促進制造業(yè)技術研發(fā)的科技財稅政策研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-27 12:59
【摘要】：制造業(yè)是一個國家國民經(jīng)濟的重要組成部分,更是一個國家綜合國力、國際競爭力乃至國防安全的基礎行業(yè)�？萍紕�(chuàng)新對一國經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展的重要性同樣毋庸置疑。早在1995年我國便已提出“科教興國戰(zhàn)略”,將發(fā)展科技放在了國家戰(zhàn)略的高度。在2014年9月的夏季達沃斯論壇上,李克強總理提出了“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)、萬眾創(chuàng)新”的號召,此后更是將這一號召提升到國家戰(zhàn)略的高度,這些都充分體現(xiàn)了我國對科技創(chuàng)新的重視。進入到21世紀第二個十年,以美國、德國為代表的發(fā)達國家在經(jīng)歷了2008年金融危機的重創(chuàng)后,認識到制造業(yè)空心化問題的嚴重性,故而相繼提出了“再工業(yè)化”、“工業(yè)4.0”等振興本國制造業(yè)的發(fā)展計劃。與此同時,我國也進入到經(jīng)濟“新常態(tài)”,內(nèi)部改革壓力和外部競爭壓力同時增加,制造業(yè)如何發(fā)展成為擺在國家經(jīng)濟發(fā)展面前的重要課題。為此,2015年我國提出了《中國制造2025》發(fā)展規(guī)劃,這是我國在邁向制造業(yè)強國之路上的第一個十年行動綱領。這一規(guī)劃明確提出“堅持把創(chuàng)新擺在制造業(yè)發(fā)展全局的核心位置”。因此,從財政學研究的角度來看,如何運用財政政策和稅收政策來支持制造業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型升級就有了新的現(xiàn)實意義。本文的創(chuàng)新點就在于立足制造業(yè)面臨的新挑戰(zhàn),針對制造業(yè)的特點,來研究財政和稅收政策促進科技創(chuàng)新的效果并提出政策建議。本文的主線是:通過實施科技財稅政策促進制造業(yè)的科技創(chuàng)新活動,從而推動制造業(yè)的發(fā)展。文中第二章先是通過理論分析驗證科技創(chuàng)新是促進制造業(yè)發(fā)展的關鍵,然后利用比較靜態(tài)分析、資本的邊際產(chǎn)量等理論推導出財政和稅收政策是促進制造業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新的重要手段。從而將本文的主線串聯(lián)起來。第四章,通過實證分析測算出財政和稅收政策的實施效果以及我國不同主體科研投入的最優(yōu)分配比例,以及財政投入在不同主體之間的最優(yōu)分配比例,為最后的政策建議的提出打好基礎。第三章和第五章分別梳理了自改革開放以來我國科技財稅政策的歷史沿革和歐美發(fā)達國家的相關政策�？偨Y(jié)我國科技財稅政策中的不足以及歐美發(fā)達國家的成功之處,為完善我國的科技財稅政策提供重要的借鑒。第六章依據(jù)上述分析,從宏觀和微觀兩個角度提出政策建議。在宏觀層面,應積極運用財政手段,健全科技研發(fā)基礎設施,提供科研相關的公共物品并降低外部效應,并積極引導社會資源向研發(fā)領域集中,為科技創(chuàng)新提供資金支持。在微觀層面,立足制造業(yè)新產(chǎn)品從早期研發(fā)、中期成果轉(zhuǎn)化、后期產(chǎn)業(yè)化生產(chǎn)的階段特點,有針對性的靈活運用財政和稅收政策組合,特別是注重對前中期階段的優(yōu)惠,切實有效的減輕制造業(yè)企業(yè)研發(fā)風險。
[Abstract]:Manufacturing industry is an important part of a country's national economy, and is also the basic industry of a country's comprehensive national strength, international competitiveness and even national defense security. The importance of scientific and technological innovation to a country's economic and social development is also beyond doubt. As early as 1995, China put forward the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education, and put the development of science and technology at the height of the national strategy. At the Summer Davos Forum in September 2014, Premier Li Keqiang put forward the call of "Mass Entrepreneurship, all kinds of Innovation", and since then he has raised this call to the height of national strategy, which fully reflects the importance our country attaches to scientific and technological innovation. Entering the second decade of the 21st century, the developed countries, represented by the United States and Germany, after experiencing the heavy impact of the financial crisis in 2008, realized the seriousness of the problem of manufacturing hollowing, and put forward "re-industrialization" one after another. "Industry 4.0" and other development plans to revitalize the domestic manufacturing industry. At the same time, our country also enters the new normal of economy, the pressure of internal reform and external competition increases simultaneously. How to develop manufacturing industry becomes an important subject in front of national economic development. Therefore, China put forward the "made in China 