【摘要】：我國專利法實(shí)施已有二十一年的時間，現(xiàn)行專利法被學(xué)界認(rèn)為是我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律中制定最為成功的一部，但這部專利法中未對世界各國專利法普遍規(guī)定的專利間接侵權(quán)行為做出規(guī)定，在實(shí)踐中，這種侵權(quán)行為不僅屢見不鮮，而且隨著科技的不斷進(jìn)步，專利侵權(quán)行為人侵權(quán)手段越來越隱蔽，專利間接侵權(quán)行為有愈演愈烈的趨勢，因此，專利間接侵權(quán)行為相關(guān)問題的研究成為理論和實(shí)踐都極為需要的一個課題。本文以專利間接侵權(quán)概念為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，通過對各國專利間接侵權(quán)立法的比較研究，探討了專利間接侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則、構(gòu)成要件兩大問題，，指出民法典草案知識產(chǎn)權(quán)篇中專利間接侵權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定的不足，并提出了完善其不足之處的建議。 本文包括五部分。第一部分是對專利間接侵權(quán)概念的解析。本部分首先介紹了侵權(quán)行為法中間接侵權(quán)的概念，筆者認(rèn)為，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)間接侵權(quán)具有侵權(quán)關(guān)系雙重性和侵權(quán)間接性的特征，因此，在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的間接侵權(quán)發(fā)生的頻率較其他領(lǐng)域中的間接侵權(quán)的發(fā)生頻率為高，專利間接侵權(quán)的發(fā)生則更為普遍；其次介紹了專利間接侵權(quán)概念形成的背景，以及有關(guān)專利間接侵權(quán)最早的判例；最后，筆者提出對專利間接侵權(quán)的定義，并對比專利直接侵權(quán)和共同侵權(quán)的概念對其加以解釋。 第二部分是專利間接侵權(quán)國際立法比較。本部分首先分別介紹了美國、英國、德國、歐盟、日本關(guān)于專利間接侵權(quán)的立法與判例；筆者認(rèn)為，雖然上述國家和地區(qū)對于專利間接侵權(quán)的定義有相似之處，但各國對于專利間接侵權(quán)行為提供的關(guān)鍵部件或必要條件的范圍、專利間接侵權(quán)人的主觀過錯、專利間接
[Abstract]:It has been 21 years since China's patent law was implemented. The current patent law is considered by scholars to be the most successful one of the intellectual property laws in China. However, this patent law does not provide for indirect patent infringement, which is generally stipulated in patent law of various countries in the world. In practice, this kind of infringement is not only common, but also with the continuous progress of science and technology. The infringement means of patent tortfeasors are becoming more and more covert, and the indirect patent infringement is becoming more and more serious. Therefore, the research on the problems related to patent indirect infringement has become a subject that both theory and practice need very much. This paper takes the concept of indirect patent infringement as the starting point, through the comparative study of the legislation of patent indirect infringement in various countries, discusses the principle of imputation of patent indirect infringement and the two major problems of constitution elements. This paper points out the shortcomings of the relevant provisions on indirect patent infringement in the draft intellectual property Law of the Civil Code, and puts forward some suggestions for its perfection. This paper includes five parts. The first part is the analysis of the concept of patent indirect infringement. This part first introduces the concept of indirect tort in tort law. The author believes that indirect infringement of intellectual property rights has the characteristics of dual nature of tort and indirect infringement. The frequency of indirect infringement in the field of intellectual property is higher than that in other fields, and the indirect infringement of patent is more common. Secondly, the background of the formation of the concept of indirect infringement of patent is introduced. Finally, the author puts forward the definition of indirect patent infringement and explains it by comparing the concepts of direct patent infringement and joint infringement. The second part is the international legislation comparison of patent indirect infringement. This part first introduces the legislation and precedents of indirect patent infringement in the United States, Britain, Germany, European Union and Japan respectively. The author thinks that although the definition of indirect patent infringement is similar in these countries and regions, However, the scope of the key components or necessary conditions provided by various countries for indirect patent infringement, the subjective fault of the patent indirect infringer, and the patent indirect
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D923.42

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 賈銀萍;專利的間接侵權(quán)問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年

2 張世莎;專利間接侵權(quán)制度研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2013年

本文編號：2228800