行政約談法律問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-08 16:47
【摘要】：自從2003年由稅務(wù)部門從香港引入大陸之后,行政約談在價格調(diào)控、食品安全、消費維權(quán)、環(huán)境保護、市場監(jiān)管等諸多領(lǐng)域迅速發(fā)展,得到廣泛應(yīng)用,可謂是遍地開花。但在理論上,對行政約談的行為界定和法律屬性卻存在較多爭議,界于我們一貫堅持的法治是具有形式理性的法律的統(tǒng)治,認為不能從法律上構(gòu)建的問題沒有法律意義。因而對行政約談這種新興的柔性執(zhí)法方式,如何定性,如何構(gòu)建,才能實現(xiàn)形式化法律的最大確定性問題的探討,成為了目前學(xué)者對該問題研究的主要著陸點。因此對行政約談概念的定義,法律屬性的探討,是獨立行政行為還是非獨立行政行為,是法律行為還是事實行為成了不可回避的問題。這種形式化的爭論實則是受以“行政權(quán)”為核心構(gòu)建起來的傳統(tǒng)行政法學(xué)理論的束縛。而以“關(guān)系”為視角構(gòu)建起來的平衡論,則把行政約談看作是公共利益與個人利益實現(xiàn)動態(tài)平衡的一種方式,納入積極行政的范疇,恰到好處的突破了這種形式藩籬。本文從“新行政法”、平衡理論、柔性執(zhí)法的監(jiān)管方式等方面對行政約談產(chǎn)生的背景作了系統(tǒng)概括,并對行政約談的法律屬性、獨立性、行為屬性進行比較分析,著重闡述。實踐中的行政約談,雖然應(yīng)用廣泛也取得了良好的社會效果,但缺乏高位階的法律依據(jù),亦無規(guī)范式的程序規(guī)制,并不具有制度上的構(gòu)建性。在實際運用中,很多部門都是結(jié)合本部門的情況,舊瓶裝新酒的將各自原有的一些柔性的工作方式方法運用進來,立法的空白、程序適用上的不確定都使行政約談行為存在被濫用和異化的風險。因此,對行政約談行為的規(guī)制便成為值得探討的問題。但是該如何將其法治化,從哪些方面著手,才能在我國目前的法律體系背景上具有更強的構(gòu)建性是一個值得思考的問題。本文試圖從立法、程序和救濟途徑上將行政約談囊括進法制的框架內(nèi),對行政約談法治化路徑提出建議,以期能對理論構(gòu)建提供一種新的思路。
[Abstract]:Since the tax department introduced the mainland from Hong Kong in 2003, administrative interviews have been widely used in many fields, such as price control, food safety, consumer rights protection, environmental protection, market supervision and so on. However, in theory, there are many disputes about the definition and legal attribute of administrative interview. The rule of law, which we have always insisted on, is the rule of law with formal rationality, and there is no legal significance for the problem that can not be constructed from the law. Therefore, the discussion of how to define and construct the new flexible law enforcement method of administrative interview to realize the maximum certainty of formal law has become the main landing point for scholars to study this problem. Therefore, the definition of the concept of administrative interview and the discussion of the legal attribute, whether the independent administrative act or the non-independent administrative act, the legal act or the factual act has become an unavoidable question. In fact, this formal argument is bound by the traditional theory of administrative law constructed with "administrative power" as the core. The balance theory, which is constructed from the angle of "relationship", regards administrative interview as a way to realize dynamic balance between public interest and personal interest, and it is brought into the category of active administration, which just breaks through this kind of formal barrier. This paper systematically generalizes the background of administrative interview from the aspects of "new administrative law", balance theory and supervision mode of flexible law enforcement, and makes a comparative analysis of the legal attribute, independence and behavior attribute of administrative interview, with emphasis on expounding. The administrative interview in practice, although it has been widely used, has obtained good social effect, but it lacks the legal basis of high rank, and there is no standard procedural regulation, so it does not have the system construction. In practical use, many departments are considering the situation in their own departments. Old bottles of new wine apply their original flexible working methods to the legislative blank. The uncertainty of procedure application causes the risk of abuse and alienation of administrative interview behavior. Therefore, the regulation of administrative interview behavior is worth discussing. However, how to rule by law and from what aspects can we construct more strongly in the background of our country's current legal system is a problem worth thinking about. This paper attempts to include administrative interviews in the framework of legal system from the perspective of legislation, procedure and remedies, and to make suggestions on the path of rule of law by law in administrative interviews, in order to provide a new way of thinking for the construction of theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1
本文編號：2418570
