本文選題：數(shù)理金融 + 魔法�。� 參考：《社會科學戰(zhàn)線》2011年06期

【摘要】：對于金融經(jīng)濟的分析研究目前有兩種方法,一種是立論于有效市場理論的數(shù)理金融的分析思考模式,另一種是哲學的分析思考模式。數(shù)理金融的分析研究模式使用最為廣泛,但實際應用效果卻差強人意,對比之下,從哲學角度分析思考金融現(xiàn)象雖然極少為人們所使用,但少數(shù)使用者卻獲得了極大的成功,索羅斯自稱自己首先是哲學家,金融市場只不過是驗證和實現(xiàn)其哲學理念的實驗室,并揶揄那種數(shù)理金融的分析研究努力注定永遠也不會成功。文章正是從哲學的角度分析研究金融經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)象,對目前數(shù)理金融的分析模式進行深刻反思,認為依據(jù)牛頓機械物理思考模式的數(shù)理金融分析研究方法,正嚴重傷害和制約著對金融經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)象更為本質(zhì)的認識和理解,其影響程度已經(jīng)到了不見得有任何好處的地步,金融經(jīng)濟學正成為施展魔法的世界,金融工具數(shù)學化、模型化不過是演繹魔法的高級道具,對此,人們必須有所認識,有所警醒,有所矯正,才能建立起金融監(jiān)管正確的哲學觀、歷史觀、價值觀。
[Abstract]:There are two methods for the analysis and research of financial economy, one is the analytical thinking mode of mathematical finance based on efficient market theory, the other is the analytical thinking mode of philosophy. The analytical research model of mathematical finance is the most widely used, but the practical application effect is not so satisfactory. In contrast, although the phenomenon of financial analysis and thinking from the philosophical point of view is seldom used by people, a few users have achieved great success. Soros claims to be a philosopher in the first place, and financial markets are merely a laboratory for testing and fulfilling his philosophy, and ridiculing the mathematical financial analytical effort that is doomed to never succeed. This paper analyzes and studies the phenomenon of finance and economy from the angle of philosophy, deeply reflects on the analysis mode of mathematical finance at present, and thinks that the research method of mathematical finance analysis is based on Newtonian mechanical physics thinking mode. It is seriously harming and restricting the understanding and understanding of the more essential financial and economic phenomena, and its influence degree has reached the point of not necessarily having any benefits. Financial economics is becoming a magical world, and financial instruments are becoming mathematical. Modeling is only the advanced props of deductive magic, to which people must have some understanding, warning, correction, in order to establish the correct view of philosophy, history and values of financial supervision.
【作者單位】： 對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學金融學院;
【分類號】：F830

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李秀敏;論亞相容邏輯中的“矛盾”——達科斯塔的亞相容邏輯思想述評[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年01期

2 文援朝;波普爾的錯誤觀述評[J];北京郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2001年04期

3 馬恒通;簡論圖書館學理論的評價與選擇[J];圖書與情報;1999年03期

4 蔣永福;;發(fā)展圖書館事業(yè)必須納入到政府議事日程——“五個納入”隨想[J];圖書與情報;2007年05期

5 張荷皎;;卡爾·波普爾科學哲學對教育研究的啟示[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

6 申仁洪;現(xiàn)代科學觀及其教育表象[J];重慶師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年05期

7 張俊芳,許修杰;從預成論到辯證決定論[J];東北師大學報(哲學社會科學版);1997年03期

8 蓋地,冷冰,楊晨輝;實證會計理論方法論探討[J];當代財經(jīng);2002年10期

9 張，

本文編號：2045524