故意泄露國家秘密罪的問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-23 21:52
【摘要】：近年來,故意泄露國家秘密的案件時有發(fā)生,給國家的安全和利益造成嚴(yán)重的損害,對社會生活秩序和國家機關(guān)正常工作秩序造成嚴(yán)重干擾和破壞。為了準(zhǔn)確適用刑法打擊此類犯罪,有必要對本罪在理論上和在司法實踐中存在的問題進行分析研究。筆者將對故意泄露國家秘密罪中爭議較大的幾個問題進行探討,提出自己的主張和觀點。本文總共分為八個部分:一、問題的提出;二、本罪犯罪主體的討論;三、關(guān)于本罪的對象“國家秘密”;四、對本罪客觀行為的探討;五、對本罪成立條件“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”的理解;六、在故意和過失的情形下,法定刑是否應(yīng)當(dāng)一致?七、關(guān)于本罪的未遂犯;八、本罪的罪數(shù)問題探討。第一部分為問題的提出。筆者首先通過案例的表述,提出關(guān)于本罪幾個具有重要意義的問題,表明本文的研究方向和意義。第二部分是對本罪犯罪主體的討論。本罪主體是一般主體還是特殊主體存在兩種對立的爭議,筆者在對兩個觀點分析評述的基礎(chǔ)上提出自己的主張,明確犯罪主體的范圍。同時,對本罪特殊主體范圍的合理性以及單位能否成為本罪主體提出自己的觀點。第三部分對本罪的對象“國家秘密”展開討論。國家秘密的認(rèn)定是區(qū)分罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的一個重要環(huán)節(jié)。筆者通過對國家秘密概念、特征、分類以及解密條件的探討,充分解讀國家秘密的知識要點,以便于對本罪的準(zhǔn)確把握。第四部分對本罪客觀行為方式的探討。具體分析了國家秘密泄露的含義以及具體的泄露方法,對以不作為泄露國家秘密的情形做了闡述。第五部分是對本罪成立條件之一“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”的理解�！扒楣�(jié)嚴(yán)重”是本罪的必要構(gòu)成要件,在司法解釋中有較為系統(tǒng)的說明,筆者在對此進行評述的基礎(chǔ)上提出了自己的主張,并對“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”包括的行為提出自己的理解。第六部分對故意和過失法定刑是否應(yīng)當(dāng)一致進行探討。首先對刑法中故意和過失處罰的基本原則進行評述,繼而對故意和過失法定刑是否應(yīng)當(dāng)一致性的問題深入討論,提出自己的觀點。第七部分關(guān)于本罪的未遂犯探討。本罪為純正情節(jié)犯,對情節(jié)犯是否存在未遂的形態(tài)學(xué)者有不同的觀點,筆者對兩個觀點分析評述并提出自己的見解,結(jié)合本罪的情況,對本罪未遂形態(tài)的構(gòu)成條件進行分析并舉例說明。第八部分對本罪的罪數(shù)形態(tài)進行探討。
[Abstract]:In recent years, cases of deliberately disclosing state secrets have occurred from time to time, causing serious damage to the security and interests of the state, and seriously disturbing and destroying the social life order and the normal working order of state organs. In order to accurately apply the criminal law to combat such crimes, it is necessary to analyze and study the problems existing in this crime in theory and in judicial practice. The author will discuss several controversial issues in the crime of intentional disclosure of state secrets, and put forward his own ideas and points of view. This paper is divided into eight parts: first, the issue of the proposed; second, the subject of the crime discussion; third, about the object of this crime "state secret"; fourth, the objective behavior of this crime; (5) the understanding of the "serious circumstances" of the conditions for the establishment of this crime; and (6) whether the statutory punishment should be consistent under the circumstances of intent and negligence? Seven, on the crime of attempted crime; eighth, the crime of the number of issues. The first part is the presentation of the problem. First of all, the author puts forward some important questions about this crime through the presentation of the case, which shows the research direction and significance of this paper. The second part is the discussion on the subject of this crime. Whether the subject of this crime is a general subject or a special subject has two opposing disputes. On the basis of analyzing and commenting on the two viewpoints, the author puts forward his own opinion and clarifies the scope of the subject of crime. At the same time, the rationality of the scope of the special subject of this crime and whether the unit can become the subject of this crime put forward their own point of view. The third part discusses the object of this crime, "State Secret". The cognizance of state secret is an important link of distinguishing crime from non-crime. Through the discussion of the concept, characteristics, classification and decryption conditions of state secrets, the author fully interprets the key points of the knowledge of state secrets, so as to facilitate the accurate grasp of this crime. The fourth part discusses the objective behavior of this crime. This paper analyzes the meaning of the leakage of state secrets and the specific leakage methods, and expounds the situation of disclosing the state secrets by omission. The fifth part is the understanding of "serious circumstances", one of the conditions for the establishment of this crime. "serious circumstances" is the essential element of the crime, and there is a systematic explanation in the judicial interpretation. On the basis of comments on this, the author puts forward his own opinion, and puts forward his own understanding of the acts included in the "serious circumstances". The sixth part discusses whether the statutory punishment of intent and negligence should be consistent. This paper first reviews the basic principles of intentional and negligent punishment in criminal law, and then discusses the consistency of intentional and negligent statutory punishment, and puts forward its own point of view. The seventh part discusses the attempted crime of this crime. This crime is a pure crime of affection. The author has different views on the existence of attempted plot crime. The author analyzes and comments on the two viewpoints and puts forward his own opinion, combining with the situation of this crime. The constitution condition of the attempted form of this crime is analyzed and illustrated with an example. The eighth part discusses the number of crimes in this crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2463828
