本文選題：逆向溢出效應(yīng)　切入點(diǎn)：技術(shù)尋求型對(duì)外直接投資　出處：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化趨勢(shì)不斷加強(qiáng)，企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)空前激烈，技術(shù)已經(jīng)成為決定企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)結(jié)果的關(guān)鍵因素。對(duì)外直接投資作為國(guó)際技術(shù)溢出的主要渠道，技術(shù)尋求型對(duì)外直接投資是獲取國(guó)外先進(jìn)技術(shù)、獲得逆向技術(shù)效應(yīng)的有效實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑。近年來，發(fā)展中國(guó)家的對(duì)外直接投資增長(zhǎng)迅速，越來越多的發(fā)展中國(guó)家試圖通過對(duì)外直接投資獲取國(guó)際逆向技術(shù)溢出。但是國(guó)內(nèi)外在對(duì)對(duì)外直接投資逆向效應(yīng)的研究中，，在研究對(duì)象的選取上不具備針對(duì)性。而改革開放以來，伴隨著“走出去”戰(zhàn)略的推進(jìn)，我國(guó)對(duì)歐盟技術(shù)尋求型直接投資取得了顯著的發(fā)展，使得研究中國(guó)對(duì)歐盟技術(shù)尋求型直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)成為可能。 本文在對(duì)直接投資理論和國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上，首先從投資規(guī)模、區(qū)位分布、行業(yè)選擇、進(jìn)入方式等方面對(duì)我國(guó)在歐盟直接投資的發(fā)展歷程及現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析，然后從微觀（企業(yè)）、中觀（產(chǎn)業(yè)）、宏觀（國(guó)家）三個(gè)層面分析對(duì)外直接投資引起母國(guó)技術(shù)進(jìn)步的機(jī)制，接著分別從投資母國(guó)、東道國(guó)角度分析影響母國(guó)逆向技術(shù)效應(yīng)的因素。在理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上，本文依據(jù)我國(guó)對(duì)歐盟對(duì)外直接投資數(shù)據(jù)，運(yùn)用LP模型測(cè)算了通過OFDI渠道溢出的外國(guó)研發(fā)資本存量，并采用國(guó)際RD溢出回歸方法，并且運(yùn)用狀態(tài)空間計(jì)量模型來構(gòu)造變參數(shù)模型，就逆向技術(shù)溢出對(duì)全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響作了實(shí)證分析。結(jié)果顯示，對(duì)外直接投資產(chǎn)生的逆向技術(shù)溢出能夠?qū)θ厣a(chǎn)率產(chǎn)生積極影響，但作用強(qiáng)度較小。其主要原因在于：中國(guó)對(duì)歐盟技術(shù)尋求型OFDI規(guī)模較小；對(duì)歐盟投資的產(chǎn)業(yè)集中在技術(shù)密集度相對(duì)低的行業(yè)。東道國(guó)豐富的資本、較高的經(jīng)濟(jì)開放程度與較強(qiáng)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)力度對(duì)我國(guó)OFDI逆向技術(shù)溢出的吸收具有促進(jìn)作用。技術(shù)差距對(duì)我國(guó)逆向技術(shù)溢出的作用不顯著。基于以上結(jié)論，最后從微觀企業(yè)和宏觀政府兩個(gè)角度提出對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:With the increasing trend of economic globalization and the unprecedented fierce competition among enterprises, technology has become the key factor to determine the outcome of competition. Foreign direct investment (FDI) is the main channel of international technology spillover. Technology seeking foreign direct investment (FDI) is an effective way to obtain foreign advanced technology and reverse technology effect. In recent years, FDI in developing countries has increased rapidly. More and more developing countries try to obtain international reverse technology spillover through FDI. However, in the research of reverse effect of FDI, there is no pertinence in the selection of research object. Since the reform and opening up, With the development of "going out" strategy, China has made remarkable progress in technology seeking direct investment in EU, which makes it possible to study the reverse technology spillover effect of Chinese technology seeking direct investment in EU. On the basis of summarizing the theory of direct investment and related literature at home and abroad, this paper first analyzes the development course and present situation of China's direct investment in the EU from the aspects of investment scale, location distribution, industry choice, entry mode, etc. Then, it analyzes the mechanism of technological progress caused by FDI from three aspects of micro (enterprise, medium (industry), macro (country)), and then analyzes the mechanism of technology progress in home country from the point of view of investment in home country. On the basis of theoretical analysis, this paper uses LP model to calculate the stock of foreign R & D capital spillover through OFDI channel according to the data of China's foreign direct investment in the European Union (EU) based on the analysis of the factors affecting the effect of reverse technology in the home country from the point of view of the host country. By adopting the international Rd spillover regression method and using the state-space econometric model to construct the variable parameter model, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the impact of reverse technology spillover on the total factor productivity. The reverse technology spillover from OFDI can have a positive impact on TFP, but the effect intensity is relatively small. The main reason is that China has a small scale of technology-seeking OFDI in EU; Investment in the EU is concentrated in industries with relatively low technological intensity. The higher degree of economic openness and the stronger protection of intellectual property rights can promote the absorption of reverse technology spillover of OFDI in China, but the effect of technology gap on reverse technology spillover of our country is not significant. Finally, from the micro-enterprise and macro-government two angles to put forward the countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F752.67;F752.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林青;陳湛勻;;中國(guó)技術(shù)尋求型跨國(guó)投資戰(zhàn)略:理論與實(shí)證研究——基于主要10個(gè)國(guó)家FDI反向溢出效應(yīng)模型的測(cè)度[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2008年06期

2 蔡冬青;劉厚俊;;中國(guó)OFDI反向技術(shù)溢出影響因素研究——基于東道國(guó)制度環(huán)境的視角[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2012年05期

3 劉明霞;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——基于省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)(對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年04期

4 魏守華;姜寧;吳貴生;;內(nèi)生創(chuàng)新努力、本土技術(shù)溢出與長(zhǎng)三角高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年02期

5 張宏;王建;;東道國(guó)區(qū)位因素與中國(guó)OFDI關(guān)系研究——基于分量回歸的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年06期

6 溫小杰;;技術(shù)缺口引致技術(shù)尋求型對(duì)外直接投資——以機(jī)床制造業(yè)為例[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年07期

7 杜群陽;;R&D全球化、反向外溢與技術(shù)獲取型FDI[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2006年12期

8 劉海云;規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)與發(fā)展中國(guó)家的對(duì)外直接投資[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;1998年08期

9 商務(wù)部研究院課題組;章海源;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資戰(zhàn)略選擇——《對(duì)外直接投資公司調(diào)查問卷》分析報(bào)告[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2006年07期

10 趙偉;古廣東;何元慶;;外向FDI與中國(guó)技術(shù)進(jìn)步:機(jī)理分析與嘗試性實(shí)證[J];管理世界;2006年07期

本文編號(hào)：1583280