【摘要】：采用建筑物整體平移技術(shù)可以對(duì)古建筑進(jìn)行保護(hù),本文根據(jù)某古塔平移工程實(shí)例,對(duì)建筑物整體平移工程托換結(jié)構(gòu)存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析。建筑物整體平移工程中,托換結(jié)構(gòu)的強(qiáng)度和剛度關(guān)系到上部結(jié)構(gòu)的安全,本文采用ANSYS建立托換結(jié)構(gòu)的有限元模型,計(jì)算托換結(jié)構(gòu)托換梁的最大撓度和最大應(yīng)力;建筑物平移過(guò)程中可能出現(xiàn)超載,為保證托換結(jié)構(gòu)具有足夠的安全儲(chǔ)備,將托換結(jié)構(gòu)模型加載至開裂,對(duì)托換結(jié)構(gòu)的抗裂安全系數(shù)進(jìn)行分析;為對(duì)托換結(jié)構(gòu)梁高設(shè)計(jì)提供一定的參考依據(jù),計(jì)算不同預(yù)應(yīng)力托換梁梁高條件下托換結(jié)構(gòu)的開裂允許荷載,對(duì)不同荷載作用下預(yù)應(yīng)力托換梁梁高的選取提出建議;古塔在平移過(guò)程中可能出現(xiàn)失穩(wěn)破壞,對(duì)沿軌道方向和垂直于軌道方向兩種不利工況下塔體的塔底應(yīng)力狀態(tài)和塔頂位移進(jìn)行計(jì)算,根據(jù)計(jì)算結(jié)果對(duì)古塔的穩(wěn)定性進(jìn)行分析。研究結(jié)果表明:在施工工況下,托換結(jié)構(gòu)預(yù)應(yīng)力托換梁的最大撓度為0.72mm,是梁計(jì)算跨度的1/11169,滿足《混凝土結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范》對(duì)受彎構(gòu)件撓度的要求;托換結(jié)構(gòu)的預(yù)應(yīng)力托換梁混凝土最大拉應(yīng)力值為1.73MPa,小于C40混凝土抗拉強(qiáng)度標(biāo)準(zhǔn)值2.39MPa,混凝土最大壓應(yīng)力小于混凝土抗壓強(qiáng)度標(biāo)準(zhǔn)值,托換結(jié)構(gòu)混凝土不會(huì)發(fā)生開裂或壓碎。托換結(jié)構(gòu)的抗裂安全儲(chǔ)備系數(shù)為1.6,大于預(yù)應(yīng)力混凝土受彎構(gòu)件的安全系數(shù)允許值1.5。設(shè)計(jì)的托換結(jié)構(gòu)能夠滿足工程安全性要求,且具有足夠的抗裂承載能力安全儲(chǔ)備。在沿軌道方向不利工況下,古塔的底部應(yīng)力處于全截面受壓狀態(tài),塔頂?shù)淖畲笪灰戚^小,古塔在平移過(guò)程中的穩(wěn)定性滿足工程要求;在垂直軌道方向的不利工況下,古塔的穩(wěn)定性不能按照塔底的應(yīng)力狀態(tài)判定,應(yīng)通過(guò)控制塔體的傾斜角度保證古塔的穩(wěn)定性。
[Abstract]:According to the example of an ancient pagoda translation project, the problems existing in the underpinning structure of the building integral translation engineering can be analyzed in this paper. The strength and stiffness of the underpinning structure are related to the safety of the superstructure in the whole translational engineering of the building. In this paper, the finite element model of the underpinning structure is established by ANSYS, and the maximum deflection and the maximum stress of the underpinning beam of the underpinning structure are calculated. In order to ensure the sufficient safety reserve of the underpinning structure, the model of the underpinning structure is loaded into the crack, and the anti-crack safety factor of the underpinning structure is analyzed. In order to provide a certain reference for the design of the beam height of the underpinning structure and calculate the allowable cracking load of the underpinning structure under different pre-stressed beam height conditions, some suggestions are put forward for the selection of the height of the pre-stressed underpinning beam under different loads. In the process of translation, the tower may lose stability. The stress state of tower bottom and the displacement of tower top are calculated under two unfavorable working conditions along the track direction and perpendicular to the track direction, and the stability of the tower is analyzed according to the calculation results. The results show that under construction conditions, the maximum deflection of prestressed underpinning beam is 0.72 mm, which is 1 / 11169 of the calculated span of beam, which meets the requirements of deflection of flexural members in the Code for Design of concrete structures. The maximum tensile stress of prestressed underpinning beam is 1.73 MPa, and the maximum compressive stress of concrete is less than the standard value of compressive strength of concrete, which is less than the standard value of C40 concrete tensile strength 2.39 MPa, and the maximum compressive stress of concrete is less than the standard value of concrete compressive strength. The underpinning structure concrete will not crack or crush. The fracture safety reserve coefficient of underpinning structure is 1.6, which is larger than the allowable value of safety factor of prestressed concrete flexural members. The designed underpinning structure can meet the requirements of engineering safety and has sufficient safety reserve of anti-crack bearing capacity. Under the unfavorable working conditions along the track direction, the stress at the bottom of the tower is in the state of full cross-section compression, and the maximum displacement of the tower top is smaller, and the stability of the tower in the process of translation meets the engineering requirements. The stability of the ancient pagoda can not be judged according to the stress state of the bottom of the tower under the adverse working condition of the vertical track, and the stability of the ancient tower should be ensured by controlling the inclined angle of the tower body.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU311;TU746.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊勇;吳二軍;張青;倪有豪;楊洋;;大體型旋轉(zhuǎn)移位工程樁基上軌道梁有限元分析[J];工程抗震與加固改造;2013年06期

