海島型旅游目的地生態(tài)補償標準及其差異研究——以普陀山、朱家尖、桃花島和南北長山島為例
[Abstract]:Internationally, tourism tax (polluter pays principle) and tourism fee (user pay principle) are widely used solutions to environmental externalities caused by tourism, among them, accommodation tax, Fuel taxes and (extra) admission fees are some of the most common examples; as the Coase market's solution to environmental externalities, the principle of payment for ecosystem (environmental) services (pay-for-beneficiaries) has gained increasing attention in tourism. Island ecosystem is fragile, island tourism destination environment sustainability is a necessary condition for island tourism sustainable development, island tourism development threatens island tourism destination environment sustainability. In this paper, (PES) for ecosystem (environment) services and conditional value assessment (CVM),) are used to evaluate Putuo Mountain, Zhujiajian Island, Taohua Island and North and South Changshan Island as examples, and 2013 as the evaluation base year. By investigating the willingness of tourists to provide landscape, swim, adjust temperature, absorb CO_2 and forest ecosystem to provide landscape, cool, store fresh water and absorb CO_2, etc. The ecological compensation criteria of the four island tourism destinations were evaluated, and the differences of individual income and ecosystem services were analyzed. This paper analyzes the reasons for the difference of ecological compensation standard per capita in four island tourism destinations from three aspects, such as the difference of tourist travel cost. The results are as follows: (1) in 2013, the ecological compensation standards of the four island tourism destinations were 44464.22 脳 10 ~ 4 yuan in Putuo Mountain, 7736.76 脳 10 ~ 4 yuan in Zhujiajian and 4324.54 脳 10 ~ 4 yuan in Taohua Island, respectively. (2) the per capita ecological compensation standard (per capita WTP value or per capita PES value) for the four island tourism destinations was 74.77 yuan per person in Putuo Mountain, 72.34 yuan per person in Zhujiajian and 68.95 yuan per person in Taohua Island. (3) the difference of tourists' personal income is the main influencing factor of the difference of ecological compensation standard per capita in island tourism destination.
【作者單位】: 青島大學商學院;
【基金】:國家自然科學基金項目“海島型旅游目的地生態(tài)補償標準研究”(41301622) 山東省自然科學基金項目“基于空間尺度的海島型旅游目的地生態(tài)補償標準研究”(ZR2013GQ005) 山東省軟科學項目“山東濱海濕地游憩價值評估”(2014RKB01415) 山東省高等學校人文社科研究項目“海島資源環(huán)境承載力與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展程度協(xié)調度研究”(J14WE24)
【分類號】:F592.7
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前4條
1 陳鋼華;;海島型目的地的旅游滲透度——海南案例及其國際比較[J];旅游學刊;2012年11期
2 鄭耀星;林文鵬;儲德平;;海島型旅游地空間競爭與區(qū)域合作研究[J];旅游學刊;2008年12期
3 張志宏;李悅錚;;海島型旅游非優(yōu)區(qū)的開發(fā)研究——以西沙群島為例[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2010年03期
4 ;[J];;年期
相關會議論文 前5條
1 魏成元;;海島型旅游目的地營銷模式探討[A];區(qū)域旅游:創(chuàng)新與轉型——第十四屆全國區(qū)域旅游開發(fā)學術研討會暨第二屆海南國際旅游島大論壇論文集[C];2009年
2 顧彬;;淺議海島型景區(qū)旅游垃圾問題——以浙江省舟山市朱家尖島為例[A];2012中國旅游科學年會論文集[C];2012年
3 張志宏;李悅錚;;海島型旅游非優(yōu)區(qū)的開發(fā)研究——以西沙群島為例[A];區(qū)域旅游:創(chuàng)新與轉型——第十四屆全國區(qū)域旅游開發(fā)學術研討會暨第二屆海南國際旅游島大論壇論文集[C];2009年
4 許世蕓;;美國夏威夷觀光政策[A];休閑農(nóng)業(yè)與鄉(xiāng)村旅游發(fā)展——第二屆“海峽兩岸休閑農(nóng)業(yè)與觀光旅游學術研討會”論文集[C];2004年
5 李悅錚;楊新宇;黃丹;;群島旅游開發(fā)的吉美模式研究[A];區(qū)域旅游:創(chuàng)新與轉型——第十四屆全國區(qū)域旅游開發(fā)學術研討會暨第二屆海南國際旅游島大論壇論文集[C];2009年
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 記者 龔立仁;城市型海島型目的地最受青睞[N];中國旅游報;2010年
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 朱晶晶;基于GMS的海島型旅游地管理模式研究[D];安徽師范大學;2006年
,本文編號:2264288
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/lvyoujiudianguanlilunwen/2264288.html