本文選題：非訴行政執(zhí)行　切入點(diǎn)：救濟(jì)制度　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：非訴行政執(zhí)行是我國行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行制度的重要組成部分，它以國家強(qiáng)制力為基礎(chǔ)保障行政行為的最終實(shí)現(xiàn)。由于缺乏統(tǒng)一的立法規(guī)定，我國現(xiàn)行非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度存在諸多問題。“無救濟(jì)則無權(quán)利”，，這一句古老的諺語道出了救濟(jì)與權(quán)利的關(guān)系以及救濟(jì)的必要性。本文試圖從非訴行政執(zhí)行的基本概念入手，分析我國相關(guān)執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀和理論主張，剖析我國現(xiàn)行執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度存在的問題，借鑒民事執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的有益成果，提出了構(gòu)建我國非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的建議。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分，各部分的主要內(nèi)容是： 第一部分是非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度概述。該部分是全文的理論基礎(chǔ)，包括了非訴行政執(zhí)行的概念、性質(zhì)，非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的概念、范圍等內(nèi)容。 第二部分是我國非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀。該部分對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行立法中存在的相關(guān)救濟(jì)制度進(jìn)行了論證，通過對(duì)執(zhí)行復(fù)議、聽證、執(zhí)行異議、異議之訴等具體救濟(jì)制度的剖析，發(fā)現(xiàn)執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度在立法上的閃光點(diǎn)和存在的問題。 第三部分是有關(guān)我國非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的理論主張。該部分對(duì)我國理論界有關(guān)非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的理論主張進(jìn)行了論述。其中，著重對(duì)執(zhí)行訴訟、上訴、檢察監(jiān)督等幾個(gè)具有代表性的救濟(jì)制度主張進(jìn)行了評(píng)析。 最后一部分是構(gòu)建我國非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的建議。該部分是本文的核心內(nèi)容，也是本文的研究目的所在。在該部分中，首先確立了構(gòu)建我國非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度應(yīng)秉承的原則，搭建了非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的框架。其次，通過對(duì)聽證制度、執(zhí)行復(fù)議、執(zhí)行異議、異議之訴等具體救濟(jì)制度的闡述提出了構(gòu)建我國非訴行政執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度的具體建議。
[Abstract]:Non-litigation administrative execution is an important part of the administrative enforcement system in China. It guarantees the ultimate realization of administrative action on the basis of national coercive force. There are many problems in the current relief system of non-litigation administrative execution in our country. "No remedy means no right". This ancient proverb reveals the relationship between relief and right and the necessity of relief. This paper attempts to start with the basic concept of non-litigation administrative execution. This paper analyzes the current legislative situation and theoretical propositions of the relevant enforcement relief system in China, analyzes the problems existing in the current enforcement relief system of our country, and draws lessons from the beneficial results of the civil enforcement relief system. Some suggestions are put forward to construct the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution in our country. This paper is divided into four parts, the main content of each part is:. The first part is an overview of the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution, which is the theoretical basis of the full text, including the concept, nature, concept and scope of non-litigation administrative execution relief system. The second part is the legislative status of the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution in China. This part demonstrates the existing relief system in the current legislation of our country, through the executive reconsideration, hearing, execution objection, The analysis of the specific relief system, such as dissent lawsuit, finds out the glittering point and existing problems in the legislation of executive relief system. The third part is about the theory of non-litigation administrative enforcement relief system in China. This part discusses the theory of non-litigation administrative enforcement relief system in our country. Procuratorial supervision and other representative relief system proposals were evaluated. The last part is the suggestion of constructing the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution in our country. This part is the core content of this paper, and is also the purpose of this paper. First of all, it establishes the principle of constructing the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution in our country, and sets up the framework of the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution. Secondly, through the hearing system, the execution of reconsideration, the execution of dissent. The specific relief system, such as dissent action, is expounded, and some concrete suggestions are put forward to construct the relief system of non-litigation administrative execution in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

2 童兆洪,林翔榮;民事執(zhí)行救濟(jì)制度芻論[J];比較法研究;2002年03期

3 張華;關(guān)于我國執(zhí)行異議制度的法律思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年11期

4 榮曉莉;;非訴訟行政執(zhí)行相關(guān)問題探究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年04期

5 陳亞平;各國行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行制度之比較研究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1991年06期

6 馬登科;程序上的執(zhí)行救濟(jì)與實(shí)體上的執(zhí)行救濟(jì)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年08期

7 邵正洪;執(zhí)行異議與執(zhí)行異議之訴——關(guān)于改革執(zhí)行異議制度的思考[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年08期

8 楊逸強(qiáng);;非訴行政執(zhí)行制度的理論和實(shí)踐[J];法律適用;2006年05期

9 章志遠(yuǎn);德國《行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行法》述評(píng)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年01期

10 楊建順;;日本行政執(zhí)行制度研究[J];法學(xué)家;2002年04期

本文編號(hào)：1630212