本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：海關(guān)保護(hù)　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)(又稱(chēng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境保護(hù))是我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)的一種,在依法治國(guó)和國(guó)際接軌的背景下,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)法律制度的建設(shè)有著重要的意義。 目前,西方各發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家都將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)放在極為重要的地位,相應(yīng)的法律法規(guī)日臻完善、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法體制日趨高效,各國(guó)海關(guān)的執(zhí)法力度也在不斷加大,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)同樣已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)海關(guān)一項(xiàng)不可替代的重要非傳統(tǒng)職能。其在抑制侵權(quán)貿(mào)易、維護(hù)公平貿(mào)易秩序、贏取我國(guó)和平發(fā)展外部環(huán)境方面發(fā)揮了重要的作用。 經(jīng)過(guò)這十幾年的迅速發(fā)展,我國(guó)在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)法律制度建設(shè)方面已經(jīng)取得巨大的進(jìn)步,基本的制度框架已然構(gòu)建,但是在如何結(jié)合現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展的需求和執(zhí)法實(shí)踐作進(jìn)一步的完善,仍需理論研究者和實(shí)踐工作者去不斷的探索、思考。作為在海關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)中居于基礎(chǔ)性地位“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)備案保護(hù)”,雖然已經(jīng)在借鑒各國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)后形成了較為完備的備案制度體系,但是隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的不斷向前發(fā)展,在執(zhí)法實(shí)踐中仍存在諸多的問(wèn)題。 如在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)中仍然存在的較為明顯的重實(shí)體輕程序現(xiàn)象,還是可以發(fā)現(xiàn)相關(guān)法條對(duì)備案等的實(shí)體內(nèi)容規(guī)定較為明確,有確定的內(nèi)容及金額,但對(duì)于有關(guān)程序的規(guī)定就較為模糊。法律程序是落實(shí)實(shí)體法律的手段,但是程序規(guī)定相對(duì)薄弱也制約了實(shí)體內(nèi)容的功效,其實(shí)如前所述,我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)包含備案制度在內(nèi)的部分內(nèi)容已經(jīng)較為超前,但是海關(guān)的相關(guān)程序規(guī)定還應(yīng)進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步規(guī)范。 在本文中,筆者正是以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)的備案制度為切入點(diǎn)展開(kāi)細(xì)致的思考與分析,對(duì)備案制度的歷史、現(xiàn)狀以及國(guó)外備案制度進(jìn)行研究,同時(shí)特別關(guān)注執(zhí)法細(xì)節(jié),關(guān)注在備案環(huán)節(jié)上規(guī)定較為模糊的部分,研究如何進(jìn)一步完善梳理流程,制定硬性操作模式,減少自由裁量權(quán),提升效率。以從中概括總結(jié)出對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)備案制度的改進(jìn)意見(jiàn),從而從更高的層面推動(dòng)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)法律制度的建設(shè)。 筆者提出應(yīng)首先應(yīng)綜合平衡兩種備案模式借鑒歐盟海關(guān)“被動(dòng)”申請(qǐng),“主動(dòng)”查處的備案模式和執(zhí)法形式,即采用依申請(qǐng)為主,結(jié)合依職權(quán),并以權(quán)利人為核心的方式。其次提出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)程序無(wú)論以何種方式啟動(dòng),權(quán)利人只應(yīng)提供與貨值等價(jià)的擔(dān)保。再有就是對(duì)專(zhuān)利權(quán)實(shí)施特殊的有限保護(hù)模式。并將此歸納為“主動(dòng)監(jiān)測(cè)、被動(dòng)保護(hù)”的特殊專(zhuān)利權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)模式。積極探討現(xiàn)行備案制度存在的不足和需要改進(jìn)之處。 此外筆者還結(jié)合海關(guān)實(shí)際業(yè)務(wù)工作,提出在備案環(huán)節(jié)引入較為新穎的海關(guān)企業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的備案制度運(yùn)作方式,利用海關(guān)自身優(yōu)勢(shì),蘊(yùn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)工作于海關(guān)的日常企業(yè)管理工作中。最后還提出進(jìn)出口貨物保護(hù)應(yīng)區(qū)別對(duì)待。以此在備案環(huán)節(jié)應(yīng)對(duì)權(quán)利人濫用權(quán)利的情況,使權(quán)利人權(quán)利和義務(wù)更趨一致。
[Abstract]:Customs protection of intellectual property (also known as intellectual property border protection) is one of the administrative protection of intellectual property in China. Under the background of rule by law and international integration, the construction of the legal system of Customs Protection of intellectual property is of great significance.
At present, the developed countries of the western customs protection of intellectual property on a very important position, the corresponding laws and regulations continue to improve the enforcement of intellectual property rights system is more and more efficient, national customs enforcement is also increasing, the Customs Protection of intellectual property rights has also become China's customs an irreplaceable important non-traditional functions. Its inhibition in infringing trade, maintain fair trade order, play an important role to the external environment of China's peaceful development.
