發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-10 03:09

  本文選題：公示　切入點(diǎn)：公告　出處：《檔案管理》2017年03期

【摘要】：內(nèi)容的確定性不是公告的文體屬性,信息確定與否不構(gòu)成公告和公示的本質(zhì)區(qū)別,以公告發(fā)布公示信息有充足的文體理?yè)?jù),黨政機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)外正式發(fā)布重要的公示事項(xiàng)應(yīng)以公示性公告行文。公示不具備法定公文的特定效力和規(guī)范體式,不應(yīng)越位侵襲公告的文體功能和行文領(lǐng)域,公示的"法定公文化"傾向應(yīng)予以警惕。公示性公告的使用必須嚴(yán)守文體規(guī)范而不逾功能界限,黨政機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)設(shè)機(jī)構(gòu)不具備對(duì)外正式發(fā)文的權(quán)限,不應(yīng)越位制發(fā)公示性公告。公示性公告與公示性通告、公示性通知都是合理可行的公文種類,各有其特定的功能定位和明確的文體邊界,三者之間是相對(duì)獨(dú)立而又彼此互補(bǔ)的共生關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The certainty of the content is not the stylistic attribute of the public announcement, and whether the information is confirmed or not does not constitute the essential difference between the public announcement and the public announcement.Party and government organs should publish important public affairs with public announcement.Public notice does not have the specific effect and normative style of legal document, it should not offside attack the stylistic function and writing field of public notice, and the tendency of public notice "legal public culture" should be guarded.The use of publicity announcements must strictly abide by the stylistic norms and not exceed the functional limits. The internal organs of the Party and government organs do not have the authority to issue official documents to the outside world, and they should not issue public announcements offside.Public announcement, public notice and public notice are all reasonable and feasible types of official documents, each has its specific functional orientation and clear stylistic boundary, the three are relatively independent and complementary symbiotic relationship.
【作者單位】： 渤海大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：遼寧省教育廳2016年研究項(xiàng)目“促進(jìn)錦州區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)對(duì)策研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào)071603424)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：C931.46
，

本文編號(hào)：1729386