[Abstract]:In recent years, cases of deliberately disclosing state secrets have occurred from time to time, causing serious damage to the security and interests of the state, and seriously disturbing and destroying the social life order and the normal working order of state organs. In order to accurately apply the criminal law to combat such crimes, it is necessary to analyze and study the problems existing in this crime in theory and in judicial practice. The author will discuss several controversial issues in the crime of intentional disclosure of state secrets, and put forward his own ideas and points of view. This paper is divided into eight parts: first, the issue of the proposed; second, the subject of the crime discussion; third, about the object of this crime "state secret"; fourth, the objective behavior of this crime; (5) the understanding of the "serious circumstances" of the conditions for the establishment of this crime; and (6) whether the statutory punishment should be consistent under the circumstances of intent and negligence? Seven, on the crime of attempted crime; eighth, the crime of the number of issues. The first part is the presentation of the problem. First of all, the author puts forward some important questions about this crime through the presentation of the case, which shows the research direction and significance of this paper. The second part is the discussion on the subject of this crime. Whether the subject of this crime is a general subject or a special subject has two opposing disputes. On the basis of analyzing and commenting on the two viewpoints, the author puts forward his own opinion and clarifies the scope of the subject of crime. At the same time, the rationality of the scope of the special subject of this crime and whether the unit can become the subject of this crime put forward their own point of view. The third part discusses the object of this crime, "State Secret". The cognizance of state secret is an important link of distinguishing crime from non-crime. Through the discussion of the concept, characteristics, classification and decryption conditions of state secrets, the author fully interprets the key points of the knowledge of state secrets, so as to facilitate the accurate grasp of this crime. The fourth part discusses the objective behavior of this crime. This paper analyzes the meaning of the leakage of state secrets and the specific leakage methods, and expounds the situation of disclosing the state secrets by omission. The fifth part is the understanding of "serious circumstances", one of the conditions for the establishment of this crime. "serious circumstances" is the essential element of the crime, and there is a systematic explanation in the judicial interpretation. On the basis of comments on this, the author puts forward his own opinion, and puts forward his own understanding of the acts included in the "serious circumstances". The sixth part discusses whether the statutory punishment of intent and negligence should be consistent. This paper first reviews the basic principles of intentional and negligent punishment in criminal law, and then discusses the consistency of intentional and negligent statutory punishment, and puts forward its own point of view. The seventh part discusses the attempted crime of this crime. This crime is a pure crime of affection. The author has different views on the existence of attempted plot crime. The author analyzes and comments on the two viewpoints and puts forward his own opinion, combining with the situation of this crime. The constitution condition of the attempted form of this crime is analyzed and illustrated with an example. The eighth part discusses the number of crimes in this crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 李希慧;董文輝;;論泄露國家秘密犯罪的立法完善[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年06期
2 羅勇;;論瀆職犯罪主體中的幾個問題[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年05期
3 張永紅;張萬順;;國家秘密刑法保護的完善[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年02期
4 龍文懋;;侵犯國家秘密犯罪中國家秘密的甄別問題研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期
5 王戈;;泄露國家秘密罪構(gòu)成解析[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年02期
6 張杰;;論非法獲取國家秘密罪[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期
7 楊凱;泄露國家秘密犯罪刑事司法問題檢討[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期
8 李�；�,賈濟東,廖焱清;瀆職罪主體解釋回顧及立法建言[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年04期
9 程宗璋;試論國家機關(guān)工作人員[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 羅希;泄露國家秘密犯罪研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號：2463828
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2463828.html
教材專著
