本文選題：域名　切入點：商標　出處：《華東政法大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：近年來，涉及互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡域名爭議的案件迅猛增長。在這些案件之中，涉及域名與商標權利沖突的案例占據(jù)了相當大的數(shù)量。 由于域名和商標在法律性質上具有相似點和沖突點，但卻分屬于不同的保護管理體系，因而需要一個全新的糾紛解決機制來協(xié)調這兩種權利間的沖突。 目前，對域名與商標爭議案件基本上有三種處理途徑，第一是由WIPO仲裁與調解中心以UDRP為仲裁規(guī)則，對爭議案件作出仲裁決定；第二是由爭議雙方當事人向法院提起訴訟，由法院作出判決；第三是雙方當事人私下解決，一般是通過支付對價轉讓的方式由一方最終獲得域名的所有權。由于目前在世界范圍內對于域名的權利屬性及其法律地位，域名與知識產權的關系等基本問題在知識產權界、法學界就此問題還沒有定論，并且在糾紛解決的實務方面，仲裁機構或法院也都對上述問題避而不談，雖然域名與商標的糾紛從產生至今已有將近二十年的歷史，但是與域名相關的法律問題仍處在探討階段。 由于各國對域名法律性質的定義不甚相同，且各國的法律制度關于商標權利、域名政策規(guī)定也有差異，必然造成在處理域名搶注侵犯商標權利的案件時認定標準不一。為了維護網(wǎng)絡世界的正常秩序，世界知識產權組織力圖為網(wǎng)絡空間的權益糾紛制定一種爭端解決機制，從而使全球范圍內的域名糾紛的解決能夠適用較為統(tǒng)一的一套標準。于是，世界知識產權組織（WIPO）、國際互聯(lián)網(wǎng)名稱和地址分配公司（ICANN）以及各國的網(wǎng)絡域名管理機構均出臺了一系列與域名與商標糾紛相關的解決政策。其中，《統(tǒng)一域名糾紛解決政策》（UDRP）作為一種強制性行政程序的統(tǒng)一域名爭端解決機制，其設立有效地協(xié)調各國的商標法律、和與域名相關的各項法規(guī)政策，并且它還包含有一套詳細的關于域名爭議解決的實體規(guī)則和程序規(guī)則，是WIPO仲裁與調解中心裁決域名爭端過程中所主要適用的實體法規(guī)則，構成了WIPO仲裁域名爭議的實體法體系的主要法律基礎。此外，這套類似于判例法的規(guī)則也廣泛適用于與域名相關的仲裁案件和訴訟案件。因此，，對這些規(guī)則進行研究對我國以及世界范圍內域名爭端解決機制的健全和完善具有至關重要的意義。雖然UDRP給域名與商標糾紛的解決提供了一定的法律基礎，但在如何適用UDRP規(guī)則方面，學界的相關研究并不多，特別是目前這種類似于判例法的仲裁方法，更需要對經(jīng)典案例的整理總結，并在此基礎上發(fā)現(xiàn)UDRP存在的缺陷，并針對問題提出解決方案。 本文從商標和域名的法律性質出發(fā)，分析二者產生沖突的原因和表現(xiàn)形式，通過對WIPO、ICANN和各國的域名糾紛的典型案例的分析與研究，結合現(xiàn)有的法律法規(guī)，對現(xiàn)有的商標與域名沖突解決機制進行總結，并在此基礎上提出自己的建議和改進方法。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in the number of cases involving disputes over domain names on the Internet. Among these cases, the number of cases involving conflicts between domain names and trademark rights has taken up a considerable number. Because domain names and trademarks have similarities and conflicts in legal nature, but they belong to different protection management systems, a new dispute resolution mechanism is needed to coordinate the conflict between the two rights. At present, there are basically three ways to deal with disputes over domain names and trademarks. The first is for the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center to take UDRP as the arbitration rule to make arbitration decisions in disputes; the second is for the parties to the dispute to file a lawsuit in court. The court will make the judgment; third, the parties will settle the matter in private, generally by paying for the transfer of consideration. One party will eventually acquire ownership of the domain name. Because of the nature of the domain name's rights and its legal status in the world at present, The relationship between domain names and intellectual property rights and other basic issues in the intellectual property field, the legal community has not yet decided on this issue, and in the practical aspects of dispute resolution, arbitration institutions or courts have also ignored these issues. Although it has been nearly 20 years since the dispute between domain name and trademark came into being, the legal problems related to domain name are still in the stage of discussion. Because the definition of the legal nature of domain name is not the same in different countries, and because of the differences of domain name policy in the legal system of each country about trademark rights, In order to maintain the normal order of the network world, the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO) tries to establish a dispute settlement mechanism for the rights and interests of cyberspace. So that a more uniform set of standards can be applied to the resolution of domain name disputes around the world. The World intellectual property Organization (WIPO), the Internet name and address Distribution Corporation (ICANN), and the national network domain name authorities have all issued a series of policies related to the resolution of domain names and trademark disputes. UDRP as a unified domain name dispute settlement mechanism for mandatory administrative procedures, Its establishment effectively harmonizes national trademark laws and regulations and policies relating to domain names, and it also contains a detailed set of substantive and procedural rules for domain name dispute resolution, It is the main applicable substantive law rule in the process of domain name dispute adjudication by WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, which forms the main legal basis of the substantive law system of WIPO arbitration domain name dispute. This set of rules, similar to case law, is also widely applicable to domain name related arbitration cases and litigation cases. The study of these rules is of vital importance to the perfection and perfection of domain name dispute settlement mechanism in China and all over the world. Although UDRP provides a legal basis for the settlement of disputes between domain name and trademark, However, there are few researches on how to apply UDRP rules, especially in the current arbitration method similar to case law, it is necessary to sort out and summarize the classical cases, and find the defects of UDRP on this basis. And put forward the solution to the problem. Starting from the legal nature of trademark and domain name, this paper analyzes the causes and manifestations of the conflict between them. Through the analysis and study of the typical cases of WIPOOICANN and domain name disputes in various countries, combined with the existing laws and regulations, This paper summarizes the existing conflict resolution mechanism between trademark and domain name, and puts forward some suggestions and improvement methods.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 徐飛;;淺析域名的性質及其與商標的沖突[J];網(wǎng)絡法律評論;2002年00期

本文編號：1626480