本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 融資擔保　； 參考：《華中師范大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保是債務(wù)人為籌集資金,在其或第三人提供的可以轉(zhuǎn)讓的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)上依法設(shè)定質(zhì)權(quán),將該財產(chǎn)權(quán)作為債的擔保,債權(quán)人可以在債務(wù)人不履行債務(wù)時,處分擔保并優(yōu)先于其他債權(quán)人受償?shù)膿Ｎ餀?quán)制度。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保制度的建立,是為了更好的利用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)這種無形資產(chǎn),促進知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略的發(fā)展。在現(xiàn)代科技不斷發(fā)展的過程中,科學技術(shù)的創(chuàng)新成為企業(yè)發(fā)展的重要動力,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制,能夠有效的解決擁有自主知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的中小企業(yè)在發(fā)展過程中融資難的問題。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保作為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資的一種重要方式,已經(jīng)得到國際的普遍承認,并且在世界范圍內(nèi)逐步推廣,一些發(fā)達國家已經(jīng)構(gòu)建了完善的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制。我國在《擔保法》以及《物權(quán)法》中,都明確指出了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)可以作為權(quán)利質(zhì)押的一種。近幾年,我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展迅速,并先后成立了16個知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保試點地區(qū),但因為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為無形資產(chǎn)的特殊性,相比較一般的有形資產(chǎn)的擔保,具有其特殊的風險性,而處于起步階段的我國,相關(guān)立法還不完善,配套的制度需要構(gòu)建,在推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保發(fā)展時,許多問題需要解決。本文在比較分析了國外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制的特點,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)行機制的問題,提出完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制的建議。本文一共分為四個部分： 第一部分主要是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保的一般分析,闡述了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保的概念,分析可以進行質(zhì)押融資的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的范圍、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保的三種方式以及知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保的風險。 第二部分主要對我國現(xiàn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保的四種典型模式進行歸納和對比分析,總結(jié)我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制的問題。 第三部分是介紹并且比較分析美國和日本兩個國家的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制的特點,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗以及給我國的啟示。 第四部分是根據(jù)國外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制的特點和經(jīng)驗,針對我國的問題,提出完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資擔保機制的建議。
[Abstract]:In order to raise funds, the debtor creates a pledge on the transferable intellectual property provided by the debtor or a third party according to law, using the property right as the security of the debt. The creditor may, when the debtor fails to perform the obligation, Disposition of security and priority over other creditors in the system of security interests. The establishment of intellectual property financing guarantee system is to make better use of intellectual property as an intangible asset and to promote the development of intellectual property strategy. In the process of continuous development of modern science and technology, innovation of science and technology has become an important driving force for the development of enterprises. Intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism can effectively solve the problem of financing difficulties in the development process of small and medium-sized enterprises with independent intellectual property rights. As an important way of intellectual property financing, intellectual property financing guarantee has been widely recognized by the world, and gradually spread in the world, some developed countries have established a perfect guarantee mechanism for intellectual property financing. In the Law of Guaranty and the Law of Real right, our country has clearly pointed out that intellectual property can be used as a pledge of rights. In recent years, China's intellectual property financing guarantee business has developed rapidly, and has established 16 pilot areas of intellectual property financing guarantee. However, because of the particularity of intellectual property rights as intangible assets, the guarantee of tangible assets is more common. It has its special risk, but in the initial stage of our country, the relevant legislation is not perfect, the supporting system needs to be constructed, in promoting the development of intellectual property financing guarantee, many problems need to be solved. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the characteristics of foreign intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism in China. This paper is divided into four parts: The first part is mainly about the general analysis of intellectual property financing guarantee, expounds the concept of intellectual property financing security, analyzes the scope of intellectual property rights that can be pledged. The three ways of intellectual property financing guarantee and the risk of intellectual property financing guarantee. In the second part, four typical models of intellectual property financing guarantee in China are summarized and compared, and the problems of intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism are summarized. The third part is to introduce and compare the characteristics of the intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism between the United States and Japan, sum up the experience and enlighten our country. The fourth part is based on the characteristics and experience of foreign intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism, aiming at the problems of our country, put forward some suggestions to perfect our intellectual property financing guarantee mechanism.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4;D923.2

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前10條

1 方興順;TRIPS協(xié)定下地理標志保護的法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2010年

2 殷志軍;中小企業(yè)信用擔保機構(gòu)運行機制和效率研究[D];浙江大學;2011年

3 劉輝;科研誠信問題研究[D];吉林大學;2011年

4 姚王信;企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)融資研究：理論、模型與應(yīng)用[D];天津財經(jīng)大學;2011年

5 游棟明;基于金融功能觀視角的農(nóng)業(yè)政策性銀行體制創(chuàng)新研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學;2010年

6 蔣虹;論商號及其法律保護[D];華東政法大學;2011年

7 李峰;應(yīng)收賬款擔保法律制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學;2011年

8 吳志宇;住房置業(yè)擔保法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學;2009年

9 劉勇;農(nóng)業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護及制度創(chuàng)新[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2011年

10 郭濟環(huán);標準與專利的融合、沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[D];中國政法大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1907638