After ten years of rapid development, China has made great progress in the construction of legal system of Customs Protection of intellectual property rights, the basic institutional framework is already built, but in how to combine the real development needs and further improve the law enforcement practice, still need theory researchers and practice workers to continually explore, thinking. As the Customs Protection of intellectual property in the basic position of "intellectual property protection of the Customs for the record", has been drawing on the experience of other countries to form a more complete filing system system, but with the continuous economic and social development, there are still many problems in the practice of law enforcement.
If you still exist in the Customs Protection of intellectual property rights in the obvious entity lightprogram phenomenon, can still be found in the relevant law of filing entity content more clearly defined, determine the content and the amount, but for the provisions of the program moreblurred. The legal procedure is a means to implement the substantive laws, but the program the provisions are relatively weak but also restricted the effectiveness of the entity content, in fact, as mentioned earlier, the Customs Protection of intellectual property rights in China contains part of the filing system is more advanced, but the customs related procedures should also be further standardized.
In this paper, the author is thinking and detailed analysis to the filing system of Customs Protection of intellectual property rights as the starting point, to record the history of the system, research status quo and foreign filing system, paying particular attention to the law enforcement details, concerned about the provisions vague in part of the record, to study how to further improve the combing process, develop rigid mode of operation, reduce discretion, enhance efficiency. In order to summarize suggestions for improvement of China Customs Protection of intellectual property rights record system, so as to promote the construction of our country's customs protection of intellectual property rights legal system from a higher level.
The author should first comprehensive balance two record model from the EU customs "passive" application, "active" and the record mode and forms of law enforcement, according to application, combined with the authority, and the right to human centered way. Secondly, the program of Customs Protection of intellectual property rights started regardless of the manner in which human rights only should be equivalent to the value of guarantees. There is the implementation of the patent protection mode Limited special. And this summed up as "active monitoring, passive protection" special patent protection mode of customs. Actively explore the shortcomings of the existing filing system and needs to be improved.
In addition, the author also combined with the actual business of the customs work, introduced the risk management of new enterprises in the customs filing link filing system mode of operation, the customs of their own advantages, the protection of intellectual property rights in the enterprise management in the daily work of the customs. We also put forward the protection of import and export goods should be treated differently. In this part of the record deal with the rights of people the abuse of rights, the rights of people more consistent with the rights and obligations.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉翼;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)中權(quán)利濫用行為的規(guī)制[J];安徽科技;2006年09期

2 房軍;;關(guān)于海關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題的思考[J];遼寧警專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

3 劉菊堂;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)的兩種模式分析[J];青島遠(yuǎn)洋船員學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

4 符騰丹;;我國(guó)海關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度探析[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2008年17期

5 朱國(guó)華;倪天伶;;韓國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展探析[J];中國(guó)高�？萍寂c產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2008年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 董自然;關(guān)于新形勢(shì)下知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)的法律思考[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1713128