【摘要】：農(nóng)民權(quán)是在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展及基因科學(xué)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步下，在世界植物遺傳資源從早期“資源共享”過(guò)渡到“農(nóng)民權(quán)獨(dú)享”的理念下，為保護(hù)各國(guó)農(nóng)民及農(nóng)民群體在植物遺傳資源保護(hù)上的貢獻(xiàn)而于1979年由FAO首次提出，農(nóng)民權(quán)作為一項(xiàng)新權(quán)利得到南北國(guó)家特別關(guān)注。農(nóng)民權(quán)核心是農(nóng)民的貢獻(xiàn)權(quán)益保護(hù)，農(nóng)民權(quán)載體是植物遺傳資源。本文重點(diǎn)對(duì)農(nóng)民權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性、權(quán)利內(nèi)容、權(quán)利實(shí)現(xiàn)以及我國(guó)對(duì)農(nóng)民權(quán)的立法問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入研究。國(guó)際上已有相關(guān)國(guó)際條約，，個(gè)別國(guó)家已通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)立法形式對(duì)農(nóng)民權(quán)進(jìn)行研究，但各持己見(jiàn)，爭(zhēng)議集中在農(nóng)民權(quán)屬于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)還是專屬權(quán)利，所以國(guó)際上尚沒(méi)有對(duì)農(nóng)民權(quán)的性質(zhì)、內(nèi)容和責(zé)任追究等問(wèn)題有統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識(shí)。我國(guó)《植物新品種保護(hù)條例》中雖對(duì)農(nóng)民權(quán)部分內(nèi)容有所涉及，但農(nóng)民權(quán)理念尚屬空白。本文是在國(guó)際植物遺傳資源各種保護(hù)爭(zhēng)端的背景下，在我國(guó)植物遺傳資源不斷受到“被侵權(quán)”的倒逼下，借鑒國(guó)際公約、各國(guó)立法規(guī)定，國(guó)內(nèi)研究理論及相關(guān)立法政策后，系統(tǒng)剖析農(nóng)民權(quán)問(wèn)題。 本文認(rèn)為，農(nóng)民權(quán)是排他性的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利，是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的相對(duì)物，是專屬權(quán)利。在植物遺傳資源可持續(xù)保護(hù)理論、農(nóng)民發(fā)展權(quán)理論、利益平衡理論等農(nóng)民權(quán)理論基礎(chǔ)的支撐下得出農(nóng)民權(quán)的內(nèi)容。它包括：農(nóng)民特權(quán)（農(nóng)民留種權(quán)、種子交換權(quán)、銷售權(quán)）、植物遺傳資源貢獻(xiàn)權(quán)、植物遺傳資源事先知情同意權(quán)、植物遺傳資源參與權(quán)、植物遺傳資源惠益分享權(quán)。根據(jù)對(duì)農(nóng)民權(quán)的多方面研究和我國(guó)農(nóng)民權(quán)尚屬空白的不利現(xiàn)狀，提出我國(guó)需要加入ITPGR公約，并在《植物新品種保護(hù)條例》專章中規(guī)定農(nóng)民權(quán)。農(nóng)民權(quán)體現(xiàn)四大立法原則，分別是農(nóng)民貢獻(xiàn)權(quán)保護(hù)原則、植物遺傳資源主權(quán)原則、惠益分享原則、生物多樣性及可持續(xù)發(fā)展原則。在農(nóng)民權(quán)立法中需加強(qiáng)具體制度的制定：明確農(nóng)民權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性和權(quán)利主體，明確農(nóng)民權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍，權(quán)利內(nèi)容，建立農(nóng)民權(quán)實(shí)現(xiàn)制度，建立農(nóng)民權(quán)鏈條保護(hù)機(jī)制和貿(mào)易安全預(yù)警機(jī)制，并建立侵權(quán)責(zé)任追究制度。該項(xiàng)研究將填補(bǔ)我國(guó)農(nóng)民權(quán)立法空白，保護(hù)我國(guó)遺傳資源和為此付出努力的農(nóng)民權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:Farmer's right is under the development of economy and the progress of gene science and technology, under the idea that the plant genetic resources of the world transition from "resource sharing" to "farmer's right to enjoy" in the early period. In order to protect the contribution of farmers and their groups to the conservation of plant genetic resources, it was first proposed by FAO in 1979. As a new right, farmers' rights have been paid special attention to by the north and south countries. The core of farmers' rights is the protection of farmers' contribution rights, and the carrier of farmers' rights is plant genetic resources. This paper focuses on the property, content, realization and legislation of farmers' rights. There have been relevant international treaties in the world, and individual countries have conducted research on farmers' rights through domestic legislation, but they hold their own opinions. The dispute focuses on whether farmers' rights belong to intellectual property rights or exclusive rights, so there is no international nature of farmers' rights. There is a unified understanding of issues such as content and accountability. Although some contents of farmers' rights are involved in the regulations on the Protection of New Plant varieties, the concept of farmers' rights is still blank. This article is under the background of various kinds of protection disputes of international plant genetic resources, under the constant pressure of "being infringed" on the plant genetic resources of our country, drawing lessons from the international convention, the national legislation stipulation, the domestic research theory and the related legislation policy, Systematic analysis of the issue of farmers' rights. This paper holds that the farmer's right is the exclusive property right, the opposite of intellectual property right and the exclusive right. Based on the theory of sustainable protection of plant genetic resources, the theory of farmers' right to development and the theory of balance of interests, the contents of farmers' rights are obtained. It includes: farmer's privilege (farmer's right to remain seed, right of seed exchange, right of sale), right of contribution of plant genetic resource, right of prior informed consent of plant genetic resource, right of participation of plant genetic resource, right of benefit-sharing of plant genetic resource. According to the research on farmers' rights in many aspects and the unfavorable situation that the farmers' rights are still blank in our country, it is pointed out that our country should join the ITPGR convention and stipulate the farmers' rights in the special chapter of Plant New Variety Protection regulations. Farmer's right embodies four legislative principles, namely, the protection of farmers' contribution right, the sovereignty of plant genetic resources, the principle of benefit-sharing, the principle of biodiversity and the principle of sustainable development. In the legislation of farmers' rights, we should strengthen the establishment of specific systems: clarifying the property and subject of farmers' rights, defining the scope of protection and contents of farmers' rights, establishing the system of realizing farmers' rights. Establish the protection mechanism of farmers' right chain and trade security early warning mechanism, and establish the system of investigating tort liability. This study will fill in the gaps in the legislation of farmers' rights, protect the genetic resources and the rights and interests of farmers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳靜芝;;農(nóng)民權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制探析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2012年10期