2025" development plan in 2015, which is the first 10-year action plan of our country on the road to a strong manufacturing country. This plan clearly puts forward "insist on putting innovation at the core of the overall development of manufacturing industry." Therefore, from the perspective of fiscal research, how to use fiscal policy and tax policy to support the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industry has new practical significance. The innovation of this paper is based on the new challenges faced by the manufacturing industry, according to the characteristics of the manufacturing industry, to study the effects of fiscal and tax policies to promote scientific and technological innovation and put forward policy recommendations. The main line of this paper is to promote the scientific and technological innovation of manufacturing industry by implementing the policy of science and technology finance and taxation, thus promoting the development of manufacturing industry. In the second chapter, we first verify that scientific and technological innovation is the key to promote the development of manufacturing industry through theoretical analysis, and then use comparative static analysis. The theory of marginal output of capital deduces that fiscal and tax policies are important means to promote scientific and technological innovation in manufacturing industry. Thus the main line of this paper is connected together. Chapter four, through empirical analysis, estimates the effect of fiscal and tax policy, the optimal allocation ratio of scientific research input of different subjects in China, and the optimal allocation ratio of financial investment among different subjects. For the final policy recommendations to lay a good foundation. The third and fifth chapters respectively comb the history of China's science and technology finance and taxation policy since the reform and opening up and the relevant policies of the developed countries in Europe and the United States. This paper summarizes the shortcomings of our country's science and technology finance and taxation policy and the success of the developed countries in Europe and America, and provides important reference for perfecting our country's science and technology finance and taxation policy. According to the above analysis, the sixth chapter puts forward policy recommendations from macro-and micro-perspectives. At the macro level, we should actively use financial means to improve the infrastructure of scientific research and development, provide scientific research related public goods and reduce external effects, and actively guide social resources to concentrate in the field of research and development, and provide financial support for scientific and technological innovation. At the micro level, based on the characteristics of the stage of early research and development, the transformation of intermediate results, and the later stage of industrial production, the new products in the manufacturing industry should be targeted and flexibly used in the combination of fiscal and tax policies, with particular emphasis on preferential treatment in the previous and medium-term phases. Effectively reduce R & D risk of manufacturing enterprises.
