本文選題：財務(wù)共享服務(wù)模式 + 績效評價��； 參考：《天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著全球化趨勢的不斷深入,資源在全球配置的要求愈發(fā)強(qiáng)烈,跨國公司在這種宏觀背景下應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。如何使財務(wù)管理模式更有效的運(yùn)作,成為跨國公司必須研究的重要課題。目前,我國大部分企業(yè)仍然采用分級核算的會計計量模式,分散的核算點(diǎn)使得整個財務(wù)鏈條過長,核算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)參差不齊。另外,企業(yè)各個業(yè)務(wù)單位的財務(wù)人員對會計信息的處理能力各不相同,使得提供的財務(wù)信息沒有可比性。同時,財務(wù)人員兼任日常信息的收集處理工作,難以將精力集中在對業(yè)務(wù)決算的支持上。所以,我國企業(yè)也應(yīng)當(dāng)積極參與財務(wù)管理新模式的變革,才能緊隨市場步伐,在激烈的競爭中立于不敗之地。財務(wù)共享模式作為一種新型的財務(wù)管理模式,將標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的財務(wù)業(yè)務(wù)流程進(jìn)行集中和再造,由共享中心統(tǒng)一處理,具有極高的業(yè)務(wù)處理效率和客戶滿意度,但是我國財務(wù)共享模式的研究仍處于探索階段,與之相關(guān)聯(lián)的一系列問題也有待于不斷探索學(xué)習(xí),尤其是績效評價研究,因?yàn)榭冃гu價是確保企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)的重要控制措施,如果企業(yè)不能采用有效的績效評價方法,就不能促進(jìn)財務(wù)共享模式發(fā)揮最大效用。平衡計分卡是一種戰(zhàn)略管理系統(tǒng),它運(yùn)用的前提就是企業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)能夠?qū)訉臃纸?它適用于成本管理水平較高的企業(yè),所以運(yùn)用于企業(yè)集團(tuán)績效評價尤為有效,能夠從財務(wù)和非財務(wù)角度對企業(yè)績效進(jìn)行全面評價。因此,當(dāng)企業(yè)集團(tuán)引入財務(wù)共享模式的同時,必然選擇平衡計分卡這種創(chuàng)新的績效評價體制,以促進(jìn)財務(wù)共享模式更好的為企業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)服務(wù)。本文按照規(guī)范研究的模式,提出問題、分析原因、提出完善措施。首先總結(jié)財務(wù)共享模式以及績效評價的基本理論,分析國內(nèi)外財務(wù)共享模式下績效評價的研究現(xiàn)狀。然后,列舉了我國企業(yè)財務(wù)共享模式下績效評價的問題及原因。之后,借鑒了花旗銀行和漢高中國的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)。最后總結(jié)出完善我國企業(yè)財務(wù)共享模式下績效評價的措施。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the trend of globalization, the demand of resource allocation in the world becomes more and more intense, and multinational companies emerge as the times require under this macro background. How to make the financial management model more effective has become an important subject that multinational companies must study. At present, most enterprises in our country still adopt the accounting measurement mode of hierarchical accounting. The scattered accounting points make the whole financial chain too long and the accounting standards are not uniform. In addition, the financial personnel of each business unit have different ability to deal with accounting information, which makes the financial information not comparable. At the same time, it is difficult for financial personnel to concentrate on supporting business accounts because they are responsible for daily information collection and processing. Therefore, Chinese enterprises should take an active part in the reform of the new financial management mode so as to keep pace with the market and remain invincible in the fierce competition. As a new financial management mode, the financial sharing mode centralizes and reengineering the standardized financial business process, which is handled by the sharing center in a unified manner, which has a high business processing efficiency and customer satisfaction. However, the study of financial sharing mode in China is still in the exploratory stage, and a series of related problems need to be constantly explored and learned, especially the performance evaluation research. Because the performance evaluation is an important control measure to ensure the realization of the strategic goal of the enterprise, if the enterprise can not adopt the effective performance evaluation method, it can not promote the financial sharing mode to exert the maximum utility. Balanced Scorecard is a kind of strategic management system, which is based on the premise that the strategic objectives of an enterprise can be decomposed layer by layer. It is suitable for enterprises with higher cost management level, so it is especially effective in evaluating the performance of enterprise groups. Ability to evaluate corporate performance from both financial and non-financial perspectives. Therefore, when the enterprise group introduces the financial sharing model, it must choose the balanced Scorecard, which is an innovative performance evaluation system, in order to promote the financial sharing model to better serve the strategic objectives of the enterprise. According to the model of normative research, this paper puts forward the problems, analyzes the reasons and puts forward the perfect measures. Firstly, it summarizes the financial sharing model and the basic theory of performance evaluation, and analyzes the research status of performance evaluation under the financial sharing model at home and abroad. Then, the paper lists the problems and reasons of performance evaluation in the mode of financial sharing. After that, the successful experience of Citibank and Henkel China has been used for reference. Finally, the measures to improve the performance evaluation under the financial sharing mode of Chinese enterprises are summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F275

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張晉紅;;財務(wù)共享服務(wù)中心內(nèi)部績效測評與改進(jìn)——基于平衡計分卡的漢高中國區(qū)財務(wù)部門績效分析[J];財會通訊;2014年01期

2 王文文;于濤;;基于平衡計分卡的企業(yè)質(zhì)量績效指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2013年22期

3 何瑛;周訪;;我國企業(yè)集團(tuán)實(shí)施財務(wù)共享服務(wù)的關(guān)鍵因素的實(shí)證研究[J];會計研究;2013年10期

4 戴珂珂;;財務(wù)共享服務(wù)在企業(yè)財務(wù)管理中的應(yīng)用研究[J];中國商貿(mào);2013年29期

5 王征;王浩;;EVA與平衡計分卡的比較及綜合運(yùn)用[J];中國鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)會計;2013年07期

6 盧國志;;財務(wù)共享服務(wù)中心的實(shí)施條件和構(gòu)建策略研究[J];中國商貿(mào);2013年14期

7 翁曄;;淺談財務(wù)共享服務(wù)模式的若干問題和控制措施[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2012年30期

8 白勝;;平衡計分卡理論研究展望[J];財會月刊;2012年24期

9 王秀萍;張?zhí)硪?;財務(wù)共享服務(wù)存在的缺陷及其化解[J];財會月刊;2012年20期

10 鐘邦秀;;大型跨國集團(tuán)公司財務(wù)共享服務(wù)中心構(gòu)建模式研究[J];財會月刊;2012年14期

，

本文編號：2116761