中美公眾參與環(huán)境影響評價法律制度的比較研究
[Abstract]:As an important means of national environmental management, environmental impact assessment system plays an important role in coordinating economic and social development and environmental protection. As the principle of environmental impact assessment, public participation not only embodies environmental fairness and justice, but also helps to improve the correctness and acceptability of government environmental decisions. The United States is the first country to establish and implement an environmental impact assessment system in the form of legislation. Since 1969, when the United States adopted the National Environmental Policy Act to establish the system of public participation in environmental impact assessment, it has been rapidly implemented in various countries. The system of public participation in environmental impact assessment has been written into the laws of various countries, thus establishing the legal system of public participation in environmental impact assessment. Although our country started late, it has also developed rapidly in recent years. Since the 2002 Environmental impact Assessment Act, the public participation in the EIA system has been stipulated as an important content for the first time. By April 2014, the Environmental Protection Law had been revised, and the chapter "Environmental Information openness and Public participation" was set up, which defined the citizens' right to obtain information, participate in and supervise, and stipulated the procedure of public participation. However, compared with the United States, there are still many shortcomings in our country. This paper introduces the main body of public participation in the environmental impact assessment system between the United States and China. After comparing and analyzing the way of public participation and the three aspects of environmental information disclosure, the paper points out that the scope of the main body in our country is not clear, and the problem of not paying attention to the development of environmental protection NGO is pointed out. The paper also puts forward some measures to solve the problems, such as the perfection of public hearing system and the improvement of the main contents of environmental information disclosure system.
【學位授予單位】:哈爾濱工程大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D971.2;D922.68
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 曹明德;;中國環(huán)保非政府組織存在和發(fā)展的政策法律分析[J];清華法治論衡;2013年03期
2 謝茗;曾軍龍;;國外企業(yè)環(huán)境信息公開制度的經(jīng)驗及其對我國的啟示[J];環(huán)境保護與循環(huán)經(jīng)濟;2012年11期
3 瑋娜;都布;;試比較中美政府與NGO在環(huán)保體系中的作用[J];WTO經(jīng)濟導刊;2012年07期
4 劉艷文;;增強環(huán)境影響評價中公眾參與有效性的探索[J];北方環(huán)境;2012年03期
5 張新華;陳婷;;中美環(huán)保NGO發(fā)展比較及對中國的啟示[J];環(huán)境科學與管理;2011年08期
6 鄧國勝;;中國環(huán)保NGO發(fā)展指數(shù)研究[J];中國非營利評論;2010年02期
7 彭光明;宋占新;;美國環(huán)境影響評價聽證制度及對我國的啟示[J];商業(yè)時代;2009年35期
8 彭峰;;法國公眾參與環(huán)境保護原則的實施及其對我國的借鑒[J];環(huán)境科學與技術;2009年11期
9 陳冰照;;日本環(huán)境影響評價中的公眾參與及其借鑒[J];化學工程與裝備;2009年09期
10 楊凌雁;;試析環(huán)境影響評價程序中的公眾參與[J];湖北社會科學;2009年05期
相關碩士學位論文 前10條
1 楊丹萍;我國環(huán)境信息公開制度研究[D];昆明理工大學;2012年
2 許秋莉;我國環(huán)境信息公開法律制度探究[D];中央民族大學;2012年
3 楊飛;我國環(huán)境影響評價公眾參與制度研究[D];山東大學;2011年
4 李小紅;中美公眾參與環(huán)保行為影響因素比較研究[D];西北大學;2010年
5 劉惠賢;我國環(huán)境法公眾參與制度之研究[D];汕頭大學;2010年
6 王國鋒;美國與德國環(huán)境影響評價制度中公眾參與機制對比研究[D];鄭州大學;2010年
7 吳勝亮;公眾參與環(huán)境影響評價制度研究[D];復旦大學;2010年
8 趙國良;我國公眾參與環(huán)境影響評價立法現(xiàn)狀及問題研究[D];遼寧工程技術大學;2009年
9 董瑞海;公眾參與環(huán)境影響評價機制研究[D];天津大學;2009年
10 勵向南;中國企業(yè)環(huán)境信息披露制度初探[D];復旦大學;2009年
,本文編號:2417879
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2417879.html