【學位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F812.0
本文編號：2207365
[Abstract]:Manufacturing industry is an important part of a country's national economy, and is also the basic industry of a country's comprehensive national strength, international competitiveness and even national defense security. The importance of scientific and technological innovation to a country's economic and social development is also beyond doubt. As early as 1995, China put forward the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education, and put the development of science and technology at the height of the national strategy. At the Summer Davos Forum in September 2014, Premier Li Keqiang put forward the call of "Mass Entrepreneurship, all kinds of Innovation", and since then he has raised this call to the height of national strategy, which fully reflects the importance our country attaches to scientific and technological innovation. Entering the second decade of the 21st century, the developed countries, represented by the United States and Germany, after experiencing the heavy impact of the financial crisis in 2008, realized the seriousness of the problem of manufacturing hollowing, and put forward "re-industrialization" one after another. "Industry 4.0" and other development plans to revitalize the domestic manufacturing industry. At the same time, our country also enters the new normal of economy, the pressure of internal reform and external competition increases simultaneously. How to develop manufacturing industry becomes an important subject in front of national economic development. Therefore, China put forward the "made in China 2025" development plan in 2015, which is the first 10-year action plan of our country on the road to a strong manufacturing country. This plan clearly puts forward "insist on putting innovation at the core of the overall development of manufacturing industry." Therefore, from the perspective of fiscal research, how to use fiscal policy and tax policy to support the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industry has new practical significance. The innovation of this paper is based on the new challenges faced by the manufacturing industry, according to the characteristics of the manufacturing industry, to study the effects of fiscal and tax policies to promote scientific and technological innovation and put forward policy recommendations. The main line of this paper is to promote the scientific and technological innovation of manufacturing industry by implementing the policy of science and technology finance and taxation, thus promoting the development of manufacturing industry. In the second chapter, we first verify that scientific and technological innovation is the key to promote the development of manufacturing industry through theoretical analysis, and then use comparative static analysis. The theory of marginal output of capital deduces that fiscal and tax policies are important means to promote scientific and technological innovation in manufacturing industry. Thus the main line of this paper is connected together. Chapter four, through empirical analysis, estimates the effect of fiscal and tax policy, the optimal allocation ratio of scientific research input of different subjects in China, and the optimal allocation ratio of financial investment among different subjects. For the final policy recommendations to lay a good foundation. The third and fifth chapters respectively comb the history of China's science and technology finance and taxation policy since the reform and opening up and the relevant policies of the developed countries in Europe and the United States. This paper summarizes the shortcomings of our country's science and technology finance and taxation policy and the success of the developed countries in Europe and America, and provides important reference for perfecting our country's science and technology finance and taxation policy. According to the above analysis, the sixth chapter puts forward policy recommendations from macro-and micro-perspectives. At the macro level, we should actively use financial means to improve the infrastructure of scientific research and development, provide scientific research related public goods and reduce external effects, and actively guide social resources to concentrate in the field of research and development, and provide financial support for scientific and technological innovation. At the micro level, based on the characteristics of the stage of early research and development, the transformation of intermediate results, and the later stage of industrial production, the new products in the manufacturing industry should be targeted and flexibly used in the combination of fiscal and tax policies, with particular emphasis on preferential treatment in the previous and medium-term phases. Effectively reduce R & D risk of manufacturing enterprises.
【學位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F812.0
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 劉閑月;孫銳;趙大麗;;激勵集群企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的財稅政策研究[J];財政研究;2014年04期
2 李丹;;美國再工業(yè)化戰(zhàn)略對我國制造業(yè)的多層級影響與對策[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2013年06期
3 戴金平;譚書詩;;美國經(jīng)濟再平衡中的制造業(yè)復興戰(zhàn)略[J];南開學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年01期
4 楊東德;滕興華;;美國國家創(chuàng)新體系及創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略研究[J];北京行政學院學報;2012年06期
5 牛澤東;張倩肖;;中國裝備制造業(yè)的技術創(chuàng)新效率[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟技術經(jīng)濟研究;2012年11期
6 黃萃;蘇竣;施麗萍;程嘯天;;中國高新技術產(chǎn)業(yè)稅收優(yōu)惠政策文本量化研究[J];科研管理;2011年10期
7 李炳安;;美國支持科技創(chuàng)新的財稅金融政策研究[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2011年07期
8 張金勝;尚海濤;師萍;;我國政府R&D投入及優(yōu)化研究[J];科學學與科學技術管理;2011年04期
9 王蒼峰;;稅收減免與研發(fā)投資:基于我國制造業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];稅務研究;2009年11期
10 張華勝;彭春燕;成微;;美國政府科技政策及其對經(jīng)濟影響[J];中國科技論壇;2009年03期
，本文編號：2207365
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2207365.html
教材專著
