本文選題：重大行政決策　切入點：聽證制度　出處：《蘇州大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：重大行政決策具有全局性、長期性和綜合性等特點,能夠對廣泛的、不特定的決策相對人的實質性利益產(chǎn)生重大影響。一旦決策失誤,廣大人民群眾的合法權益會受到嚴重侵害,社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展也會遭到不可挽回的損失。重大行政決策聽證程序為公民、社團、企業(yè)、政府等多方主體表達意見、交換信息提供了一個平臺,對提升決策的民主性、合法性和科學性,避免決策失誤有著重要的作用。但行政決策聽證制度畢竟屬于舶來品,在我國還處于發(fā)展的初始階段,立法上聽證規(guī)則不夠完善,實踐中聽證程序的功能也沒有得到充分發(fā)揮,聽證制度需要逐漸發(fā)展和完善。本文中,筆者對我國行政決策聽證規(guī)范和實踐進行了較為深入的分析和探討,在此基礎上對決策聽證程序的完善進行了一些思考并提出建議。本文共分為引言、正文及結語三大部分。其中,引言部分主要論述的是選題的意義、我國重大行政決策聽證存在的問題和本文所使用的研究方法。結語部分對全文進行了總結。正文部分共分為四章:第一章,重大行政決策聽證程序概述。先通過闡述行政決策的概念和特征、界定重大行政決策的范圍來明確重大行政決策的內(nèi)涵;繼而介紹了聽證制度的發(fā)展與概念,再結合前文重大行政決策的內(nèi)涵對重大行政決策聽證進行了定義和特征描述。第二章,重大行政決策聽證的法理分析。首先闡述重大行政決策聽證制度的理論基礎,包括人民主權理論和公共治理理論;其次,闡述重大行政決策聽證制度的現(xiàn)實意義,包括:提高決策的合法性、合理性和科學性;提升行政決策透明度,遏制腐敗;有利于社會和諧、穩(wěn)定。第三章,我國重大行政決策聽證程序現(xiàn)狀評析。本章分為兩部分,第一部分對我國重大行政決策聽證程序立法概況進行綜述,第二部分對我國重大行政決策聽證程序規(guī)范與實踐進行評析。通過以上分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國重大行政決策聽證程序在規(guī)范和實踐中存在的不足。第四章,完善我國重大行政決策聽證制度的思考。這一章是全文的重點,分為六個部分,分別對建立統(tǒng)一的決策聽證程序規(guī)范、擴大決策聽證程序的適用范圍、完善決策聽證主持人制度、優(yōu)化決策聽證代表的選擇機制、提高決策聽證的透明度、確定聽證筆錄的效力和構建意見反饋機制提出思考建議。
[Abstract]:Major administrative decisions have the characteristics of overall, long-term and comprehensive, which can have a significant impact on the substantive interests of relative parties in a wide and non-specific decision. The legitimate rights and interests of the broad masses of the people will be seriously infringed upon, and the social and economic development will also suffer irreparable losses. The major administrative decision hearing procedure is for citizens, associations, enterprises, governments and other parties to express their opinions. The exchange of information provides a platform for enhancing the democracy, legitimacy and scientificalness of decision making and avoiding decision-making mistakes. However, the hearing system of administrative decision making is foreign after all, and it is still in the initial stage of development in our country. The hearing rules in legislation are not perfect, the function of hearing procedure is not fully developed in practice, and the hearing system needs to be developed and perfected gradually. The author makes a deep analysis and discussion on the standard and practice of administrative decision hearing in our country, on the basis of which some thoughts and suggestions are made on the perfection of the hearing procedure of decision making. The main body and conclusion of the three parts. Among them, the introduction mainly discusses the significance of the topic, The problems existing in the hearing of major administrative decisions in China and the research methods used in this paper. The conclusion part summarizes the full text. The text is divided into four chapters: chapter one, Brief introduction of hearing procedure of Major Administrative decision. First, define the scope of major administrative decision by expounding the concept and characteristics of administrative decision, then introduce the development and concept of hearing system. Combining the connotation of the previous major administrative decision making, the paper defines and describes the characteristics of the major administrative decision hearing. Chapter two, the legal theory analysis of the major administrative decision hearing. First, the theoretical basis of the major administrative decision hearing system is expounded. It includes the theory of people's sovereignty and the theory of public governance. Secondly, it expounds the practical significance of the hearing system of major administrative decision, including: improving the legitimacy, rationality and science of the decision, enhancing the transparency of the administrative decision, curbing corruption; This chapter is divided into two parts. The first part summarizes the legislative overview of the major administrative decision hearing procedure in China. The second part analyzes the procedure and practice of the major administrative decision hearing in China. Through the above analysis, we find out the deficiency of the hearing procedure of the major administrative decision in our country. Chapter 4th, This chapter is the focus of the full text, which is divided into six parts, respectively, to establish a unified decision-making hearing procedure norms, expand the scope of application of decision-making hearing procedures, Improve the system of decision hearing moderator, optimize the selection mechanism of decision hearing representatives, improve the transparency of the decision-making hearing, determine the effectiveness of the hearing record and construct the feedback mechanism.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 梁藝;;解讀信息公開對現(xiàn)代行政權正當性的證成——以杭州市政府開放式?jīng)Q策為例[J];福建行政學院學報;2014年05期

2 丁煌;聽證制度:決策科學化和民主化的重要保證[J];政治學研究;1999年01期

3 夏金萊;;論行政決策公開——從公眾參與行政決策的視角[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2014年04期

4 宋爐安,張越;試論行政處罰的聽證程序[J];中國法學;1996年05期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 羅豪才 第九、十屆全國政協(xié)副主席、中國人權研究會會長、北京大學教授;[N];中國社會科學報;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 江博;論聽證制度及其完善路徑[D];華中師范大學;2005年

2 楊靜;論我國政策聽證的現(xiàn)狀及聽證制度的完善[D];中國海洋大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1606954