[Abstract]:Since the tax department introduced the mainland from Hong Kong in 2003, administrative interviews have been widely used in many fields, such as price control, food safety, consumer rights protection, environmental protection, market supervision and so on. However, in theory, there are many disputes about the definition and legal attribute of administrative interview. The rule of law, which we have always insisted on, is the rule of law with formal rationality, and there is no legal significance for the problem that can not be constructed from the law. Therefore, the discussion of how to define and construct the new flexible law enforcement method of administrative interview to realize the maximum certainty of formal law has become the main landing point for scholars to study this problem. Therefore, the definition of the concept of administrative interview and the discussion of the legal attribute, whether the independent administrative act or the non-independent administrative act, the legal act or the factual act has become an unavoidable question. In fact, this formal argument is bound by the traditional theory of administrative law constructed with "administrative power" as the core. The balance theory, which is constructed from the angle of "relationship", regards administrative interview as a way to realize dynamic balance between public interest and personal interest, and it is brought into the category of active administration, which just breaks through this kind of formal barrier. This paper systematically generalizes the background of administrative interview from the aspects of "new administrative law", balance theory and supervision mode of flexible law enforcement, and makes a comparative analysis of the legal attribute, independence and behavior attribute of administrative interview, with emphasis on expounding. The administrative interview in practice, although it has been widely used, has obtained good social effect, but it lacks the legal basis of high rank, and there is no standard procedural regulation, so it does not have the system construction. In practical use, many departments are considering the situation in their own departments. Old bottles of new wine apply their original flexible working methods to the legislative blank. The uncertainty of procedure application causes the risk of abuse and alienation of administrative interview behavior. Therefore, the regulation of administrative interview behavior is worth discussing. However, how to rule by law and from what aspects can we construct more strongly in the background of our country's current legal system is a problem worth thinking about. This paper attempts to include administrative interviews in the framework of legal system from the perspective of legislation, procedure and remedies, and to make suggestions on the path of rule of law by law in administrative interviews, in order to provide a new way of thinking for the construction of theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬迅;楊海坤;;行政約談實效性的保障機制建構(gòu)——兼論約談法治化進階[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2017年01期
2 龐鵬;;試論行政約談機制的可訴性及實現(xiàn)路徑[J];知與行;2016年02期
3 何偉日;鄭雅莉;;行政約談制度的緣起、運行與規(guī)制[J];嶺南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年01期
4 朱志梅;;柔性執(zhí)法與社會組織監(jiān)管機制的創(chuàng)新[J];河北法學(xué);2014年02期
5 張福剛;;生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的法治保障——以環(huán)境行政執(zhí)法約談法治化為視角[J];毛澤東鄧小平理論研究;2013年06期
6 于舒;;發(fā)改委“約談”行為的法律分析[J];法制與社會;2012年17期
7 鄧佑文;;論行政參與權(quán)與行政法律關(guān)系的變革[J];東岳論叢;2012年04期
8 李慶;;行政約談制度的法治化[J];中央社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期
9 胡賁;;部委“約談”——剛?cè)峒婢叩谋O(jiān)管新概念[J];價格與市場;2011年07期
10 張敬偉;;價格約談—中國特色價格監(jiān)管新模式[J];價格與市場;2011年06期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 李冰;段麗斌;趙偉;;教育手段在行政執(zhí)法中的運用研究[A];2008年政府法制研究[C];2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 梁曉楠;行政約談行為研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2015年
2 葛然;當代行政法視野中的行政約談研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2418570
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2418570.html
最近更新
教材專著
