【摘要】：我國在人身損害賠償體系中存在死亡賠償金的雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn),在媒體和公眾的解讀中以“同命不同價”的說法備受質(zhì)疑,法學(xué)界對死亡賠償金的性質(zhì)也未達(dá)成一致意見。近年來,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展,城鄉(xiāng)一體化進(jìn)程加快,雙重賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)已經(jīng)改變。在日趨社會化的道路交通事故賠償體系中,雙重賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)已顯示出滯后性,帶來一些負(fù)面影響。隨著戶籍制度改革的深入,城鄉(xiāng)差別的進(jìn)一步縮小,有必要立足于道路交通事故的特點(diǎn),借鑒域外以及我國立法中的經(jīng)驗,建立完善配套機(jī)制,在一定地域內(nèi)逐步統(tǒng)一城鄉(xiāng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 文章結(jié)構(gòu)上主要包括五個部分,第一個部分為導(dǎo)論,總結(jié)國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對死亡賠償制度的研究現(xiàn)狀,指出本文的寫作目的；第二個部分指出道路交通事故糾紛司法實(shí)踐中存在虛假證據(jù)的現(xiàn)象；第三個部分介紹死亡賠償雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的法律淵源和理論淵源；第四個部分指出統(tǒng)一賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的必要性；第五個部分是統(tǒng)一賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的可行性思考,提出一些建議。
[Abstract]:There is a double standard of compensation for death in the system of compensation for personal injury in our country. In the interpretation of the media and the public, the theory of "the same life is not the same price" has been questioned, and the legal circles have not reached a consensus on the nature of the compensation for death. In recent years, with the development of economy and society, the process of urban-rural integration has been accelerated, and the realistic foundation of double compensation standard has been changed. In the increasingly socialized compensation system for road traffic accidents, double compensation standards have shown lag and brought some negative effects. With the deepening of the reform of the household registration system and the further narrowing of the differences between urban and rural areas, it is necessary to base on the characteristics of road traffic accidents, to learn from the experience of foreign countries and in our country's legislation, and to establish and improve the supporting mechanism. Gradually unify the urban and rural standards within a certain area. The structure of the article mainly consists of five parts, the first part is an introduction, summarizes the domestic and foreign scholars on the death compensation system research status, pointing out the purpose of this paper; The second part points out the phenomenon of false evidence in the judicial practice of road traffic accident dispute; the third part introduces the legal origin and theoretical origin of the double standard of death compensation; the fourth part points out the necessity of unifying the standard of compensation. The fifth part is the feasibility of unified compensation standards, and put forward some suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁慧星;;中國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法解說[J];北方法學(xué);2011年01期

2 王利明;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的中國特色[J];法學(xué)家;2010年02期

3 孫鵬;徐銀波;;我國死亡損害賠償?shù)牧⒄搶徦寂c制度完善[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2012年02期

4 楊立新;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法立法最新討論的50個問題[J];河北法學(xué);2009年12期

5 麻昌華;宋敏;;論死亡賠償?shù)牧⒎ㄟx擇[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 張潛偉;;生命的價值學(xué)說的價值與死亡賠償——兼論精神損害賠償?shù)挠嬎愎絒J];河北法學(xué);2013年03期

7 孫鵬;;“同命”真該“同價”?——對死亡損害賠償?shù)拿穹ㄋ伎糩J];法學(xué)論壇;2007年02期

8 盧志剛;章根明;;道路交通事故受害人社會化救濟(jì)機(jī)制探討[J];社會科學(xué)家;2012年02期

9 張新寶;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》死亡賠償制度解讀[J];中國法學(xué);2010年03期

10 孫鵬;胡建;;死亡損害賠償額的算定——以法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析為視角[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2012年11期

，

本文編號：2395179