【摘要】：科學(xué)技術(shù)是第一生產(chǎn)力，這是在經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的今天，各國(guó)政府都達(dá)成的一個(gè)共識(shí)。在科技的推動(dòng)下，計(jì)算機(jī)的應(yīng)用得到了更廣泛的推廣，并帶動(dòng)著相關(guān)的軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)。我國(guó)的軟件開發(fā)是從上世紀(jì)70年代末開始，由于起步較晚，這一新興產(chǎn)業(yè)從初期就受到國(guó)外擠壓、國(guó)內(nèi)研究資金不足、人才短缺等因素的制約，步履維艱。伴隨著計(jì)算機(jī)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展，軟件市場(chǎng)需求量的擴(kuò)大，且軟件復(fù)制成本低、技術(shù)容易掌握的特點(diǎn)，軟件的盜版問(wèn)題日益突出，成為越來(lái)越多人的謀利手段。一般情況下，軟件盜版的類型可分為：硬盤預(yù)裝盜版、軟件仿冒盜版、光盤盜版、企業(yè)盜版、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)盜版、不同個(gè)體間混合盜版等。為了解決日益嚴(yán)重的盜版現(xiàn)狀，我國(guó)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)重要組成部分的《中華人民共和國(guó)著作權(quán)法》進(jìn)行修訂，確立了符合國(guó)際版權(quán)保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的版權(quán)保護(hù)體系。除了著作權(quán)法，還有專業(yè)部門的法律法規(guī)即《計(jì)算機(jī)軟件保護(hù)條例》。但盡管如此，我國(guó)的盜版率依舊在各國(guó)中名列前茅。美國(guó)商業(yè)軟件聯(lián)盟（BAS）[1]2010年公布的全球主要國(guó)家盜版率：中國(guó)2009年盜版率為79%，排名27。雖然較1994年的97%下降較多，但與盜版率最低的美國(guó)（20%）仍有較大差距（本段有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)來(lái)源見第一頁(yè)注釋1）。 在美國(guó)強(qiáng)大的壓力下我們就一定要將盜版的標(biāo)尺生硬地抬高到與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家相同的水平嗎？版權(quán)要保護(hù)，，但按照傳統(tǒng)的中庸思想，保護(hù)與打擊之間應(yīng)有一個(gè)合情合理的過(guò)度。法律的制定不但要公平公正，更要兼顧到效率和效益。 因此，文章將會(huì)從社會(huì)利益、個(gè)人利益等方面出發(fā)，基于我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀對(duì)盜版軟件的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、侵權(quán)判定、立法操作和司法實(shí)踐上進(jìn)行探索和研究。軟件盜版的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與一般軟件侵權(quán)既有共性，又有差異。從理論上講，對(duì)盜版軟件的侵權(quán)認(rèn)定必須滿足四個(gè)條件：即存在侵權(quán)的損害事實(shí)；實(shí)施侵權(quán)行為；侵權(quán)行為與損害結(jié)果之間存在因果關(guān)系；侵權(quán)人存在主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)。從實(shí)踐上講，認(rèn)定是否構(gòu)成軟件盜版，還有以下方法：1、可通過(guò)與正版軟件進(jìn)行盤面內(nèi)同比較或?qū)Ρ任募�、目錄�?、對(duì)比安裝過(guò)程；3、對(duì)比安裝后的目錄、文件、使用過(guò)程；4、對(duì)比代碼的方式。此外，文章在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行比較的基礎(chǔ)上，提出完善我國(guó)軟件保護(hù)的法律對(duì)策，借以希望能對(duì)我國(guó)軟件發(fā)展提供更全面的保護(hù)。例如，在民法上注重保護(hù)“階梯”平衡、明確反向工程規(guī)定；在刑法上細(xì)化盜版犯罪入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、加大刑罰力度；在行政上促進(jìn)政府扶植軟件創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)業(yè)等。
[Abstract]:Science and technology is the first productive force, which is a consensus reached by governments in today's economic integration. Under the impetus of science and technology, the application of computer has been popularized more widely, and has driven the related software industry. The software development of our country began at the end of 1970s. Due to the late start, this new industry has been squeezed by foreign countries from the initial stage, the domestic research fund is insufficient, the talent shortage and so on factors restrict, and so on. With the development of computer industry, the expansion of software market demand, and the low cost of software replication, easy to grasp the characteristics of technology, software piracy has become increasingly prominent, becoming a more and more people's means of profit. In general, the types of software piracy can be divided into: hard disk preinstalled piracy, software counterfeiting piracy, CD piracy, corporate piracy, Internet piracy, different individuals mixed piracy and so on. In order to solve the increasingly serious piracy situation, the copyright Law of the people's Republic of China, which is an important part of intellectual property rights, has been amended to establish a copyright protection system that conforms to the international standards of copyright protection. In addition to copyright law, there are professional departments of laws and regulations, that is, computer software protection regulations. Nevertheless, our country's piracy rate is still among the highest in all countries. The US Business Software Alliance (BAS) published the worldwide piracy rate for major countries in 2010: China's 2009 piracy rate was 79, ranking 27th. Although down from 97 percent in 1994, there is still a big gap with the United States, which has the lowest piracy rate (20 percent) (see note 1 on page 1 for the relevant data for this paragraph). Under the strong pressure of the United States, we must stiffly raise the scale of piracy to the same level as developed countries. Copyright should be protected, but according to the traditional doctrine of moderation, there should be a reasonable excess between protection and strike. The formulation of the law should not only be fair and equitable, but also take into account efficiency and effectiveness. Therefore, based on the present situation of economic and social development in our country, the paper will explore and study the standards of copyright software, the judgment of infringement, the operation of legislation and the practice of judicature from the aspects of social interests and personal interests. The standard of software piracy is not only common but also different with general software infringement. Theoretically speaking, the infringement of pirated software must meet four conditions: the existence of infringement of the fact of damage; the implementation of tort; tort and damage between the causal relationship between the result of the infringement; the infringer has subjective fault. In practice, to determine whether software piracy constitutes, there are the following methods: 1, you can compare or contrast the file name in the disk with the original version of the software, the directory is 2, compare the installation process 3, compare the directory, file, and use process after installation; 4, contrast the way of code. In addition, on the basis of the comparison of domestic and foreign research status, the article puts forward the legal countermeasures to perfect the software protection in our country, hoping to provide more comprehensive protection to the software development of our country. For example, in the civil law, we should pay attention to the balance of the "ladder" of protection, clarify the provisions of reverse engineering; refine the standard of criminal conviction of piracy in criminal law, increase the intensity of punishment; and promote the government to foster the software innovation industry in administration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邱均平,陳敬全;中、美計(jì)算機(jī)軟件知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的比較分析[J];圖書與情報(bào);2001年02期

