發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-15 16:16

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代規(guī)劃國(guó)家下,高度發(fā)展的社會(huì)分工和不斷加劇的利益多元,已使國(guó)家與社會(huì)呈現(xiàn)交互影響的復(fù)雜過(guò)程。據(jù)此,基于傳統(tǒng)干預(yù)國(guó)家而發(fā)展出的處理國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系的單邊原則也應(yīng)由雙邊或是合作原則所替代。合作原則首先可以理解為對(duì)國(guó)家與經(jīng)濟(jì)之間的相互影響、共同設(shè)定目標(biāo)、共同致力于目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)的協(xié)作過(guò)程的事實(shí)確認(rèn);其次也能夠理解為一種形成性原則,從這一原則出發(fā),會(huì)衍生出許多與規(guī)劃國(guó)家相符的新的行為方式和法律制度。最后,在合作概念的背后還隱藏了國(guó)家與社會(huì)的規(guī)范模式,這種模式又為新的經(jīng)濟(jì)憲法提供了基本指導(dǎo)。在合作原則之下,傳統(tǒng)國(guó)家演變?yōu)樯鐣?huì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)權(quán)力的承擔(dān)者共同服務(wù)于公共目標(biāo),公共任務(wù)得以合作完成的合作國(guó)家,而社會(huì)同樣演變?yōu)樯鐣?huì)成員逐漸擺脫了利己主義的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)原則,對(duì)公共福祉負(fù)有協(xié)作義務(wù),對(duì)共同體承擔(dān)責(zé)任的合作化的多元主義社會(huì)。合作化的多元主義社會(huì)和合作國(guó)家并未改變社會(huì)與國(guó)家之間不混同和不同一原則,而是對(duì)國(guó)家與社會(huì)之間互相滲透、交錯(cuò)影響這一綜合過(guò)程的全新描述。國(guó)家與社會(huì)的合作同樣對(duì)憲法學(xué)理提出重大挑戰(zhàn),憲法學(xué)理必須接受現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展,并在國(guó)家目標(biāo)條款中對(duì)之予以體系化建構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:In modern planning countries, the highly developed social division of labor and the increasing diversity of interests have led to a complex process of interaction between the state and society. In order to confirm the facts of the collaborative process of setting goals and working together to achieve the goals, the interaction between the state and the economy can be understood as a formative principle, from which many new ways of behavior and legal systems consistent with the planned state can be derived. Under the cooperative principle, the traditional state has evolved into a cooperative state in which the social and economic power bearers serve the public goals together, the public tasks can be accomplished cooperatively, and the society has also evolved into a cooperative state in which the members of the society gradually get rid of it. The principle of self-interest in competition is a cooperative pluralistic society with a duty to cooperate in public welfare and a responsibility to the community. The cooperative pluralistic society and cooperative states have not changed the principle of indistinctness and difference between society and state, but have infiltrated each other between state and society, interlacing and affecting this comprehensive process. The cooperation between the state and society also poses a major challenge to the constitutional doctrine, which must accept realistic development and be systematically constructed in the terms of national objectives.
【作者單位】： 德國(guó)哥廷根大學(xué);中國(guó)政法大學(xué)比較法學(xué)研究院中德法學(xué)所;
【基金】：譯者承擔(dān)的國(guó)家社科基金一般項(xiàng)目“合作行政與行政民營(yíng)化問(wèn)題研究”(項(xiàng)目號(hào)14BFX035)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D035
，

本文編號(hào)：2184740