本文選題：網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪 + 刑事立法��； 參考：《安徽財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國已經(jīng)成為知識產(chǎn)權發(fā)展最快的國家,相信不久我國將迎來知識產(chǎn)權時代。而網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權則是即將到來的知識產(chǎn)權時代里最重要的組成部分。網(wǎng)絡數(shù)據(jù)信息的爆炸式增長,為創(chuàng)新提供了素材,同時網(wǎng)絡本身也為創(chuàng)造提供了技術支持。但隨之而來的是網(wǎng)絡大量侵權行為的存在和相應法律法規(guī)的模糊規(guī)定�，F(xiàn)行的知識產(chǎn)權制度中關于知識產(chǎn)權犯罪客觀方面的規(guī)定已經(jīng)有很多不適用于網(wǎng)絡的情況。網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪是一種依靠網(wǎng)絡技術進行的犯罪,而且犯罪對象也存在于網(wǎng)絡里,因此它與傳統(tǒng)的知識產(chǎn)權犯罪有很多不同。這就會使現(xiàn)行的知識產(chǎn)權刑事法律規(guī)范在打擊網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪時有諸多不適宜的地方,不利于網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權的良好發(fā)展。而且隨著網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權和網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的發(fā)展,現(xiàn)行的知識產(chǎn)權犯罪刑事立法規(guī)范也會越來越不足,這就需要不斷進行理論和實踐的研究,找出彌補這些不足之處的方式。本文先引入網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的含義,結合著它與傳統(tǒng)知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的不同,重點分析網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪對現(xiàn)行刑事立法提出的新的要求。最后提出完善的對策。網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪對現(xiàn)行刑事法律總體最大的挑戰(zhàn)主要集中在刑事實體法的犯罪構成規(guī)定上,刑事程序法中關于起訴主體的安排、法院關于網(wǎng)路知識產(chǎn)權犯罪管轄權的協(xié)調、對證據(jù)的要求更高以及法院審判職能的專業(yè)化上。因此本文的主體內容主要就是圍繞這些問題展開論述的。在行文結構上,按照上述思路的安排,本文的內容分為四個部分。第一部分主要闡述網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的概念及其表現(xiàn)形式,以用來明確界定什么是網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪,它與普通知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的主要區(qū)別;第二部分分別從網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪對傳統(tǒng)知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的實體法和程序法兩個方面的挑戰(zhàn),為后續(xù)立法建議找到突破口;第三部分分析我國知識產(chǎn)權犯罪立法現(xiàn)狀,找出我國網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪刑事立法存在的不足,從而為提出具體的建議找到立足點;第四部分主要結合以上三個部分的內容就完善網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的立法提出具體的建議。
[Abstract]:China has become the country with the fastest development of intellectual property, I believe that our country will usher in the era of intellectual property soon. Network intellectual property is the most important part of the coming intellectual property era. The explosive growth of network data provides material for innovation, and the network itself provides technical support for creation. However, the following is the existence of a large number of network torts and the fuzzy provisions of the corresponding laws and regulations. In the current intellectual property system, there are many provisions on the objective aspects of intellectual property crimes that are not applicable to the network. Network intellectual property crime is a crime that depends on the network technology, and the object of crime also exists in the network, so it is different from the traditional intellectual property crime. This will make the current intellectual property criminal law norms in the fight against network intellectual property crimes there are a lot of inappropriate places, is not conducive to the good development of network intellectual property rights. And with the development of network intellectual property and network intellectual property crime, the current criminal legislation of intellectual property crime will be more and more inadequate, which requires continuous theoretical and practical research to find out the ways to remedy these deficiencies. This paper first introduces the meaning of network intellectual property crime, combined with the difference between it and traditional intellectual property crime, and analyzes the new requirements of network intellectual property crime on the current criminal legislation. Finally, put forward the perfect countermeasure. The greatest challenge to the current criminal law is mainly focused on the criminal constitution of the criminal substantive law, the arrangement of the prosecution subject in the criminal procedure law and the coordination of the jurisdiction of the court on the crime of network intellectual property. The higher demand for evidence and the professionalization of the court's judicial function. Therefore, the main content of this paper is mainly around these issues. In the structure of the text, according to the above thinking arrangement, the content of this paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly expounds the concept of network intellectual property crime and its manifestation, in order to clearly define what network intellectual property crime is, and the main difference between network intellectual property crime and ordinary intellectual property crime. The second part from the network intellectual property rights crime to the traditional intellectual property rights crime substantive law and the procedure law two aspects challenge, for the follow-up legislation suggestion to find the breakthrough; the third part analysis our country intellectual property right crime legislation present situation, To find out the shortcomings of criminal legislation of network intellectual property crime in our country, so as to find a foothold for putting forward concrete suggestions; the fourth part mainly combines the contents of the above three parts to put forward specific suggestions to improve the legislation of network intellectual property crime.
【學位授予單位】：安徽財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.33

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 沈木珠;;網(wǎng)絡侵權罪與非罪的把握和思考[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2006年05期

2 盧臻;;網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權刑法保護現(xiàn)行立法模式的弊端及改革[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2009年24期

3 于濤;;試論網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權的刑法保護[J];科技信息;2009年19期

4 陳斌;鄧立軍;;網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權犯罪的刑事立法完善[J];人民檢察;2011年16期

5 龔紅衛(wèi);;網(wǎng)絡知識產(chǎn)權的刑事法保護——以其對傳統(tǒng)知識產(chǎn)權的特征變異為視角[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟;2011年12期

，

本文編號：1958335