發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-15 13:03

【摘要】：如今的世界是知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,新興領(lǐng)域科技發(fā)展對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域帶來(lái)了極大的沖擊,不同的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)之間的矛盾越來(lái)越突出,尤其是商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)之間的糾紛,嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了社會(huì)利益。本文在深入分析商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)利沖突的基礎(chǔ)上,闡述了商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的基本理論,總結(jié)了一些解決權(quán)利沖突的原則,并且提出立法以及司法建議,希望給商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)沖突的解決提供一定的參考。 作者首先分析了商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)的理論含義及特點(diǎn),在此基礎(chǔ)上將商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突界定為兩個(gè)權(quán)利主客體之間出現(xiàn)的矛盾的法律狀態(tài)和主體利益間的抵觸關(guān)系。商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突類(lèi)型的種類(lèi)繁多,按照客體的性質(zhì)劃分,主要包括了文字商標(biāo)與文字作品、圖形商標(biāo)與平面美術(shù)和攝影作品、商標(biāo)與虛擬角色名稱(chēng)、立體商標(biāo)與建筑和雕塑作品以及聲音商標(biāo)與音樂(lè)作品等常見(jiàn)類(lèi)型。產(chǎn)生商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)發(fā)生沖突的原因主要包含了內(nèi)在原因,制度原因和其他原因三方面的內(nèi)容。 我國(guó)法律在立法方面存在的問(wèn)題首先是未明確規(guī)定禁止將與他人在先權(quán)利沖突的標(biāo)記作為商標(biāo)使用或注冊(cè),其次是到目前為止尚未確定在先著作權(quán)的范圍,最后是《商標(biāo)法》中關(guān)于申請(qǐng)登記注冊(cè)程序的規(guī)定中沒(méi)有區(qū)分商標(biāo)注冊(cè)人的善惡意。在司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題則是司法機(jī)關(guān)過(guò)于絕對(duì)地保護(hù)在先著作權(quán),對(duì)于在后的商標(biāo)權(quán)人有失公平,而且造成社會(huì)資源的浪費(fèi)；我國(guó)采用的是分散型單行立法體例,關(guān)于商標(biāo)的檢索審查機(jī)制尚不完備也是有待提高的地方。利用比較分析法對(duì)域外有關(guān)商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)和條約規(guī)定進(jìn)行了梳理,結(jié)果表明域外立法對(duì)商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的解決方法主要采用的是禁止使用、不予注冊(cè)和予以撤銷(xiāo)三種處理方式,解決途徑又可以分為事前救濟(jì)和事后救濟(jì)兩方面。 針對(duì)上面分析得出的問(wèn)題,筆者針對(duì)我國(guó)法律存在的問(wèn)題提出了若干解決原則并給出了一些立法和司法方面的建議,在立法方面主要是確定在先著作權(quán)的權(quán)力范圍和在立法層面上區(qū)分商標(biāo)注冊(cè)人的善惡意。而在司法實(shí)踐中則需要建立補(bǔ)償制度并且通過(guò)行政途徑來(lái)加以解決,當(dāng)然也可以采用諸如利益共同化和加強(qiáng)有關(guān)部門(mén)的合作等方式來(lái)提高沖突的解決能力。
[Abstract]:Today's world is an era of knowledge economy. The development of science and technology in new fields has brought great impact to the field of intellectual property. The contradictions between different intellectual property rights are becoming more and more prominent, especially the disputes between trademark rights and prior copyright. It has seriously damaged the interests of society. On the basis of deeply analyzing the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright interest, this paper expounds the basic theory of the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright right, summarizes some principles to resolve the conflict of rights, and puts forward some legislative and judicial suggestions. The author hopes to provide some reference for the solution of the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright. The author first analyzes the theoretical meaning and characteristics of trademark right and prior copyright. On this basis, the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright right is defined as the conflict between the subject and object of the two rights and the conflict between the interests of the subject and the subject. There are many types of conflicts between trademark rights and prior copyright rights, which are divided according to the nature of the object, including characters and works, graphic marks and graphic art and photographic works, trademarks and fictitious role names. Three-dimensional trademarks and architectural and sculpture works as well as sound trademarks and musical works and other common types. The causes of conflicts between trademark rights and prior copyright mainly include three aspects: internal reasons, institutional reasons and other reasons. The problems in the legislation of our country are, first, the lack of explicit provisions prohibiting the use or registration of marks that conflict with the prior rights of others as trademarks, and secondly, the scope of prior copyright has not been determined so far. Finally, the provisions of Trademark Law on registration procedures do not distinguish between the good and malicious of the trademark registrant. The problem in the judicial practice is that the judicial organ is too absolute to protect the prior copyright, which is unfair to the latter trademark owner, and causes the waste of social resources. In our country, the single-line legislation method is used, and the examination mechanism of trademark retrieval is not perfect and needs to be improved. The comparative analysis method is used to sort out the relevant laws and regulations and treaty provisions about trademark right and prior copyright. The result shows that the main way to solve the conflict between trademark right and prior copyright right is to prohibit the use of the trademark right. The solution can be divided into two aspects: ex ante relief and ex post relief. In view of the problems analyzed above, the author puts forward some principles to solve the problems existing in our country's laws, and gives some suggestions on legislation and judicature. In the aspect of legislation, it is mainly to determine the scope of power of prior copyright and to distinguish the good and malice of trademark registrants. In judicial practice, it is necessary to establish a compensation system and solve it through administrative means. Of course, we can also improve the ability of conflict resolution by such means as co-interest and strengthening the cooperation of relevant departments.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.43;D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 芮松艷;;商標(biāo)在先權(quán)利效力確定的時(shí)間標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年05期

2 高榮林;;向前看:解決商標(biāo)權(quán)與著作權(quán)沖突的另一種思路[J];中華商標(biāo);2010年11期

3 屈茂輝;;論民法上的注意義務(wù)[J];北方法學(xué);2007年01期

4 馮曉青;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問(wèn)題研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

5 劉亞軍;曹軍婧;;虛擬角色商品化權(quán)法律保護(hù)芻議——美國(guó)實(shí)踐的啟示[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年04期

6 郝鐵川;權(quán)利沖突:一個(gè)不成為問(wèn)題的問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2004年09期

7 李彥閣;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突典型案例與解析[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年16期

8 陳碧賢;;論商標(biāo)注冊(cè)不當(dāng)?shù)姆韶?zé)任[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

9 劉暢;;從一起案件看著作權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)之爭(zhēng)[J];中華商標(biāo);2013年08期

10 張紅霄;著作權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)的重疊和分界——由一則案例引發(fā)的思考[J];法學(xué);1996年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2333384