lessons from the successful experience of the foundation construction in some other countries, the paper draws a conclusion that the two indicators of Red Cross honesty and openness are relatively weak in performance, and at the same time put forward corresponding suggestions and strategies for the weaker indicators. In order to better and more effective improvement of their own shortcomings, to restore and enhance the credibility of the Red Cross Society of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D632.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱宇;;非營利組織財務(wù)績效模糊綜合評價研究——基于我國青少年發(fā)展基金會的分析[J];財會通訊;2009年25期

2 李蘭英;蘇軍毅;;對政府支出績效評價“3E”標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的評析[J];財會月刊;2007年12期

3 張川;潘飛;;國內(nèi)外綜合業(yè)績評價體系的研究評述[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2008年04期

4 曾韶華;林琳;;非營利組織的績效評價體系研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年05期

5 胡楊成;;基于主成分分析的非營利組織績效模糊綜合評價[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年10期

6 仲偉周;曹永利;Shunfeng SONG;;我國非營利組織的績效考核指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計研究[J];科研管理;2006年03期

7 高雷;張婷;;非營利組織績效預(yù)算評價指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];西南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

8 蔡玉鳳;唐恒書;;淺析非營利組織績效評價[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2013年01期

9 臧紅雨;馬文婷;文香;;基于公信力危機(jī)的公益性非營利組織治理和績效評價體系研究[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2013年08期

10 高向麗;;我國非營利組織績效測評指標(biāo)體系研究[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年02期

本文編號：2439505