本文選題：重大突發(fā)公共事件 + 政府��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國已進(jìn)入社會轉(zhuǎn)型的特殊時期,重大突發(fā)公共事件頻發(fā),并呈現(xiàn)常態(tài)化和多元化的特點(diǎn)。突發(fā)公共事件既包括傳統(tǒng)的自然災(zāi)害和生產(chǎn)性事故,又包括公共衛(wèi)生事件、環(huán)境污染事件、食品安全事故、還包括涉及信仰危機(jī)、合法性危機(jī)的社會群體性事件,重大突發(fā)公共事件得不到有效應(yīng)對將急劇改變公共管理和公共資源配置秩序,導(dǎo)致社會運(yùn)作機(jī)制中斷和癱瘓,因此如何有效應(yīng)對非常關(guān)鍵。面對如此復(fù)雜的公共事件類型和千差萬別的成因,完全靠政府一方的力量往往已不現(xiàn)實,它涉及政府、企業(yè)、第三部門等多個主體協(xié)調(diào)治理的領(lǐng)域。本文選取了其中的政府與第三部門的協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對作為研究的主題。政府失靈與市場失靈的交互存在賦予了第三部門存在和發(fā)展的重要意義,隨著“全球社團(tuán)革命”的到來,我國第三部門的力量也迅速壯大,第三部門以其區(qū)別市場與政府的運(yùn)作機(jī)理成為應(yīng)對重大突發(fā)公共事件的重要組織力量。第三部門在社會治理、社會管理中的特殊作用,以及日益顯現(xiàn)的與政府的合作互補(bǔ)功能,都告訴人們一個不爭的事實,政府要有效應(yīng)對重大突發(fā)公共事件,必須與第三部門展開合作,協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對。但政府與第三部門的協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對還存在諸多困境,有來自政府的思維慣性困境,有來自第三部門自身的內(nèi)生性困境,還有來自政府與第三部門協(xié)作應(yīng)對無序的困境。其中既有我國原有計劃經(jīng)濟(jì)體制和現(xiàn)有“雙重管理體制”的體制性弊端,也有第三部門自律不足、相關(guān)法律法規(guī)缺失與滯后,以及我國公民社會基礎(chǔ)薄弱,志愿文化欠缺,民眾的危機(jī)應(yīng)對素質(zhì)不高等多種原因所致。通過對美國、日本在政府與第三部門協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對方面的經(jīng)驗考察與借鑒,筆者認(rèn)為我國應(yīng)從政府、第三部門、社會三重維度出發(fā),構(gòu)建政府與第三部門協(xié)調(diào)應(yīng)對重大突發(fā)公共事件的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,即建立在相互信任基礎(chǔ)上的第三部門參與激勵機(jī)制,政府與第三部門的信息互通機(jī)制、利益表達(dá)溝通機(jī)制、決策協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制和互為監(jiān)督機(jī)制,真正實現(xiàn)社會有序、穩(wěn)定、協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:At present, China has entered a special period of social transformation, with frequent occurrence of public incidents and characteristics of normalization and pluralism. Public emergencies include both traditional natural disasters and productive accidents, including public health events, environmental pollution events, food safety accidents, and the crisis of belief and legitimacy. Social group events, the lack of effective response to public emergencies, will dramatically change the public management and public resource allocation order, cause social operation mechanism to break and paralysis, so how to effectively deal with it is very critical. Facing such complex types of public events and thousands of other causes, the power of the government is always on the power of the government. It is not realistic. It involves many subjects such as government, enterprise and third departments. This paper selects the coordinated response between the government and the third sector as the subject of the study. The interaction between the government failure and the market failure gives the importance of the existence and development of the third sectors, with the "global community revolution" to the point. The strength of the third sector of our country has also grown rapidly. The third sector has become an important organizational force to deal with major public incidents by distinguishing the market and the operation mechanism of the government. The third departments have a special role in social governance, social management, and the increasingly apparent cooperation and complementarity with the government. The government should cooperate with the third sector and coordinate the response, but there are many difficulties in coordinating the coordination of the government and the third sector, with the dilemma of thinking from the government, the endogeneity from the third sector, and the coordination of the government and the third departments to cope with the disorder. Among them, there are both the existing planned economic system and the existing "dual management system" in our country, as well as the shortcomings of the third departments, lack of self-discipline, the lack of relevant laws and regulations, and the lack of civil society in our country, the lack of voluntary culture, and the poor quality of the people's crisis. Based on the experience and reference of the government and the third sector, the author believes that China should set out from the government, the third sector and the social three dimensions, to build the coordination mechanism between the government and the third department to coordinate the major public emergencies, namely, the third sector participation incentive mechanism based on the mutual trust, the government and the third party. The three sector's information exchange mechanism, interest expression and communication mechanism, decision-making coordination mechanism and mutual supervision mechanism can truly achieve orderly, stable and coordinated development of the society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 俞可平;;改善我國公民社會制度環(huán)境的若干思考[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2006年01期

2 蘇大林;周巍;申永豐;;走向良性互動:政府與非政府組織合作關(guān)系探討[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2006年04期

3 肖鵬英;;當(dāng)代公共危機(jī)管理研究的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2006年04期

4 崔開云;;當(dāng)下西方國家政府與非政府組織關(guān)系研究述評[J];江淮論壇;2010年06期

5 韓俊魁;;艾滋病防治領(lǐng)域非政府組織參與的障礙及其解決:以云南為例[J];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

6 金太軍;沈承誠;;論災(zāi)后重建中多元治理主體間的互動協(xié)作關(guān)系[J];青海社會科學(xué);2010年03期

7 徐祖榮;;中國志愿服務(wù)的制約因素及制度改進(jìn)[J];武漢科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期

8 高丙中;社會團(tuán)體的合法性問題[J];中國社會科學(xué);2000年02期

9 汪莉;;非政府組織發(fā)展困境的制度性因素分析及制度重構(gòu)[J];中國行政管理;2009年02期

，

本文編號：2048103