本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權訴訟 + 專家證人��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：專家證人制度雖然是民事訴訟法中的內容，但是作為與民法一脈相通的知識產(chǎn)權法中也經(jīng)常對其有所涉及，在科學技術不斷發(fā)展的今天，知識產(chǎn)權案件經(jīng)常涉及一些專業(yè)領域的技術問題，在此背景之下,為解決訴訟中的技術問題而產(chǎn)生的專家證人制度開始受到我國知識產(chǎn)權理論界與實務界的關注。我國現(xiàn)在在民事訴訟法以及知識產(chǎn)權訴訟中都還沒有有關專家證人制度的立法，但是在我國知識產(chǎn)權訴訟司法實踐中已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了對專家證人制度的適用，例如一些法院已經(jīng)在知識產(chǎn)權訴訟中使用專家證人以及出臺了一些改革措施來推行專家證人制度，雖然目前看來這些措施在知識產(chǎn)權訴訟中收到了不錯的效果，給知識產(chǎn)權案件帶來了一些利益，但長此下去，，必然會因為該制度缺乏規(guī)定性及操作性而產(chǎn)生一系列的問題，我的論文就是針對這種情況，提出將專家證人制度引入我國知識產(chǎn)權訴訟的設想，但我同時也看到，專家證人制度是英美法系的產(chǎn)物，因此在引進該制度的過程中我們應當對其有所保留，并且我國的鑒定人制度也存在專家證人制度不可替代的優(yōu)點，于是我設想將專家證人制度與鑒定人制度結合起來，形成專家——鑒定人模式，并在文章中提出了對我國知識產(chǎn)權訴訟中專家證人制度的立法構建的設想。
[Abstract]:Although the expert witness system is the content of the civil procedure law, it is often involved in the intellectual property law, which is connected with the civil law. Today, with the development of science and technology, Intellectual property rights cases often involve some technical problems in professional fields. Under this background, the expert witness system in order to solve the technical problems in litigation has attracted the attention of intellectual property theorists and practitioners in our country. There is no legislation on the expert witness system in the civil procedure law and intellectual property litigation in our country, but in the judicial practice of intellectual property litigation in our country, the expert witness system has been applied. For example, some courts have used expert witnesses in intellectual property litigation and introduced some reform measures to implement the expert witness system, although it appears that these measures have achieved good results in intellectual property litigation. It has brought some benefits to intellectual property cases, but in the long run, it will inevitably cause a series of problems due to the lack of regulation and operation of the system. My paper aims at this kind of situation. This paper puts forward the idea of introducing the expert witness system into our intellectual property litigation, but at the same time, I also see that the expert witness system is the product of the common law system, so we should have some reservations about it in the process of introducing this system. And the expert witness system in our country also has the irreplaceable advantages of the expert witness system, so I imagine combining the expert witness system with the expert witness system to form the expert-expert model. In this paper, the author puts forward some ideas on the legislative construction of expert witness system in intellectual property litigation in China.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.13

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王靜;;淺析我國的知識產(chǎn)權訴訟專家證人制度[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2006年06期

2 齊樹潔;洪秀娟;;英國專家證人制度改革的啟示與借鑒[J];中國司法;2006年05期

3 汪建成;;專家證人模式與司法鑒定模式之比較[J];證據(jù)科學;2010年01期

4 邵劭;;論專家證人制度的構建——以專家證人制度與鑒定制度的交叉共存為視角[J];法商研究;2011年04期

5 胡震遠;;我國專家證人制度的建構[J];法學;2007年08期

6 郭華;;鑒定人與專家證人制度的沖突及其解決——評最高院有關專家證人的相關答復[J];法學;2010年05期

7 盧永紅;論專家證人——美國專家證人制度的啟迪與中國司法現(xiàn)實的思考[J];中央政法管理干部學院學報;2000年06期

8 古強;李欣遙;;知識產(chǎn)權訴訟中專家地位研究[J];華章;2010年23期

9 易健雄;;知識產(chǎn)權訴訟中的專家證人制度[J];人民司法;2009年11期

10 徐靜村;顏飛;;通過程序彌合知識的鴻溝——論科學證據(jù)對刑事審判的挑戰(zhàn)及應對[J];中國司法鑒定;2009年02期

本文編號：2085588