本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐 法律地位 連帶責(zé)任　出處：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代的到來,網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐成為一個熱門話題進(jìn)入到了人們的視野當(dāng)中,越來越多的人可以通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)進(jìn)行慈善捐助。然而,網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐帶來便利的同時,也伴隨著許多詐捐騙捐現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生。由此引發(fā)的一系列法律問題均值得我們深思,如網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者處于何種法律地位,在進(jìn)行募捐的過程中應(yīng)當(dāng)履行怎樣的義務(wù),出現(xiàn)詐捐、騙捐事件時網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺應(yīng)承擔(dān)什么樣的民事責(zé)任等問題理應(yīng)進(jìn)行深入的思考�，F(xiàn)實中,我國《慈善法》中并沒有對網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺做出相應(yīng)的義務(wù)性規(guī)定,于是學(xué)界對前述問題的觀點便具有了可爭議的空間。因此,本文嘗試從民法的角度出發(fā),對網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺的法律地位、民事義務(wù)和法律責(zé)任承擔(dān)進(jìn)行必要分析與闡述。主要內(nèi)容如下述:第一章,主要介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐的特征和兩種發(fā)起模式,即個人直接發(fā)起模式和個人與慈善組織共同發(fā)起模式,繼而引出影響網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺在民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)方面所存在的一些爭議。第二章,主要對影響網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺責(zé)任承擔(dān)的相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行梳理分析。主要包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺的法律地位,有居間人說、網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間出租者說、代理人說等,并對前述觀點進(jìn)行了闡述。隨后文章就網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺的義務(wù)方面提出自己的觀點并進(jìn)行評析,本文認(rèn)為網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺在募捐發(fā)起前或者募捐過程中應(yīng)負(fù)有相應(yīng)的審核義務(wù)和注意義務(wù)。第三章,主要對網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺單方責(zé)任之優(yōu)劣進(jìn)行了分析,隨后又對網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺應(yīng)承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的論證。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the Internet era, online fund-raising has become a hot topic into the eyes of people, more and more people can make charitable donations through the Internet. However, Internet fundraising brings convenience at the same time. With the occurrence of many fraudulent donation fraud phenomenon, a series of legal problems are worth pondering, such as the network donation platform as a network service provider in what kind of legal status. In the process of collecting donations, what kind of obligations should be fulfilled, there are fraud donation, when the network donation collection platform should bear the civil liability and other issues should be deeply considered. In reality. The charity law of our country does not have the corresponding obligation stipulation to the network collection platform, so the academic circles have the controversial space to the above-mentioned question viewpoint. Therefore, this article tries to proceed from the angle of the civil law. The legal status of the network fundraising platform, civil obligations and legal liability to undertake the necessary analysis and elaboration. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter, mainly introduces the characteristics of the network collection and the two modes of initiation. Namely the individual direct initiation mode and the individual and the charitable organization co-sponsor pattern, then leads to the influence network fund-raising platform in the civil liability assumption aspect some disputes. Chapter two. It mainly analyzes the related problems that affect the responsibility of the network fundraising platform. It mainly includes the legal status of the network fundraising platform, some people say, cyberspace renters say, agents say, and so on. Then the article puts forward its own views and comments on the obligations of the network fundraising platform. This paper thinks that the network fundraising platform should have the corresponding audit obligation and duty of attention before or during the launching of the collection. Chapter three mainly analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the unilateral responsibility of the network fundraising platform. Subsequently, the network fundraising platform should bear joint liability for a detailed demonstration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.182.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方延明;追究連帶責(zé)任[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1486597