本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) + 客體��； 參考：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的客體,是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的一個(gè)基礎(chǔ)理論問(wèn)題。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律關(guān)系有三個(gè)要素,即主體、客體與內(nèi)容。這三個(gè)要素是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律關(guān)系發(fā)生、變更與消滅的必備要素,缺一不可。而知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體涉及到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律關(guān)系中的一個(gè)重要方面,對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體的闡明與界定,對(duì)于我們準(zhǔn)確而全面的理解與把握知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律關(guān)系以及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度具有重要意義。我國(guó)目前學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體的認(rèn)識(shí)眾說(shuō)紛紜：傳統(tǒng)民法理論的“智力成果說(shuō)”,以吳漢東、閔鋒、張和生等為代表的“知識(shí)產(chǎn)品說(shuō)”,以鄭成思、張玉敏、張勤等為代表的“信息說(shuō)”,以劉春田為代表的“行為說(shuō)”,以及新萌生的“多重構(gòu)造體系說(shuō)”等。每個(gè)學(xué)說(shuō)都有其學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值,但也存在不足。本文旨在通過(guò)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)各個(gè)理論學(xué)說(shuō)的詳盡分析,并通過(guò)實(shí)際案例的說(shuō)明,意在提出新的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體制度的構(gòu)建以及其制度構(gòu)建的必要性。 本文試圖從辯證的角度分析各個(gè)學(xué)說(shuō)的價(jià)值與不足,經(jīng)過(guò)辯證分析,我們認(rèn)為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體具有兩層順位,第一順位的固有客體為知識(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)和人身利益,第二順位的派生客體為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律關(guān)系處于不穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)時(shí)(如當(dāng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)處于市場(chǎng)流通的交易狀態(tài)時(shí)或者當(dāng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)被侵犯時(shí))的停止侵害、賠償損失等給付行為或者消除影響、賠禮道歉的行為。進(jìn)一步闡述將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體制度寫入法律具有重要意義,一方面有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)“經(jīng)濟(jì)利益最大化”,最大限度實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)的財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值,這種經(jīng)濟(jì)利益最大化可以變成一種對(duì)創(chuàng)作的激勵(lì),知識(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)的積累導(dǎo)致社會(huì)財(cái)富的積累,而社會(huì)財(cái)富的積累正是實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)進(jìn)步與發(fā)展的直接原因；另一方面構(gòu)建知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體制度并在法律中予以規(guī)定,有利于從根本上保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)主體的合法權(quán)利,這也是激勵(lì)制度能夠得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的必要條件。 第一部分闡述的是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體概念的界定。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度的關(guān)系是非常緊密的,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體制約著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度的發(fā)展,隨著客體的不斷更新與變化,法律制度也在不斷進(jìn)步與完善,對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體的界定十分必要。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的客體應(yīng)當(dāng)包含經(jīng)過(guò)法律確認(rèn)和保護(hù)的能夠滿足知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)主體的精神利益和物質(zhì)需要的非物質(zhì)財(cái)富。 第二部分闡述的是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體的代表性學(xué)說(shuō)的綜述與評(píng)析,從哲學(xué)角度和歷史學(xué)角度分析了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體學(xué)說(shuō)在學(xué)界未能統(tǒng)一的原因。詳細(xì)論述與剖析了傳統(tǒng)民法理論的“智力成果說(shuō)”,以吳漢東、閔鋒、張和生等為代表的“知識(shí)產(chǎn)品說(shuō)”,以鄭成思、張玉敏、張勤等為代表的“信息說(shuō)”,以劉春田為代表的“行為說(shuō)”,以及新萌生的“多重構(gòu)造體系說(shuō)”。 第三部分闡述的是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體的基礎(chǔ)理論與結(jié)構(gòu)體系。本文將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的客體分為固有客體與派生客體兩個(gè)順位,第一順位的客體為固有客體,包括知識(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)和人身利益,固有客體為靜態(tài)層面的客體；第二順位的客體為派生客體,是停止侵害、給付、消除影響、賠禮道歉的行為,派生客體為動(dòng)態(tài)層面的客體。 第四部分闡述的是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體更為有效的制度創(chuàng)新,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度的構(gòu)建,一方面要在保護(hù)知識(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)安全性的基礎(chǔ)上兼顧人身利益,另一方面要在保護(hù)固有客體安全性的基礎(chǔ)上保護(hù)派生客體的救濟(jì)可行性。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度的構(gòu)建有利于最大限度實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)的財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值,也有利于從根本上保護(hù)權(quán)利主體的合法權(quán)利。
[Abstract]:The object of intellectual property, is a basic theoretical problem in the field of intellectual property. The intellectual property law has three elements, namely subject, object and content. These three elements are the occurrence of intellectual property law, essential elements, change and eradication are indispensable. And the object of intellectual property involves an important aspect of intellectual property rights in the legal relationship, to clarify and define the object of intellectual property rights, has important meaning for us to accurately understand and grasp the intellectual property law and the legal system of intellectual property rights. The current academic awareness of intellectual property rights object: Public opinions are divergent. traditional civil law theory of "intellectual", by Wu Handong Min Feng. Zhang Hesheng, as the representative of the "knowledge products", by Zheng Chengsi, Zhang Yumin, Zhang Qin as the representative of the "information", with Liu Chuntian as the representative of the "behavior", and The initiation of the new "multiple tectonic system". Each theory has its academic value, but also has some disadvantages. This paper aims at analyzing the theory of intellectual property rights of all, and through the actual case, to construct the necessity of constructing the system and to put forward the new object of intellectual property system.
