本文選題：綜合評價 + 群體評價　； 參考：《運籌與管理》2017年05期

【摘要】：針對線性無量綱化方法對群體評價中信息集結(jié)結(jié)果的影響問題,本文以線性加權(quán)的群體信息集結(jié)方法為背景,以集結(jié)成的群體信息最大程度地擴大被評價對象間的差異為導(dǎo)向,給出了群體信息集結(jié)過程中無量綱化方法選擇的若干結(jié)論和建議。首先設(shè)定評價情景并提出研究假設(shè),分析不同無量綱化方法集結(jié)成的群體信息對各被評價對象間的差異影響;然后對造成被評價對象之間差異的主要因素進行了討論;通過對不同因素的分析以及與未經(jīng)過無量綱化處理集結(jié)成的群體信息中各被評價對象間差異的比較,得出一些重要的結(jié)論,并給出一些針對群體信息結(jié)集過程中選擇無量綱化方法的建議;最后,用一個算例檢驗了結(jié)論的有效性。
[Abstract]:Aiming at the influence of linear dimensionless method on the result of information aggregation in group evaluation, this paper takes the linear weighted group information assembly method as the background, and takes the assembled group information as the direction to maximize the difference between the evaluated objects. Some conclusions and suggestions on the selection of dimensionless methods in the process of mass information gathering are given. Firstly, the evaluation scenarios are set up and the research hypotheses are put forward to analyze the influence of the group information gathered by different dimensionless methods on the differences among the evaluated objects, and then the main factors that cause the differences among the evaluated objects are discussed. Based on the analysis of different factors and the comparison of the differences between the groups of information collected without dimensionalization, some important conclusions are drawn. Some suggestions for selecting dimensionless method in the process of group information gathering are given. Finally, an example is given to verify the validity of the conclusion.
【作者單位】： 東北大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院;東北評價中心;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金資助項目(71671031)
【分類號】：C934

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張笑;馮廷勇;;決策信心在信息化從眾中的作用[J];心理科學(xué);2014年03期

，

本文編號：1829905