本文選題：傳統(tǒng)村落 + 分類��； 參考：《蘇州科技學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著城鎮(zhèn)化和城鄉(xiāng)一體化的迅猛推進，傳統(tǒng)村落正在以驚人的速度消失，如何更為科學高效地對其開展保護，極為重要且緊迫。傳統(tǒng)村落由于在格局、規(guī)模、風貌的保存現(xiàn)狀往往不及古村落，受到的重視程度也遠遠不如古村落，對其開展保護的研究也相對較少。本文認為，傳統(tǒng)村落具有經(jīng)濟、社會、文化、生態(tài)等方面的價值，不僅應得到嚴格保護，而且應依據(jù)價值的不同維度，開展分類保護、分層次管理和多元化利用。 蘇州的傳統(tǒng)村落數(shù)量多、分布廣，承載著大量的歷史信息，有著深厚的文化底蘊，具有重要價值；但由于生產(chǎn)方式、社會環(huán)境的變遷，政策層面的影響，，認識上、技術上的缺失，這些村落一方面?zhèn)鹘y(tǒng)的格局風貌已經(jīng)發(fā)生了很大的改變，另一方面蕭條破敗、與現(xiàn)代生活不相適應，淪落為“被遺忘的角落”，甚至已大量拆并消失。本文立足于歷時3個月對蘇州大量傳統(tǒng)村落開展的深入調(diào)研基礎之上，通過對傳統(tǒng)村落總體特征和價值維度的全面分析，構(gòu)建了蘇州傳統(tǒng)村落價值評價指標體系和分類模型，依據(jù)核心價值將蘇州分為傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)耕村落、歷史文化村落、田園人居村落和綜合型村落四種類型，進而分別探討了四種類型傳統(tǒng)村落在保護過程中的差異化需求，并從保護的方向、內(nèi)容、方法幾個方面探討了每種類型傳統(tǒng)村落的保護模式。論文選取蘇州三洋村、直塘社區(qū)、開弦弓村、三家市村為典型案例，對四種類型的傳統(tǒng)村落進行了實證研究，驗證了理論框架及技術方法的可行性和實踐價值。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of urbanization and urban-rural integration, traditional villages are disappearing at an alarming speed. How to protect them more scientifically and efficiently is extremely important and urgent. Because of the traditional villages in the pattern, scale, style and features of the preservation of the status quo is often less than the ancient villages, the degree of attention to the ancient villages is far less than the ancient villages, and the research on its protection is relatively less. This paper holds that traditional villages have economic, social, cultural and ecological values, which should not only be strictly protected, but also be protected according to different dimensions of value. The traditional villages in Suzhou have a large number and wide distribution, bearing a large amount of historical information, with profound cultural background, and of great value. However, due to the changes in the production mode, the social environment, the influence of the policy level, and the cognition, Due to the lack of technology, on the one hand, the traditional pattern of these villages has changed greatly, on the other hand, the depression is not in harmony with modern life, and it has been reduced to a "forgotten corner", and has even been demolished and disappeared in large numbers. Based on the in-depth investigation of a large number of traditional villages in Suzhou for three months, this paper constructs the evaluation index system and classification model of Suzhou traditional villages through the comprehensive analysis of the overall characteristics and value dimensions of the traditional villages. According to the core value, Suzhou is divided into four types: the traditional farming village, the historical and cultural village, the pastoral settlement village and the comprehensive village. The protection mode of each kind of traditional village is discussed from the direction, content and method of protection. This paper selects Sanyo Village, Zhitang Community, Kaixian bow Village and Sanjia City Village in Suzhou as typical cases, and makes an empirical study on four kinds of traditional villages, and verifies the feasibility and practical value of the theoretical framework and technical methods.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州科技學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU982.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陸林;葛敬炳;;徽州古村落形成與發(fā)展的地理環(huán)境研究[J];安徽師范大學學報(自然科學版);2007年03期

2 吳良鏞;;文化遺產(chǎn)保護與文化環(huán)境創(chuàng)造——為2007年6月9日中國文化遺產(chǎn)日寫[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年08期

3 陽建強;;江南水鄉(xiāng)古村的保護與發(fā)展——以常熟古村李市為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2009年07期

4 邵甬;付娟娟;;以價值為基礎的歷史文化村鎮(zhèn)綜合評價研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2012年02期

5 吳承照,肖建莉;古村落可持續(xù)發(fā)展的文化生態(tài)策略——以高遷古村落為例[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;2003年04期

6 阮儀三;袁菲;;江南水鄉(xiāng)古鎮(zhèn)的保護與合理發(fā)展[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2008年05期

7 邵甬;陳悅;姚軼峰;;華東地區(qū)歷史文化村鎮(zhèn)的特征及保護規(guī)劃研究[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2011年05期

8 張敏;;農(nóng)業(yè)景觀理論基礎探析[J];河南師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年02期

9 羅瑜斌;肖大威;;珠江三角洲歷史文化村鎮(zhèn)的類型及特征研究[J];華中建筑;2009年08期

10 楊眉;陸楣;;浙東歷史村落保護性開發(fā)規(guī)劃研究[J];華中建筑;2010年12期

本文編號：2034006