2 丁德昌;;論農(nóng)民發(fā)展權(quán)保護(hù)的政府責(zé)任[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

3 張建邦;生物基因資源獲取和利益分享的國(guó)際法規(guī)制──兼論對(duì)我國(guó)基因資源保護(hù)的啟示[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

4 李長(zhǎng)健;伍文輝;;基于農(nóng)民權(quán)益保護(hù)的社區(qū)發(fā)展權(quán)理論研究[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

5 楊紅朝;;遺傳資源權(quán)視野下的我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)遺傳資源保護(hù)探究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

6 吳漢東;關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本體、主體與客體的重新認(rèn)識(shí)——以財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)為比較研究對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年05期

7 趙瑾;;農(nóng)民權(quán)和生物與遺傳資源保護(hù)關(guān)系探析[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年05期

8 嚴(yán)永和;;目前遺傳資源和傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)法律保護(hù)機(jī)制國(guó)際探索的成就與不足——評(píng)CBD事先知情同意機(jī)制和FAO農(nóng)民權(quán)機(jī)制[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

9 孫昊亮;;論我國(guó)遺傳資源區(qū)域性補(bǔ)償法律制度的構(gòu)建[J];河北法學(xué);2008年07期

10 王華芳;;遺傳資源惠益分享合同研究[J];河北法學(xué);2008年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張彩霞;植物品種權(quán)許可實(shí)施問(wèn)題研究[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

2 呂祥熙;林業(yè)植物新品種保護(hù)制度研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

3 趙麗;國(guó)際多邊條約知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

4 吳睿;論農(nóng)民的法定權(quán)利及其實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：2401091