本文選題：行政慣例　切入點(diǎn)：司法適用　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著越來(lái)越多的學(xué)者開(kāi)始呼吁承認(rèn)行政慣例的法源地位,已經(jīng)有目光獨(dú)到的學(xué)者開(kāi)始探討行政慣例的制度化路徑問(wèn)題,嘗試對(duì)行政慣例所涉及的司法適用問(wèn)題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)規(guī)范。對(duì)行政慣例的研究之所以能夠如火如荼地開(kāi)展,很大的原因在于其在實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域發(fā)展迅速,并且起到了積極的作用。行政慣例能夠解決司法實(shí)踐中法律所缺失的問(wèn)題,以一定的約定俗成的規(guī)則約束人們的行為,并且這一方法也得到了執(zhí)法者和被執(zhí)法者的認(rèn)可。然而,僅僅討論行政慣例的法源地位,探索行政慣例的制度化路徑并不能足以解決司法領(lǐng)域有關(guān)行政慣例的適用問(wèn)題。目前,在我國(guó)行政訴訟中,確實(shí)存在著有關(guān)行政慣例適用爭(zhēng)議的審判,然而審判中對(duì)行政慣例的適用卻是混亂不一。由于沒(méi)有統(tǒng)一的態(tài)度、適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及適用程序,不同的法院、法官在對(duì)行政慣例的適用上標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一。這就造成了實(shí)踐中行政慣例很難規(guī)范化適用。行政慣例的制度化是對(duì)執(zhí)法領(lǐng)域行政行為的規(guī)制,要想完善司法實(shí)踐中有關(guān)行政慣例的適用問(wèn)題,還需構(gòu)建較為系統(tǒng)的制度。本課題便是基于對(duì)行政慣例在司法中規(guī)范適用的需要出發(fā)確定的。論文主要分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分,行政慣例司法適用可行性的一般理論。該部分主要為行政慣例的司法適用進(jìn)行理論鋪墊。筆者首先對(duì)行政慣例進(jìn)行理論界定,主要討論了行政慣例的生成背景和原因、行政慣例的概念、構(gòu)成要件和法源地位。其次,筆者對(duì)所選課題題目進(jìn)行了解讀。將話題的討論界定在有益的范圍內(nèi)。最后,結(jié)合我國(guó)目前行政慣例在實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用的基本情況,筆者詳細(xì)分析了行政慣例司法適用的價(jià)值。第二部分,行政慣例司法適用的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。該部分從“基本理論研究的逐漸成熟”、“域外先進(jìn)理論和實(shí)踐的借鑒”以及“本國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中案例的思考”三個(gè)角度分析了行政慣例司法適用的現(xiàn)實(shí)可行性。第三部分,行政慣例司法適用的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境及成因分析。該部分基于我國(guó)行政執(zhí)法、司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)行政慣例的態(tài)度和行政慣例在我國(guó)的存在現(xiàn)狀,分析行政慣例司法適用的困難,并探討適用困境背后的原因。第四部分,行政慣例司法適用困境的排解。該部分是本文的難點(diǎn)和創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。筆者從行政慣例司法適用的位階、審查、效力層次等方面尋找可行對(duì)策,對(duì)前述行政慣例司法適用的困境進(jìn)行排除。第五部分,結(jié)論。該部分為論文的總結(jié)部分。筆者首先對(duì)全文進(jìn)行回顧總結(jié),其次對(duì)全文的不足和前景展望進(jìn)行反思與分析。
[Abstract]:As more and more scholars begin to call for the recognition of the legal status of administrative practice, scholars with unique vision have begun to explore the path of institutionalization of administrative practice. Try to regulate the judicial application of administrative practice systematically. The research on administrative practice can be carried out in full swing because of its rapid development in the field of practice. And has played a positive role. Administrative practice can solve the lack of legal problems in judicial practice, with a certain set of rules to restrict people's behavior, and this method is also recognized by the law enforcers and the law enforcement. However, It is not enough to discuss the legal status of administrative practice and explore the way of institutionalization of administrative practice. At present, in the administrative litigation of our country, it is not enough to solve the problem of the application of administrative practice in the judicial field. There is indeed a trial concerning the application of administrative practice in dispute, but the application of administrative practice in the trial is mixed. Due to the lack of a uniform attitude, the applicable standard and the applicable procedure, different courts, There are different standards in the application of administrative practices by judges. This makes it difficult to standardize the application of administrative practices in practice. The institutionalization of administrative practices is the regulation of administrative acts in the field of law enforcement. To improve the application of administrative practices in judicial practice, This subject is based on the need to regulate the application of administrative practices in the administration of justice. The paper is mainly divided into five parts. The general theory of the feasibility of judicial application of administrative practice. This part mainly lays the groundwork for the theory of judicial application of administrative practice. Firstly, the author defines the theory of administrative practice, mainly discusses the background and reasons of the formation of administrative practice. Secondly, the author interprets the topic of the selected topic, and defines the discussion of the topic within a beneficial scope. Finally, combined with the basic situation of our country's current administrative practice in practice, The author analyzes the value of judicial application of administrative practice in detail. The practical basis of judicial application of administrative practice. This part analyzes administrative habituation from three angles: "the gradual maturity of basic theoretical research", "the reference of foreign advanced theory and practice" and "the thinking of cases in domestic judicial practice" Practical feasibility of judicial application. Part three, This part is based on the administrative law enforcement, the attitude to the administrative practice in the judicial practice and the existing situation of the administrative practice in our country, and analyzes the difficulties of the judicial application of the administrative practice. The author also discusses the reasons behind the dilemma of application. Part 4th, the solution of the dilemma of judicial application of administrative practices. This part is the difficulty and innovation of this article. In order to find the feasible countermeasures on the level of validity and so on, the author eliminates the dilemma of the judicial application of the administrative practice mentioned above. 5th part, conclusion. This part is the summary part of the thesis. First, the author reviews and summarizes the full text. Secondly, it reflects and analyzes the deficiency and prospect of the paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 鄭潔;;行政慣例的成因及其適用[J];杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

2 趙維貞;美國(guó)成文法與傳統(tǒng)大陸法系成文法立法理念比較研究[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

3 林泰;;論行政慣例的幾個(gè)基本問(wèn)題——從我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)“馬英九特別費(fèi)案”切入[J];政治與法律;2010年06期

4 溫澤彬;;論行政慣例的背景、價(jià)值與現(xiàn)狀[J];政治與法律;2010年06期

5 鄭英龍;從行政復(fù)議的價(jià)值定位看我國(guó)行政復(fù)議制度的缺陷[J];杭州商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 彭敏;行政慣例的有效性研究[D];湖北大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1623316