本文選題：中國FTAs　切入點：TRIPS　出處：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著貨物貿易、服務貿易在全球范圍內展開合作，知識產權保護的國際合作也成為國際經濟領域的重要合作內容。TRIPS協定中有很多為照顧發(fā)展中國家利益而規(guī)定的彈性條款，而近年來，，發(fā)達國家不滿足TRIPS協定規(guī)定的知識產權保護水平，想通過各種方法提高知識產權保護水平。由于多哈回合談判的停滯不前，發(fā)達國家將自由貿易協定作為其推行“超TRIPS”條款的主要方式，給經濟發(fā)展和知識產權保護水平差異很大的發(fā)展中國家?guī)砗芏鄩毫�。中國是TRIPS協定下最大的發(fā)展中國家，當下簽訂的FTAs中知識產權條款存在很多問題，知識產權自由貿易協定戰(zhàn)略安排體系也比較薄弱，不足以應對當下發(fā)達國家強勢的“超TRIPS”規(guī)則。本文即以TRIPS協定為基礎，對中國FTAs知識產權條款存在的問題以及新出現的“超TRIPS”條款展開研究，為中國日后簽訂FTA知識產權規(guī)則提供借鑒意義。 文章分為以下六個部分： 第一部分是關于中國FTAs知識產權條款的概述。文章采用歷史分析方法、比較分析方法，梳理了中國當下簽訂的7個包含知識產權條款的自由貿易協定的規(guī)定情況，對每個FTA知識產權條款內容做了簡要介紹，并提出本文研究的的命題。 第二部分分析了中國FTAs知識產權總則條款。運用比較分析和綜合分析的方法，將中國FTAs知識產權總則條款與TRIPS協定的總則條款進行對比，發(fā)現其在結構和內容上存在的問題，并加以分析。 第三部分對中國FTAs知識產權實體性條款進行分析。該部分先梳理了中國FTAs中知識產權實體性條款的規(guī)定情況，并選取遺傳資源、傳統知識和民間文藝保護條款、版權及相關權利保護條款、未披露信息保護條款為代表性條款進行深入分析。 第四部分對中國FTAs知識產權程序性條款進行分析。該部分選取爭端解決條款和知識產權執(zhí)法條款為分析對象，找出與TRIPS協定規(guī)定不一致之處，并分析執(zhí)法部分“超TRIPS”條款對我國執(zhí)法機構帶來的不利影響，以及爭端解決機制存在的問題。 第五部分總結分析了中國FTAs知識產權條款存在的問題。該部分在前述條款論述的基礎上總結出中國FTAs知識產權條款存在的整體性問題，主要有未形成范本模式，表述不夠嚴謹，協定內部某些條款缺乏協調性等。 第六部分論述了對我國FTAs知識產權條款的完善研究。該部分針對前述分析中國FTAs知識產權條款存在的問題，對我國日后簽訂FTA知識產權條款應對“超TRIPS”規(guī)則提供對策建議。 結語部分對全文進行總結。
[Abstract]:With the trade in goods and trade in services, the international cooperation in the protection of intellectual property rights has become an important part of international economic cooperation. The trips Agreement has many flexible provisions to cater for the interests of developing countries. In recent years, however, developed countries have failed to meet the level of intellectual property protection stipulated in the TRIPS Agreement and have sought to raise the level of intellectual property protection by various means. Developed countries regard free trade agreements as their main way of carrying out the "super TRIPS" clause, which brings a lot of pressure to developing countries whose economic development and intellectual property protection level are very different. China is the largest developing country under the TRIPS Agreement. There are many problems in the intellectual property provisions in the current FTAs, and the strategic arrangement system of the intellectual property Free Trade Agreement is also relatively weak, which is not sufficient to deal with the "super TRIPS" rules of the developed countries. This paper is based on the TRIPS Agreement. This paper studies the problems existing in the intellectual property provisions of China's FTAs and the new "super TRIPS" clauses, which provide a reference for China to sign the FTA intellectual property rules in the future. The article is divided into the following six parts:. The first part is an overview of the intellectual property provisions of China's FTAs. The article uses the historical analysis method, comparative analysis method, combing the current China signed seven free trade agreements containing intellectual property provisions of the provisions. The content of each FTA intellectual property clause is briefly introduced, and the proposition studied in this paper is put forward. The second part analyzes the general provisions of China's FTAs intellectual property rights. By means of comparative analysis and comprehensive analysis, the article compares the general provisions of China's FTAs intellectual property rights with those of the TRIPS Agreement, and finds out the problems existing in its structure and content. And analyze it. The third part analyzes the substantive provisions of intellectual property rights in China's FTAs. This part first combs the provisions of the substantive provisions of intellectual property rights in China's FTAs, and selects genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folk literature and art protection provisions. Copyright and related rights protection provisions, undisclosed information protection provisions for representative provisions for in-depth analysis. Part 4th analyzes the procedural provisions of intellectual property rights of FTAs in China. This part selects the dispute settlement clause and the enforcement clause of intellectual property as the object of analysis, and finds out the inconsistency with the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. It also analyzes the adverse effects of the "super TRIPS" clause on the law enforcement agencies in China and the existing problems in the dispute settlement mechanism. Part 5th summarizes and analyzes the problems existing in the intellectual property provisions of FTAs in China. The expression is not strict enough, some provisions of the agreement lack coordination and so on. Part 6th discusses the improvement of the FTAs intellectual property provisions in China. This part analyzes the problems existing in China's FTAs intellectual property provisions, and provides countermeasures and suggestions for the future signing of FTA intellectual property provisions in China in accordance with the "super TRIPS" rules. The conclusion part summarizes the full text.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 吳漢東;知識產權國際保護制度的變革與發(fā)展[J];法學研究;2005年03期

2 孫東雅;;醫(yī)藥數據知識產權法律保護[J];人民司法;2005年07期

3 李曉玲;陳雨松;;國際知識產權貿易談判的新方略[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2011年01期

4 吳漢東;;中國知識產權法制建設的評價與反思[J];中國法學;2009年01期

5 李冰;;《反假冒協議》邊境措施影響分析——基于《與貿易有關的知識產權協定》的對比[J];現代商貿工業(yè);2011年15期

6 陳慶;;超《TRIPS協定》條款對藥品專利強制許可的變異及應對策略[J];知識產權;2013年06期

本文編號：1632077