This article from the perspective of dialectical analysis of various theories of value and shortcomings, through dialectical analysis, we think that the object of intellectual property has two layers of CIS, cis position for the first natural object of intellectual property and personal interests, second bits in a derived object of the intellectual property law of unstable state (such as intellectual property in the market transaction status or when infringing intellectual property rights) when the cessation of the infringement, damages and other payments or eliminate the effects of apology behavior. Further elaboration will play an important role in the system of intellectual property rights in the law, on the one hand, is conducive to the realization of the maximum economic benefits, to maximize the value of intellectual property the property, to maximize the economic benefits can become a creation of the incentive, intellectual property accumulation leads to the accumulation of social wealth, and social wealth accumulation Fatigue is the direct cause of social progress and development. On the other hand, the construction of the object system of intellectual property and the stipulation in law are conducive to fundamentally protect the legitimate rights of the intellectual property owners, which is a necessary condition for the incentive system to be realized.
The first part is the definition of the object of intellectual property. The relationship between the object of intellectual property and intellectual property legal system is very close, the object of intellectual property restricts the development of the legal system of intellectual property rights, with the updating of object and the change of the legal system is also in progress and improvement, it is necessary to define the object of intellectual property rights. The object of intellectual property should be included after the legal recognition and protection of intellectual property rights to meet the spirit of the main interests and material needs of the intangible wealth.
The second part is the summary of representative theories and Analysis on the object of intellectual property, from the angle of philosophy and history analysis theory of the object of intellectual property in academe did not unified. Detailed discussion and analysis of the traditional civil law theory of "intellectual achievements" in Wu Han Dong, min Feng, Zhang Hesheng as the representative of the "knowledge products", by Zheng Chengsi, Zhang Yumin, Zhang Qin as the representative of the "information", with Liu Chuntian as the representative of the "behavior", and the initiation of the "multiple tectonic system".
The third part is the basic theory of structural system and object of intellectual property rights. This will be the object of intellectual property is divided into natural objects and derived object of the two cis position, the first priority of the object as natural object, including intellectual property and personal interests, the inherent object as the object of the static level; the second place for the object the derived object is to stop the infringement, eliminating the effects of payment, the apology behavior derived object as the object dynamic level.
The fourth part is the object of intellectual property is more effective institutional innovation, constructing the legal system of intellectual property rights, on the one hand, to take into account personal interests based on the protection of intellectual property security, on the other hand to protect the object of relief derived feasibility in the foundation for the protection of the security of the natural object. The construction of intellectual property law the system has to achieve the maximum value of intellectual property assets, but also conducive to fundamentally protect the legitimate rights of the subject of right.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 韋之;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體的統(tǒng)一稱謂之我見(jiàn)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年04期

2 鄭成思,朱謝群;信息與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的基本概念[J];科技與法律;2004年02期

3 方新軍;;權(quán)利客體的概念及層次[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年02期

4 鄭成思;朱謝群;;信息與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)(續(xù))[J];西南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

5 李楊;;著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體結(jié)構(gòu)中的使用行為——審視著作權(quán)法權(quán)利作用“焦點(diǎn)”的一個(gè)闡釋進(jìn)路[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2012年03期

6 張旭;論法律關(guān)系客體及其價(jià)值[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年04期

7 張玉敏;易健雄;;主觀與客觀之間——知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)“信息說(shuō)”的重新審視[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年01期

8 粟源;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的哲學(xué)、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和法學(xué)分析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年05期

9 張勤;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體之哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1739457