本文選題：專利法 + 專利侵權(quán)�。� 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：訴前禁令措施的建立是以我國加入世界貿(mào)易組織，滿足《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》的要求為時代背景的，為履行成員國應(yīng)盡的條約義務(wù)，我國修改了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)法律，設(shè)立了訴前禁令措施。這一制度的設(shè)立、實(shí)施是我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度史上的一個重要里程碑。由于該措施在我國處于起步階段，在司法實(shí)踐中存在不足，，這需要我們不斷地學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒國外先進(jìn)的法律理念和優(yōu)秀的立法經(jīng)驗，來完善我國的現(xiàn)有立法,使我國的法律制度能夠更好的與世界接軌。 本文研究的目是深入分析我國專利侵權(quán)訴訟中的訴前禁令措施存在的問題，提出一些建議，以便在司法實(shí)踐中正確運(yùn)用訴前禁令，鼓勵發(fā)明創(chuàng)造，保護(hù)和促進(jìn)我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的發(fā)展。文章首先從訴前禁令的基本內(nèi)容入手，闡述了訴前禁令的涵義、起源、分類、特點(diǎn)及在我國的產(chǎn)生，為之后的論述鋪墊了必要的理論基礎(chǔ)。然后分析了兩大法系國家的訴前禁令措施，以便我國司法機(jī)關(guān)充分借鑒國外成功的立法和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗。并找出我國訴前禁令措施存在的問題，再比照訴前禁令措施比較完善的美國，結(jié)合國內(nèi)的實(shí)踐，從立法理論、實(shí)踐來角度，提出自己的建議。
[Abstract]:The establishment of pre-lawsuit prohibition measures is based on China's accession to the World Trade Organization and meeting the requirements of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (trips Agreement). In order to fulfill the treaty obligations due to member States, China has amended the relevant laws on intellectual property rights. Pre-suit injunctions have been established. The establishment of this system is an important milestone in the history of intellectual property protection system in China. Because this measure is in its infancy in our country, it is necessary for us to learn and learn from foreign advanced legal concepts and excellent legislative experience to perfect the existing legislation in our country. So that our legal system can better with the world. The purpose of this paper is to deeply analyze the problems existing in the measures of pre-suit injunction in patent infringement litigation in China, and put forward some suggestions in order to use the injunction correctly in judicial practice and encourage invention and creation. To protect and promote the development of intellectual property rights in China. The article begins with the basic content of the injunction before lawsuit, and expounds the meaning, origin, classification, characteristics and emergence of the injunction in China, which lays the necessary theoretical foundation for the later discussion. Then it analyzes the pre-lawsuit injunctions in the countries of two legal systems, so that the judicial organs of our country can draw lessons from the successful legislation and practice experience of foreign countries. And find out the existing problems of the pre-lawsuit injunction measures in our country, and then compare the pre-lawsuit injunction measures more perfect in the United States, combined with the domestic practice, from the legislative theory, practical point of view, put forward their own suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓天嵐;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中訴前禁令的適用[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年04期

2 和育東;;試析專利侵權(quán)訴前禁令制度存在的問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

3 馮潔涵;全球公共健康危機(jī)、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護(hù)與WTO多哈宣言[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年02期

4 馬瑞春;;論完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)禁令制度[J];法制與社會;2008年15期

5 須建楚;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判中禁令的適用[J];科技與法律;2003年04期

6 段立紅;訴前臨時措施的審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)──中外專利侵權(quán)訴訟臨時措施制度比較[J];人民司法;2001年09期

7 陳家宏,李永泉;禁止令制度初探[J];西南交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

8 謝曉玲;;法院審理專利侵權(quán)訴前禁令案件問題探析[J];山東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

9 馮曉青;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的價值構(gòu)造:知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法利益平衡機(jī)制研究[J];中國法學(xué);2007年01期

10 李德山;臨時禁令在美國專利侵權(quán)訴訟中的適用[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);1999年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 蔣志培;[N];人民法院報;2001年

本文編號：1911819