2 劉仁元;;水陽(yáng)江龍溪古塔整體保護(hù)平移施工[J];江淮水利科技;2013年05期

3 趙燦強(qiáng);邊智慧;付素娟;崔少華;;古塔整體平移技術(shù)分析[J];建筑結(jié)構(gòu);2013年S1期

4 張?chǎng)?賈留東;夏風(fēng)敏;王恒;譚天樂(lè);司道林;李玉平;;框架柱托換節(jié)點(diǎn)受力性能試驗(yàn)研究[J];建筑結(jié)構(gòu)學(xué)報(bào);2011年11期

5 譚小蓉;;某古磚塔抗震性能分析研究[J];四川建筑科學(xué)研究;2011年05期

6 張宗敏;張新中;;夾梁式墻托換結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)方法研究[J];建筑科學(xué);2011年09期

7 吳二軍;陳竹;趙瓊娟;姜偉;王建永;藍(lán)戊己;;復(fù)雜移位工程托換結(jié)構(gòu)施工不利工況內(nèi)力分析[J];施工技術(shù);2011年06期

8 吳二軍;李愛(ài)群;張興龍;;建筑物整體移位技術(shù)的發(fā)展概況與展望[J];施工技術(shù);2011年06期

9 張?chǎng)?李安起;趙考重;;建筑結(jié)構(gòu)鑒定與加固改造技術(shù)的進(jìn)展[J];工程力學(xué);2011年01期

10 陳平;王智華;沈治國(guó);;大象寺塔現(xiàn)狀安全穩(wěn)定性分析[J];水利與建筑工程學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊勇;天津西站主站樓整體遷移關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究與應(yīng)用[D];天津大學(xué);2011年

2 齊金永;建筑物遷移虛擬仿真技術(shù)研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

3 譚堅(jiān)貞;建筑物移位技術(shù)的理論分析與工程應(yīng)用[D];蘭州理工大學(xué);2008年

4 羅炳軍;高重心類結(jié)構(gòu)體的整體平移技術(shù)研究[D];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2392300