中央對地方轉(zhuǎn)移支付中醫(yī)藥項(xiàng)目事權(quán)劃分的研究
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the quality of life of people is improving, the health of people is becoming more and more concerned, and people pay more and more attention to how to keep fit, especially to the traditional Chinese medicine service. In recent years, Chinese medicine has been widely welcomed in foreign countries. The state also pays more and more attention to the development of traditional Chinese medicine, constantly increasing the scale of financial investment in traditional Chinese medicine, and the central government to the local transfer of traditional Chinese medicine projects also continue to increase. With the rapid development of traditional Chinese medicine, there are some problems in the division of the central government's right to transfer payment of traditional Chinese medicine. It is particularly important to clearly divide the power of the central government to transfer payment of traditional Chinese medicine. In this study, the central to local transfer of traditional Chinese medicine project as the research object, through the theory of public goods, government function theory, limited government theory, fiscal decentralization theory and principal-agent theory, This paper analyzes the theoretical basis of dividing the power of Chinese medicine projects. By reading a large number of documents and collecting data, this paper analyzes the current situation of the scale of financial input and the division of power of Chinese medicine projects in the transfer payment in China. This paper probes into the problems existing in the division of the power of the local transfer payment in the traditional Chinese medicine project and analyzes the reasons. By means of comparative analysis, this paper analyzes and summarizes the division of the central and local governments' health rights in the United States, Germany, France and Japan. This is the reference and inspiration of the central government to the local government transfer payment of traditional Chinese medicine project. By summing up the basic principles that should be attached importance to in the division of administrative powers, on the basis of the basic contents of the Chinese Medicine Law of the people's Republic of China, and through the method of expert interviews, Construct the basic frame of the central government to the local transfer payment of traditional Chinese medicine project power division. Finally, from the following three aspects: rationally dividing the authority of Chinese medicine projects, perfecting the allocation of financial power between the central and local Chinese medicine projects, and perfecting the transfer payment of local Chinese medicine projects by the central authorities, To put forward suggestions for the implementation and management of the division and management of local transfer payment for traditional Chinese medicine project by the central government.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D922.16;R288
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 ;福建實(shí)現(xiàn)三級事權(quán)劃分[J];中國藥事;2002年10期
2 凌以文;省市縣藥品監(jiān)管部門事權(quán)劃分之我見[J];中國藥事;2004年10期
3 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 李雪峰;張?zhí)焓?;內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)基層政府提供公共服務(wù)困境及求解[A];“中國特色社會(huì)主義行政管理體制”研討會(huì)暨中國行政管理學(xué)會(huì)第20屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 古曉杰;廣東印發(fā)食品藥品監(jiān)管事權(quán)劃分指導(dǎo)意見[N];中國醫(yī)藥報(bào);2014年
2 記者 祿永峰;市委市政府召開動(dòng)員會(huì)議要求確保7月底前全面完成市區(qū)事權(quán)劃分任務(wù)[N];隴東報(bào);2005年
3 中國社科院財(cái)經(jīng)戰(zhàn)略研究院 張斌;事權(quán)劃分是完善分稅制的核心[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2013年
4 財(cái)政部財(cái)政科學(xué)研究所 賈康 梁季;事權(quán)劃分是分稅制改革基礎(chǔ)環(huán)節(jié)[N];中國證券報(bào);2013年
5 記者 黃天洲;黃選平主持召開市委一屆66次常委會(huì)議研究市區(qū)事權(quán)劃分等工作[N];隴東報(bào);2005年
6 黃喜勝 羅敏;事權(quán)劃分有新“動(dòng)作”[N];牡丹江日報(bào);2006年
7 記者 趙巍 通訊員 徐梅芳 付景龍;年底前完成24項(xiàng)重點(diǎn)改革任務(wù)[N];三峽日報(bào);2014年
8 記者 姜玉勇;討論研究市區(qū)城市規(guī)劃建設(shè)管理事權(quán)劃分等事宜[N];張掖日報(bào);2013年
9 瓏銘;地方官員與中央唱反調(diào)的深層次原因[N];上海證券報(bào);2006年
10 記者 楊希民 通訊員 聶孟琪;該放的放完 該管的管好[N];中國醫(yī)藥報(bào);2002年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 周杰;中央與地方事權(quán)劃分的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)原因研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年
2 文政;基于中央與地方政府間關(guān)系的財(cái)政支出事權(quán)劃分模式研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 蔣曉艷;昆明市五華區(qū)城市基層社會(huì)治理中政府與社區(qū)事權(quán)劃分研究[D];云南大學(xué);2016年
2 蔡文彬;吉林省縣(市)級政府財(cái)權(quán)和事權(quán)劃分問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年
3 許可塑;中央對地方轉(zhuǎn)移支付中醫(yī)藥項(xiàng)目事權(quán)劃分的研究[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2017年
4 吳洛嬋;央地事權(quán)劃分的法治思考[D];南京工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
5 唐琳;我國政府間交叉事權(quán)配置合理化研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年
6 殷豪;各級政府事權(quán)劃分問題研究及對策建議[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年
7 王忠旭;從分稅制透視中央地方權(quán)力關(guān)系的困境與出路[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
8 王乃斌;中央與地方政府財(cái)權(quán)與事權(quán)劃分中存在的問題及對策分析[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年
9 楊甜;公共服務(wù)視閾下貧困地區(qū)縣政府財(cái)權(quán)事權(quán)研究[D];云南大學(xué);2011年
10 張春肖;中央與地方財(cái)權(quán)、事權(quán)關(guān)系范圍劃分的研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號:2394426
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2394426.html