博弈與互惠—利川旅游社區(qū)參與理論的實證研究
[Abstract]:The rapid development of tourism has brought great economic benefits and broad development prospects, which has been widely concerned by the government, enterprises, communities, scholars and so on. This study intends to use community theory to analyze the participation relationship and characteristics of tourism stakeholders in Lichuan. This research is divided into four parts. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and significance of the research, puts forward the content of this study, summarizes the research methods, and reviews the relevant studies at home and abroad, which is the theoretical basis of this study. The second part introduces the basic situation of tourism in Lichuan. The author selects four representative scenic spots in Lichuan, such as Tenglong Cave, Big well, Dragon Boat Water Township, Fobao Mountain, to conduct field investigation, and analyze the first-hand data comprehensively. Describing the community participation of each scenic spot is the case support of this study. Tenglong Cave scenic area income is better. The reciprocity is: with the deep development of Tenglong Cave, the scenic spot has built the highway for the local residents, which is convenient for the residents of the community to travel; The government provides the service to the enterprise, guarantees the scenic spot normal operation, the corresponding scenic spot successfully manages, enhances the Lichuan popularity. The game shows that local community residents are willing to participate in tourism sharing results, but due to various factors, they are not enough to participate, and scenic spots are unwilling to carry out the government's decision to create A due to cost factors. The community participation in Daxi Scenic spot is not very hot. Residents around the high participation enthusiasm, but the scenic area enterprise initiative is not enough, the effect of participation is not good, share the dividend less, the performance of reciprocity is not outstanding. The benefit game is shown as: the profit of the scenic spots allocated to the related tourism enterprises is not high, which leads to the travel agencies and other related enterprises consider less scenic spots in the arrangement of tourism products, and the tourist market has been depressed; The development of scenic spot has not reached the expected goal of the government, and it is in a dilemma; there are land disputes between the scenic spot and the surrounding residents. These games hinder the development of Daxi scenic spot. Dragon boat water scenic areas of the contradictions are relatively concentrated. The game features are obvious: the contradiction between scenic spots and surrounding residents is prominent; the relationship with the government is not harmonious; travel agencies and other related enterprises to the scenic spot evaluation is not high. The development of scenic spot brings direct economic income to boatmen, tour guides and other community residents. During the normal operating period of the floating scenic spot in Fobao Mountain, the level of community participation is high. The government, enterprises, and community residents are all able to participate in the development of tourism, and their respective interests are better safeguarded. However, the scenic spots are closed down because of safety accidents. The original situation of community participation no longer, and then evolved to hope that the government to help enterprises out of difficulties. The third part uses the theory of community participation to analyze the four selected cases, found that there are four cases of scenic spots between the government, enterprises, community residents of the interests of the sharing and game, and then summed up the characteristics of tourism community participation in two types of Lichuan. One is the game type community participation, the other is the reciprocal community participation. The fourth part is the conclusion, according to the current situation of community participation in tourism, from the community capacity building, limited government participation and enterprise initiative as three aspects to improve the efficiency of community participation, put forward an effective participation model. We hope to realize the mutual benefit between tourism participants and extend to other scenic spots in Lichuan.
【學位授予單位】:湖北民族學院
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F592.7
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 丁敏;李宏;;旅游社區(qū)增權理論研究綜述[J];首都師范大學學報(自然科學版);2016年03期
2 孫鳳芝;許峰;;社區(qū)參與旅游發(fā)展研究評述與展望[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2013年07期
3 楊霞;;旅游人類學發(fā)展述評[J];民族論壇;2013年06期
4 保繼剛;楊昀;;旅游商業(yè)化背景下本地居民地方依戀的變遷研究——基于陽朔西街的案例分析[J];廣西民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年04期
5 惠紅;唐兵;敬陽;;旅游發(fā)展中社區(qū)參與差異的文化原因分析[J];旅游論壇;2010年05期
6 劉麗梅;呂君;;中國社區(qū)參與旅游發(fā)展研究述評[J];地理科學進展;2010年08期
7 李航;李偉;;民族社區(qū)參與旅游發(fā)展問題的研究——以西雙版納民族社區(qū)為例[J];旅游研究;2010年02期
8 張曉萍;劉德鵬;;人類學視野中的旅游對目的地負面影響研究述評[J];青海民族研究;2010年01期
9 孫九霞;;旅游對目的地社區(qū)族群認同的影響——基于不同旅游作用的案例分析[J];中山大學學報(社會科學版);2010年01期
10 保繼剛;孫九霞;;雨崩村社區(qū)旅游:社區(qū)參與方式及其增權意義[J];旅游論壇;2008年04期
相關博士學位論文 前3條
1 王會戰(zhàn);文化遺產(chǎn)地社區(qū)旅游增權研究[D];西北大學;2015年
2 王詠;社區(qū)居民感知視角下黃山風景區(qū)門戶城鎮(zhèn)旅游發(fā)展特征與機理研究[D];安徽師范大學;2014年
3 操建華;旅游業(yè)對中國農(nóng)村和農(nóng)民的影響的研究[D];中國社會科學院研究生院;2002年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 曾艷;國內外社區(qū)參與旅游發(fā)展模式比較研究[D];廈門大學;2007年
2 王敏嫻;鄉(xiāng)村旅游社區(qū)參與機制研究[D];浙江大學;2004年
,本文編號:2394991
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/lvyoujiudianguanlilunwen/2394991.html