【摘要】：著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)行為是行為人沒有實施受知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專有權(quán)利控制的行為,但卻為他人實施侵害專有權(quán)利的行為提供幫助或者教唆、引誘他人實施侵害專有權(quán)利的行為。實施間接侵權(quán)行為,導致直接侵權(quán)行為發(fā)生并造成損害后果,應(yīng)當承擔間接侵權(quán)責任。 確立間接侵權(quán)制度,清晰界定間接侵權(quán)行為及間接侵權(quán)責任,對視頻分享網(wǎng)站服務(wù)提供者等的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)時的權(quán)利義務(wù)通過完整規(guī)范的理論體系予以界定,不僅是保障數(shù)字環(huán)境下著作權(quán)人和相關(guān)鄰接權(quán)人的基礎(chǔ)權(quán)利的必要條件,更是網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者履行相關(guān)責任的前提。間接侵權(quán)不同于直接侵權(quán)和共同侵權(quán),在內(nèi)容、因果關(guān)系、責任承擔和立法適用上與直接侵權(quán)和共同侵權(quán)均有本質(zhì)的差別。網(wǎng)絡(luò)的無縫傳播和侵權(quán)后果的不可逆性,是確立著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)制度的環(huán)境背景；侵權(quán)責任法對侵權(quán)行為的規(guī)制范圍在社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展和司法實踐中不斷擴大,是確立間接侵權(quán)制度的歷史背景。 對視頻分享網(wǎng)站的間接侵權(quán)行為的規(guī)制,應(yīng)當注重版權(quán)保護與技術(shù)革新之間的平衡,避免給予網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者過重的責任。視頻分享網(wǎng)站服務(wù)提供者承擔“善良管理人”的注意義務(wù),行為人應(yīng)當具有其所屬行業(yè)或職業(yè)、專業(yè)資格等對其行為的客觀性要求。同時,結(jié)合中國特色的版權(quán)保護體制,適當采用行政措施來緩解侵權(quán)糾紛為網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻行業(yè)造成的困擾。在著作權(quán)責任限制方面,“避風港規(guī)則”是抗辯事由,而非免責事由。適用“避風港規(guī)則”進行抗辯的前提其在明知或者應(yīng)知侵權(quán)視頻內(nèi)容后積極采取必要措施。另外,對“避風港規(guī)則”的具體適用條件應(yīng)當做明確具體的限制性規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The indirect infringement of copyright is an act by which the perpetrator does not carry out the control of the exclusive right of intellectual property, but provides aid or abetting for others to infringe upon the exclusive right, and induces others to carry out the act of infringing upon the exclusive right. Indirect tort shall be liable for indirect tort, which results in direct tort and damages. Establish the system of indirect infringement, clearly define the indirect tort and indirect tort liability, and define the rights and obligations of network service providers such as video-sharing website service providers through a complete normative theoretical system. It is not only a necessary condition to protect the basic rights of copyright owners and related neighbors in the digital environment, but also a prerequisite for network service providers to fulfill their relevant responsibilities. Indirect tort is different from direct tort and joint tort. It is essentially different from direct tort and joint tort in content, causality, liability and application of legislation. The seamless dissemination of the network and irreversibility of the consequences of infringement are the environmental background of establishing the system of indirect copyright infringement, and the scope of tort regulation by tort liability law is constantly expanded in the development of social economy and judicial practice. It is the historical background of establishing indirect tort system. To regulate the indirect infringement of video-sharing website, we should pay attention to the balance between copyright protection and technological innovation, and avoid giving too much responsibility to network service providers. The service provider of video sharing website undertakes the duty of attention of "good administrator", and the actor should have the objectivity requirement of his or her own profession or occupation, professional qualification and so on. At the same time, combined with the copyright protection system with Chinese characteristics, appropriate administrative measures are adopted to alleviate the troubles caused by infringement disputes for the network video industry. In the limitation of copyright liability, the Haven Rule is a defense, not an exemption. The premise of applying the "safe haven rule" is to take necessary measures after knowing or should know about the infringing video content. In addition, the specific application conditions of the safe harbour rules should be clearly defined and restricted.
【學位授予單位】：北京郵電大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李欲曉;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)治理與信息社會法律的研究對象和目標[J];北京郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2010年01期

2 胡堅;美國保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的新動向——評美國《司法部知識產(chǎn)權(quán)工作組報告》[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年05期

3 芮松艷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站的侵權(quán)責任認定——由華夏樹人訴優(yōu)酷網(wǎng)案著手[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年04期

4 王遷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究[J];法商研究;2008年04期

5 吳漢東;;侵權(quán)責任法視野下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期

6 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學;2005年12期

7 胡開忠;;“避風港規(guī)則”在視頻分享網(wǎng)站版權(quán)侵權(quán)認定中的適用[J];法學;2009年12期

8 牛強;;變動的注意義務(wù):視頻分享網(wǎng)站過失評判的新范式[J];法治研究;2010年01期

9 謝惠加;;試論著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則的法定化——兼論著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則的經(jīng)濟分析[J];河北法學;2007年02期

10 楊利華,馮曉青;著作權(quán)擴張及其法律和經(jīng)濟學探討[J];法學論壇;2005年03期

，

本文編號：2204982