發(fā)布時間：2018-04-21 22:23

  本文選題：著作權質(zhì)押 + 質(zhì)押標的　； 參考：《遼寧大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：智力成果自受到法律保護以來,特別是在第二次世界大戰(zhàn)之后,知識產(chǎn)權等無形財產(chǎn)的重要性已日益凸顯,其財產(chǎn)價值連年攀升。隨著全球金融危機的爆發(fā),土地、住房和其它有形擔保物的王者地位發(fā)生改變,金融機構正在探索新的信貸方式,企業(yè)也亟待尋求別樣融資渠道,因而富含經(jīng)濟價值的知識產(chǎn)權便成為這種探求的對接點。如何最大限度地利用知識產(chǎn)權的價值,實現(xiàn)從靜態(tài)管理到動態(tài)利用的質(zhì)的飛躍,成為一個國家提升創(chuàng)新能力和核心競爭力的重要因素。實踐表明,知識產(chǎn)權擔保已成為經(jīng)濟活動的必然選擇。作為知識產(chǎn)權領域三大支柱之一的著作權,與專利權和商標權相比,具備更多的文化價值,為推動文化的發(fā)展和繁榮提供不竭的動力。同時,著作權還是文化價值利益化的體現(xiàn),兼具財產(chǎn)屬性中的可使用性和可交換性。而著作權質(zhì)押則是彰顯其經(jīng)濟屬性的最有力的方式之一,是著作權價值性利用的典型代表。它不僅是著作權人對著作權加以利用的重要方式,也是其進行擔保融資的有效手段。近年來,由于著作權質(zhì)押融資活動逐年增多,相應的理論探討也隨之增加。然而,基于著作權區(qū)別于有體物擔保的特性,加之理論研究不足、制度規(guī)范闕如等原因,著作權質(zhì)押依然舉步維艱。其中著作權質(zhì)押中的法律問題集中體現(xiàn)在質(zhì)押標的范圍、登記效力、權利沖突以及質(zhì)權人權利保護方面。本文以擔保物權基本理論為基礎,由權利質(zhì)權的性質(zhì)和具體適用規(guī)則延伸到著作權質(zhì)押規(guī)則,結合著作權本身的特性和特有價值并借鑒國外立法經(jīng)驗,針對著作權質(zhì)押中存在的問題,提出個人的見解以及完善建議。包括目前立法中并未提及,但是在近年來,知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押融資實踐中大量產(chǎn)生的未來作品版權是否能成為質(zhì)押標的的問題,建議將未來作品著作權納入質(zhì)押標的范圍,并且設立預告質(zhì)押制度以及運用著作權打包組合質(zhì)押的形式保障質(zhì)權人實現(xiàn)質(zhì)權;分析著作人身權與財產(chǎn)權相沖突的現(xiàn)狀,提出采用許可使用和默示推定并舉的方式限制著作人身權;主張著作權質(zhì)押登記的效力應該采取登記對抗主義,提高交易效率;在著作權質(zhì)押雙方權利義務方面,提出廢除質(zhì)權人同意權,并賦予出質(zhì)人以重復質(zhì)押權以平衡雙方的利益關系,最大限度的促進著作權經(jīng)濟價值的實現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Since intellectual achievements have been protected by law, especially after the second World War, the importance of intellectual property and other intangible property has become increasingly prominent, and the value of intellectual property has been rising year after year. With the outbreak of the global financial crisis, land, housing and other tangible collateral status has changed, financial institutions are exploring new forms of credit, and enterprises are looking for alternative financing channels. Thus the intellectual property, which is rich in economic value, becomes the docking point of this exploration. How to maximize the value of intellectual property and realize the qualitative leap from static management to dynamic utilization has become an important factor for a country to enhance its innovation ability and core competitiveness. Practice shows that intellectual property guarantee has become the inevitable choice of economic activities. As one of the three pillars in the field of intellectual property, copyright has more cultural value than patent rights and trademark rights, and provides an inexhaustible power for promoting the development and prosperity of culture. At the same time, copyright is the embodiment of the benefit of cultural value. The pledge of copyright is one of the most powerful ways to show its economic attribute, and it is a typical representative of the use of copyright value. It is not only an important way for copyright owners to make use of copyright, but also an effective means to guarantee financing. In recent years, as the financing of copyright pledge increases year by year, the corresponding theoretical discussion also increases. However, due to the difference between copyright and physical security, the lack of theoretical research and the lack of institutional norms, the pledge of copyright is still difficult. The legal problems in copyright pledge are embodied in the scope of pledge object, registration effectiveness, conflict of rights and the protection of the rights of the mortgagee. Based on the basic theory of security right, this paper extends from the nature and specific applicable rules of pledge of rights to the rules of copyright pledge, combines the characteristics and unique value of copyright and draws lessons from foreign legislative experience. In view of the existing problems in copyright pledge, this paper puts forward personal opinions and suggestions for perfection. Including not mentioned in the current legislation, but in recent years, whether the copyright of future works produced in large quantities in the practice of intellectual property pledge financing can be the subject of pledge, it is suggested that the copyright of future works be included in the scope of pledge subject. And set up the system of prenotice pledge and use the form of the copyright package combination pledge to protect the mortgagee to realize the pledge, and analyze the current situation of the conflict between the personal right and the property right of the author, It is proposed to restrict the personal rights of the author by means of both licensing and implied presumption; to advocate that the registration of copyright pledge should be effective against registration and to improve the efficiency of transactions; and that, in terms of the rights and obligations of both parties to copyright pledge, This paper proposes to abolish the right of consent of the licensor and to endow the mortgagee with the right of repeated pledge in order to balance the interests of both parties and to promote the realization of the economic value of copyright to the maximum extent.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊延超;;為知識產(chǎn)權擔保正名——質(zhì)押還是抵押[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2008年04期

2 羅歡平;;質(zhì)權還是抵押權:再論普通債權質(zhì)權的性質(zhì)[J];法學評論;2009年03期

3 李明發(fā);田地;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)版權質(zhì)押融資法律問題研究[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年02期

4 王艷麗;吳一鳴;;知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押融資法律制度研究[J];湖北社會科學;2013年10期

5 周思妍;李秋燕;;域外知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押融資法律制度比較分析[J];傳播與版權;2014年02期

6 李莉;;論知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)權人權利保護規(guī)則的局限與突破[J];東方法學;2014年02期

7 馮曉青;;我國企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)押融資及其完善對策研究[J];河北法學;2012年12期

8 李鵑;;知識產(chǎn)權擔保權實現(xiàn)的障礙及其克服[J];河北法學;2014年07期

9 謝黎偉;;著作權質(zhì)押的困境和出路[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2010年06期

10 任中秀;;解釋論視野下知識產(chǎn)權質(zhì)權人權利探析[J];知識產(chǎn)權;2012年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 姜鵬;著作權質(zhì)押法律效力研究[D];湖南師范大學;2011年

2 魯幽;著作權質(zhì)押法律問題探究[D];西南大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1784337