本文選題：專利權(quán)濫用 + 市場(chǎng)壟斷�。� 參考：《天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在世界經(jīng)濟(jì)日益發(fā)展的背景下,國(guó)際市場(chǎng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)也逐漸激烈。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)尤其是專利權(quán)在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中起到了不可忽視的作用。許多國(guó)內(nèi)外的大型公司為了能在激烈的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中占有一席之地,則把競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的手段放在了專利權(quán)的濫用上面,導(dǎo)致專利權(quán)在實(shí)際運(yùn)用中引發(fā)了一系列的不符合法律規(guī)定的問(wèn)題。為了維護(hù)正常的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序,保障市場(chǎng)主體能夠自由、公平的進(jìn)行交易,就必須運(yùn)用《反壟斷法》對(duì)專利權(quán)濫用的行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。專利權(quán)的不正當(dāng)行使所導(dǎo)致的壟斷問(wèn)題也是《反壟斷法》所要規(guī)范的內(nèi)容,因此,《反壟斷法》在控制專利權(quán)的濫用行為上與其他相關(guān)法律比較起來(lái)具有明顯的優(yōu)勢(shì),處理問(wèn)題時(shí)更具有權(quán)威性,力度也更強(qiáng)大。從其他國(guó)家的一些實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)中我們也可以看到運(yùn)用《反壟斷法》控制濫用專利權(quán)的行為已經(jīng)取得了良好的效果。因此,從《反壟斷法》的角度來(lái)控制專利權(quán)的濫用而導(dǎo)致的市場(chǎng)壟斷現(xiàn)象,建立起相應(yīng)的反壟斷法律法規(guī)是十分必要的。 基于上述的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況,本論文以如何運(yùn)用《反壟斷法》控制專利權(quán)濫用為研究主題,從專利權(quán)濫用這一基礎(chǔ)概念出發(fā),以現(xiàn)存的《反壟斷法》為主要的法律依據(jù)和相關(guān)的研究重點(diǎn),同時(shí)采取了實(shí)證研究法、比較分析法等研究方法,系統(tǒng)的介紹了專利權(quán)濫用的表現(xiàn)情況以及其濫用的危害,引出《反壟斷法》規(guī)制專利權(quán)濫用的必要性的同時(shí),分析了目前我國(guó)《反壟斷法》規(guī)制專利權(quán)濫用所存在的一些主要問(wèn)題。通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)、日本以及歐盟等國(guó)家在反壟斷法規(guī)制專利權(quán)的具體做法的比較及經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒,結(jié)合我國(guó)的具體實(shí)際情況,提出了如何改善專利權(quán)濫用規(guī)制方法、提早預(yù)防濫用現(xiàn)象發(fā)生、及具體執(zhí)法應(yīng)用的實(shí)用性和可操作性的對(duì)策建議。通過(guò)本文的研究,形成了專利權(quán)不僅要保護(hù),并且當(dāng)專利權(quán)濫用造成壟斷時(shí),要合理運(yùn)用《反壟斷法》控制專利權(quán)濫用的基本論點(diǎn)。以期使反壟斷法律規(guī)制的更加合理科學(xué),專利權(quán)使用的規(guī)范而有序,促進(jìn)我國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)步發(fā)展,維護(hù)市場(chǎng)的正常運(yùn)行秩序。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the development of the world economy, the competition in the international market is becoming more and more fierce. Intellectual property, especially patent rights, plays an important role in economic development. In order to have a place in the fierce market competition, many large companies at home and abroad put the means of competition on the abuse of patent right, which led to a series of problems not in accordance with the law. In order to maintain the normal order of market competition and ensure that the main body of the market can trade freely and fairly, we must use the Anti-monopoly Law to regulate the abuse of patent right. The monopoly problem caused by improper exercise of patent right is also the content of the anti-monopoly law. Therefore, the anti-monopoly law has obvious advantages in controlling the abuse of patent right compared with other relevant laws. It is more authoritative and powerful in dealing with problems. From some practical experiences in other countries, we can also see that the use of Anti-monopoly Law to control the abuse of patent rights has achieved good results. Therefore, it is necessary to control the market monopoly caused by the abuse of patent right from the angle of "Anti-monopoly Law", and establish the corresponding anti-monopoly laws and regulations. Based on the above facts, this paper focuses on how to use the Anti-monopoly Law to control patent abuse, starting from the basic concept of patent abuse. Taking the existing Anti-monopoly Law as the main legal basis and relevant research focus, and taking the empirical research method, comparative analysis method and other research methods, this paper systematically introduces the manifestation of patent abuse and its harm. This paper introduces the necessity of regulating patent abuse in the Anti-monopoly Law, and analyzes some main problems existing in the regulation of patent abuse in China. Based on the comparison of the specific practices and experiences of the United States, Japan and the European Union in regulating patent rights in the anti-monopoly law, and in the light of the actual situation in China, this paper puts forward how to improve the regulation methods of patent abuse. Early prevention of abuse, and practical and operational countermeasures for specific law enforcement applications. Through the research of this paper, the basic argument that patent right should not only be protected, but also be controlled by anti-monopoly law should be used reasonably when patent abuse results in monopoly. In order to make the legal regulation of anti-monopoly more reasonable and scientific, the use of patent rights standard and orderly, to promote the steady development of intellectual property rights economy in China, to maintain the normal operation of the market order.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王先林,吳建農(nóng);壟斷的一般界定與反壟斷法所規(guī)制的壟斷[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

2 王先林;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行使行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制——《反壟斷法》第55條的理解與適用[J];法學(xué)家;2008年01期

3 寧金星;;論我國(guó)反壟斷法對(duì)專利權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年01期

4 趙宇可;朱淑娣;;美國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的反壟斷限制及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2008年09期

5 朱淑娣;;中美知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷限制規(guī)范比較研究——兼議國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)博弈中的合法利益爭(zhēng)取[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2009年10期

6 王曉曄;;濫用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的法律問(wèn)題——《反壟斷法》釋義之四[J];中國(guó)商界(上半月);2008年02期

7 王先林;;中國(guó)反壟斷法應(yīng)如何對(duì)待知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題[J];科技與法律;2007年03期

8 張玲;王洋;;專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];南開(kāi)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

9 吳廣海;;專利權(quán)和反壟斷法的關(guān)系及啟示[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

10 吳玉嶺;張長(zhǎng)琦;;專利濫用的反壟斷規(guī)制——美國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)與中國(guó)借鑒[J];南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 馬云鶴;反壟斷法資產(chǎn)剝離制度研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2011年

2 吳云峰;跨國(guó)并購(gòu)反壟斷法規(guī)制問(wèn)題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2027720