【摘要】：伴隨著社會發(fā)展,科技不斷進(jìn)步,競爭的核心越來越體現(xiàn)在對高端技術(shù)的掌控上,因而對專利權(quán)的保護(hù)也越來越受到關(guān)注。專利侵權(quán)訴訟和專利無效是專利制度的重要內(nèi)容,兩者關(guān)系密切。但我國依據(jù)職權(quán)分開原則建立的專利制度,使得專利侵權(quán)訴訟的審理由人民法院負(fù)責(zé),專利無效的審查由國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局專利復(fù)審委員會負(fù)責(zé)。這種職權(quán)分開的后果是專利權(quán)侵權(quán)訴訟程序常常因為等待專利無效的結(jié)果而一直被中止,造成專利權(quán)長期處于不穩(wěn)定狀態(tài),同時也影響專利案件處理的公平和效率。我國目前的專利侵權(quán)訴訟與專利無效審理模式在我國專利糾紛越來越多,社會公眾對糾紛處理的公平和效率的要求不斷增強(qiáng)的情形下,正凸顯其弊端。最大問題在于密切相關(guān)聯(lián)的專利侵權(quán)訴訟與專利無效程序得不到協(xié)調(diào)解決,兩個程序的銜接嚴(yán)重缺乏,影響專利案件的有效解決。 而在現(xiàn)在我國專利侵權(quán)訴訟與專利無效宣告的審理模式下,“循環(huán)訴訟”問題長期存在,這一直是我國專利無效程序中的難題。不但使得專利無效案件的審理長時間拖延,行政和司法資源都被耗費,卻還是不能有效地解決問題,使得專利權(quán)不穩(wěn)定,不但損害當(dāng)事人權(quán)益還損害了社會公共利益。為了更好地解決當(dāng)事人之間的爭端,維護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益和社會公共利益,節(jié)約行政和司法資源的耗費,有效快速地解決專利無效案件中的“循環(huán)訴訟”問題是非常關(guān)鍵的。因此,如何完善我國專利侵權(quán)訴訟與專利無效審理模式就顯得至關(guān)重要。 本文從“循環(huán)訴訟”導(dǎo)致專利侵權(quán)訴訟久拖不決切入主題,先從我國的職能分開的專利制度分析專利無效與中止訴訟,再闡述“循環(huán)訴訟”如何產(chǎn)生,并通過案列看“循環(huán)訴訟”會造成怎樣的后果。 文章的第二部分分析了要解決我國現(xiàn)階段專利侵權(quán)訴訟與專利無效宣告審理模式的問題,必須先厘清專利權(quán)本身的性質(zhì)以及確認(rèn)專利權(quán)有效性糾紛的性質(zhì)。專利權(quán)具有特殊的屬性,其本質(zhì)屬性是私權(quán),但是又帶有一定得公權(quán)性質(zhì)。學(xué)界對確認(rèn)專利權(quán)有效性糾紛的性質(zhì)也有不同的學(xué)說,包括民事糾紛說、行政糾紛說和準(zhǔn)司法模式說。 文章的第三部分是主要國家和地區(qū)的專利侵權(quán)訴訟與專利無效宣告審理模式。該部分主要介紹了美國、德國、日本、法國的專利侵權(quán)與專利無效審理制度以及發(fā)展趨勢,重點論述了美國聯(lián)邦巡回上訴法院、德國聯(lián)邦專利法院、日本知識產(chǎn)權(quán)高等法院、法國完全依據(jù)民事訴訟程序?qū)o效案件進(jìn)行審理的模式,為我國審理模式的完善提供借鑒。 文章的第四部分是對我國審理模式完善的探討,分析了我國學(xué)者提出的相關(guān)改革方案,比如建立專利上訴法院、建立專門的專利法院等,并對我國現(xiàn)階段的合理模式提出建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of society and the progress of science and technology, the core of competition is more and more in the control of high-end technology, so the protection of patent rights has been paid more and more attention. Patent infringement litigation and patent invalidation are important contents of patent system, and they are closely related. However, the patent system established according to the principle of separation of functions and powers makes the people's court responsible for the trial of patent infringement litigation and the patent review board of the State intellectual property Office for the examination of patent invalidity. The consequence of this separation of powers is that patent infringement proceedings are often suspended because of waiting for the result of patent invalidation, which causes the patent rights to be unstable for a long time, and also affects the fairness and efficiency of handling patent cases. The current patent infringement litigation and patent invalidation trial mode in our country is more and more patent disputes, the social public demand for fairness and efficiency of dispute processing is increasing, which is highlighting its drawbacks. The biggest problem lies in the fact that the closely related patent infringement litigation and the patent invalid procedure can not be solved harmoniously, and the connection between the two procedures is seriously lacking, which affects the effective solution of the patent case. However, under the trial mode of patent infringement litigation and patent invalidation declaration in our country, the problem of "circular litigation" has existed for a long time, which has always been a difficult problem in the patent invalidation procedure of our country. It not only makes the patent invalid cases long time delay, administrative and judicial resources are consumed, but also can not effectively solve the problem, make patent unstable, not only damage the rights and interests of the parties but also the public interests. In order to better solve the dispute between the parties, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and the public interests of the parties, save the cost of administrative and judicial resources, and effectively and quickly solve the problem of "circular litigation" in patent invalidation cases, it is very crucial. Therefore, how to perfect our patent infringement litigation and patent invalid trial mode is very important. In this paper, the author analyzes the patent invalidation and suspension litigation from the patent system of function separation in our country, and then expounds how to produce the "circular litigation", which leads to the patent infringement litigation caused by "circular litigation" for a long time. And through the case list to see the "circular litigation" what kind of consequences. The second part of the article analyzes the problem of patent infringement litigation and patent invalidation trial mode in our country at present, we must clarify the nature of patent right itself and confirm the nature of patent validity dispute. Patent right has special attribute, its essence attribute is private right, but also has certain public right nature. Scholars also have different theories on the nature of patent validity dispute, including civil dispute theory, administrative dispute theory and quasi-judicial model theory. The third part is the trial mode of patent infringement litigation and patent invalidation in main countries and regions. This part mainly introduces the patent infringement and patent invalidation trial system and its development trend in America, Germany, Japan and France, and mainly discusses the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, the German Federal Patent Court, the Japanese intellectual property High Court. France completely according to the civil procedure to the invalid cases trial mode, for our country trial model to provide reference. The fourth part of the article discusses the perfection of the trial mode of our country, analyzes the relevant reform schemes put forward by Chinese scholars, such as the establishment of patent appeal court and the establishment of special patent court, and puts forward some suggestions on the reasonable mode of our country at present stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42;D925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 包海波 ,盛世豪;20世紀(jì)80年代以來美國專利制度創(chuàng)新及其績效[J];科技與法律;2002年04期

2 錢玉林;禁止權(quán)利濫用的法理分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

3 馮曉青,劉淑華;試論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的私權(quán)屬性及其公權(quán)化趨向[J];中國法學(xué);2004年01期

4 胡海平;關(guān)于專利無效宣告案件相關(guān)法律問題的探討[J];情報雜志;2004年10期

，

本文編號：2172649