2 湯黎明,陳惠珍,徐俊;淺議知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)訴訟舉證責(zé)任分配規(guī)則[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年12期

3 秦孌孌;孫大偉;;淺論計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的法律保護(hù)[J];福建電腦;2010年08期

4 李曉;;中美知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護(hù)比較研究[J];法律適用;2006年05期

5 周根才;高毅龍;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)中損害賠償數(shù)額的確定[J];法律適用;2008年12期

6 曾雋;;對(duì)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件屬性和保護(hù)方式的認(rèn)識(shí)[J];才智;2012年31期

7 羅曉丹;;論計(jì)算機(jī)軟件知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)模式的優(yōu)化[J];計(jì)算機(jī)光盤軟件與應(yīng)用;2012年23期

8 朱妙春;;甕鱉逃亡——H公司侵犯計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)調(diào)解紀(jì)實(shí)[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2013年01期

9 楊永;何輝利;李穎;;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件法律保護(hù)[J];河北理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

10 張春艷;;論著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償額確定中舉證責(zé)任的分配[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 本報(bào)記者 張偉勛;[N];中國(guó)貿(mào)易報(bào);2009年

2 本報(bào)記者 陶海青;[N];中國(guó)貿(mào)易報(bào);2013年

3 本報(bào)記者 劉彬;[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 本報(bào)記者 湯潯芳;[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2013年

5 實(shí)習(xí)記者 肖瓊;[N];消費(fèi)日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 胡靜;中國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)游戲軟件盜版問(wèn)題研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2011年

2 秦瑜;我國(guó)當(dāng)前軟件盜版問(wèn)題研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

3 柯鑫鑫;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的著作權(quán)保護(hù)模式探討[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

4 郭廓;軟件盜版實(shí)證分析與反盜版政策研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2138753