本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) + 行為保全��； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域中,行為保全制度作為一種臨時(shí)性救濟(jì)程序起到了至關(guān)重要的作用。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全作為民事行為保全制度的重要組成部分是由2001年引入中國(guó)并正式在法律條文中確立的,當(dāng)時(shí)傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法三大領(lǐng)域,即《專利法》、《商標(biāo)法》和《著作權(quán)法》都進(jìn)行了修訂并增加“訴前臨時(shí)措施”的規(guī)定,從而正式形成了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全制度并確立其重要地位。在以后的司法實(shí)踐中,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全制度不斷得到豐富和發(fā)展,其中2012年頒布的新《民事訴訟法》和2015年發(fā)布的《關(guān)于審查知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)糾紛行為保全案件適用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋(征求意見(jiàn)稿)》對(duì)該制度各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)和全面的規(guī)定,在很大程度上為行為保全制度在司法實(shí)踐中的正確運(yùn)用奠定了基礎(chǔ)和提供了指導(dǎo)。但我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案件復(fù)雜,而行為保全制度起步較晚,相關(guān)規(guī)定不夠明確和統(tǒng)一,尚有諸多問(wèn)題需要完善。為促進(jìn)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全制度的完善,本文首先從概念特征、特殊性、構(gòu)成要件與法律適用等方面對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全制度進(jìn)行了概述,其次通過(guò)對(duì)比考察英美、大陸等域外法系中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全制度,總結(jié)了國(guó)外先進(jìn)的司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),為我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全的完善提供了借鑒和啟示,再次根據(jù)我國(guó)立法和執(zhí)行現(xiàn)狀分析了審查要件、擔(dān)保、執(zhí)行和救濟(jì)程序等方面存在的問(wèn)題,最后針對(duì)上述問(wèn)題分別提出相應(yīng)的完善建議,本文的討論旨在健全我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行為保全制度并促進(jìn)其在司法實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)用。
[Abstract]:In the field of intellectual property rights, the act preservation system plays a vital role as a temporary relief procedure.As an important part of the civil act preservation system, the preservation of intellectual property acts was introduced into China in 2001 and formally established in the legal provisions. At that time, there were three major areas of traditional intellectual property law.In other words, the Patent Law, the Trademark Law and the copyright Law have been amended and the provisions of "interim measures before lawsuit" have been added, thus formally forming the intellectual property protection system and establishing its important position.In the later judicial practice, the preservation system of intellectual property acts has been enriched and developed continuously.Of these, the new Code of Civil procedure promulgated in 2012 and the explanation (draft for comments) issued in 2015 on certain issues applicable to the review of the applicable law in cases of intellectual property rights and preservation of competition disputes have carried out various aspects of the system.Systematic and comprehensive provisions,To a great extent, it lays a foundation and provides guidance for the correct application of the act preservation system in judicial practice.However, the intellectual property dispute cases in China are complex, and the behavior preservation system starts late, the relevant regulations are not clear and unified, and there are still many problems to be improved.In order to promote the perfection of the preservation system of intellectual property act in our country, this paper firstly summarizes the preservation system of intellectual property act in our country from the aspects of concept characteristics, particularity, constitutive elements and application of law, and then makes a comparative study on the preservation system of intellectual property act in Britain and the United States.The preservation system of intellectual property acts in the mainland and other extraterritorial legal systems summarizes the advanced judicial experience of foreign countries and provides reference and inspiration for the perfection of the preservation of intellectual property acts in our country, and then analyzes the examination elements according to the current situation of legislation and implementation of our country.In the end, the author puts forward corresponding suggestions for the above problems. The purpose of this paper is to perfect the preservation system of intellectual property act in our country and to promote its application in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 鄭本香;;民事訴訟行為保全制度的細(xì)節(jié)化探究——以新民事訴訟法實(shí)施為契機(jī)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年05期

2 冀宗儒;徐輝;;論民事訴訟保全制度功能的最大化[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年01期

3 陳小煒;施曉楠;;論行為保全制度的內(nèi)涵界定和價(jià)值考量[J];改革與開放;2010年09期

4 隋秀娟;;比較法視野中的訴訟行為保全制度的研究[J];淮北職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 柴若冰;;完善我國(guó)民事訴訟法行為保全制度探析[J];河北大學(xué)成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 方義;;我國(guó)民事訴訟行為保全制度的建立及其法律價(jià)值[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2009年02期

7 王樂(lè);;“行為保全”的法律性質(zhì)辨析[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

8 張江濤,薛波;美國(guó)中間禁令探討[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

9 李仕春;;民事保全程序基本問(wèn)題研究[J];中外法學(xué);2005年01期

10 潘偉;關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴前行為保全的法律思考[J];法律適用;2004年04期

中國(guó)博士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前1條

1 王福華;民事保全制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1770906