【摘要】：產業(yè)結構是指在其經濟活動中,某一區(qū)域內各產業(yè)所表現出來的產業(yè)間以及產業(yè)內部要素間的一些數量關系或經濟聯系,它是經濟結構的重要組成部分,與經濟增長有著非常密切的關系。一方面,區(qū)域產業(yè)結構重組已經成為培育新的經濟增長點的重要戰(zhàn)略措施；另一方面,區(qū)域產業(yè)結構的一些不良發(fā)展趨勢也已成為實現資源優(yōu)化配置與再配置、推動產業(yè)結構高度化和合理化發(fā)展過程的絆腳石。 浙江省、福建省、廣東省作為海峽西岸戰(zhàn)略等區(qū)域戰(zhàn)略的主要實施載體,若能進行合理的區(qū)域分工,區(qū)域產業(yè)間能協(xié)調發(fā)展,將拓展區(qū)域合作的功能,積極促進海峽西岸的發(fā)展,也能使東南沿海三省成為擴大對外開放、加快經濟發(fā)展的平臺。由此可見,研究東南沿海三省的制造業(yè)產業(yè)結構趨同問題是十分必要的,不僅有助于完善產業(yè)結構的理論體系,而且能為為各級政府部門制定產業(yè)政策提供一些事實和理論依據,從而促進產業(yè)結構優(yōu)化。 本文通過比較分析目前國內外學者較為常用的產業(yè)結構趨同測量方法后,選擇了CMS模型作為分析工具,對東南沿海三省制造業(yè)結構趨同現象進行了實證分析。根據模型測算結果將浙江省、福建省和廣東省的制造業(yè)分為優(yōu)勢產業(yè)、潛力產業(yè)、弱勢產業(yè)、成熟產業(yè)四類后,得到了以下四個結論：第一,東南沿海三省之間確實存在著比較明顯的產業(yè)結構趨同現象；第二,福建、廣東兩省在2004年至2011年間一直保持著制造業(yè)快速發(fā)展態(tài)勢,并且產業(yè)結構在不斷地完善；第三,浙江省的制造業(yè)大省優(yōu)勢正在逐漸減弱；第四,浙江省制造業(yè)中的大多數成熟產業(yè)正在逐漸成為廣東省和福建省制造業(yè)的優(yōu)勢產業(yè)和潛力產業(yè)。這種現象的發(fā)生主要有四方面原因,包括歷史遺留影響、企業(yè)規(guī)模結構不合理、市場價格誤導、協(xié)調機制不完善。為此,本文提出了以下四條發(fā)展建議：第一,改造提升傳統(tǒng)優(yōu)勢產業(yè),發(fā)揮區(qū)域優(yōu)勢；第二,培育龍頭企業(yè),發(fā)展產業(yè)集群；第三,提高產業(yè)技術水平,增強自主創(chuàng)新能力；第四,培育發(fā)展各自的戰(zhàn)略性新興產業(yè)。
[Abstract]:Industrial structure refers to some quantitative relations or economic relations between industries in a certain region and among the elements of industry, which is an important part of economic structure. And economic growth has a very close relationship. On the one hand, the restructuring of regional industrial structure has become an important strategic measure to cultivate new economic growth points; on the other hand, some unhealthy development trends of regional industrial structure have become the realization of optimal allocation and re-allocation of resources. The stumbling block in the process of promoting the development of higher industrial structure and rationalization. Zhejiang Province, Fujian Province and Guangdong Province are the main carriers of regional strategies such as the strategy of the West Bank of the Straits. If a reasonable regional division of labor can be carried out and regional industries can develop in a coordinated manner, it will expand the function of regional cooperation. Actively promoting the development of the West Bank of the Straits can also make the three provinces along the southeast coast a platform for opening wider to the outside world and speeding up economic development. From this we can see that it is very necessary to study the convergence of manufacturing industry structure in the three southeast coastal provinces, which is not only helpful to improve the theoretical system of industrial structure, Moreover, it can provide some facts and theoretical basis for government departments at all levels to formulate industrial policies, thus promoting the optimization of industrial structure. After comparing and analyzing the common measurement methods of industrial structure convergence at home and abroad, this paper chooses CMS model as the analysis tool, and makes an empirical analysis on the phenomenon of structural convergence of manufacturing industry in three provinces along the southeast coast. According to the results of the model, the manufacturing industry of Zhejiang Province, Fujian Province and Guangdong Province is divided into four categories: advantage industry, potential industry, weak industry and mature industry. The conclusions are as follows: first, There is indeed a relatively obvious phenomenon of industrial structure convergence among the three provinces along the southeast coast. Second, Fujian and Guangdong provinces have maintained a rapid development trend of manufacturing industry between 2004 and 2011, and the industrial structure has been continuously improved. Third, The advantage of manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province is gradually weakening. Fourth, most of the mature manufacturing industries in Zhejiang Province are becoming the dominant industries and potential industries of manufacturing industry in Guangdong Province and Fujian Province. There are four main reasons for this phenomenon, including historical influence, unreasonable scale structure, misleading market price and imperfect coordination mechanism. Therefore, this paper puts forward the following four development suggestions: first, to improve the traditional superior industries and give full play to regional advantages; second, to cultivate leading enterprises and develop industrial clusters; third, to improve the level of industrial technology and enhance the ability of independent innovation; Fourth, cultivate and develop their respective strategic emerging industries.
【學位授予單位】：長春工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F427

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 譚福河,孔令秋,楊立斌;長江三角洲地區(qū)產業(yè)結構趨同化分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年17期

2 李榮國,陳君;區(qū)域產業(yè)結構趨同及發(fā)展對策[J];財經問題研究;2000年08期

3 陳耀;產業(yè)結構趨同的度量及合意與非合意性[J];中國工業(yè)經濟;1998年04期

4 陳建軍;長江三角洲地區(qū)的產業(yè)同構及產業(yè)定位[J];中國工業(yè)經濟;2004年02期

5 韋智蘭;陳君;封永梅;;我國產業(yè)結構趨同成因分析綜述[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2006年03期

6 孫玲;試論產業(yè)結構的高度化[J];經營管理者;1998年06期

7 王子龍;譚清美;許簫迪;;高技術產業(yè)集聚水平測度方法及實證研究[J];科學學研究;2006年05期

8 梁曉艷;李志剛;湯書昆;趙林捷;;我國高技術產業(yè)的空間聚集現象研究——基于省際高技術產業(yè)產值的空間計量分析[J];科學學研究;2007年03期

9 許簫迪;王子龍;譚清美;;高技術產業(yè)演化的時空分異測度研究[J];科學學研究;2007年06期

10 楊林,白奉源;區(qū)域產業(yè)結構趨同——個人理性與集體理性的沖突[J];蘭州大學學報;2002年03期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 王志華;長江三角洲地區(qū)制造業(yè)同構若干問題研究[D];南京航空航天大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王磊;長三角地區(qū)產業(yè)同構問題研究[D];華東師范大學;2007年

，

本文編號：2168590