受賄罪立法研究
發(fā)布時間:2019-01-23 11:00
【摘要】:受賄罪作為一種典型的職務(wù)犯罪,古今中外都非常重視對該種犯罪的懲處。 改革開放以來,隨著我國社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展與進(jìn)步,官員腐敗問題層出不窮, 不僅給國家和人民財產(chǎn)造成巨大損失,也損害了黨和政府在人民群眾中的形象, 給正常的社會秩序帶來惡劣影響。而與此相伴的卻是法律制度的缺失和不完善, 受賄罪立法的不足之處逐漸暴露出來,導(dǎo)致雖有大批枉法官員受到懲處,但仍有 很多受賄行為因主體定性不明、受賄手段較為隱蔽而無法得到規(guī)制,使得受賄犯 罪的犯罪率一直居高不下,大量腐敗分子規(guī)避法律漏洞、損害國家利益,同時被 追究法律責(zé)任的部分案件出現(xiàn)量刑差距過大等問題,刑法調(diào)整的社會效果不理 想,嚴(yán)重阻礙了我國建設(shè)法治社會的進(jìn)程。以史為鑒,可以知興替,通過研究我 國唐代律法,筆者認(rèn)為其中有關(guān)于受賄犯罪的規(guī)定明確、詳盡,對當(dāng)時的社會而 言,可適用性很高,也取得了較好的實踐效果。他山之石,可以攻玉,通過對日 本刑法受賄罪的研究,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)其“罪名體系”的立法方面有一定科學(xué)之處,并 且二者與我國現(xiàn)代刑法在很多地方均有不同之處。筆者通過分析比較唐律、日本 刑法及我國現(xiàn)代刑法對受賄罪規(guī)定,主要從受賄罪犯罪主體的定性不明、犯罪客 觀方面規(guī)定存在的幾個缺陷、罪名與罪刑設(shè)置不合理這幾個方面指出我國立法的 不合理之處,并借鑒唐律、日本刑法在這些方面的立法,為完善我國刑事立法、 解決司法實踐困擾,提出粗淺建議。
[Abstract]:As a typical duty crime, the crime of accepting bribes attaches great importance to the punishment of this crime. Since the reform and opening up, with the continuous development and progress of our country's social economy, the problem of official corruption has emerged in endlessly, which not only caused huge losses to the property of the state and the people, but also damaged the image of the party and the government among the masses of the people. Have a bad effect on normal social order. However, this is accompanied by the lack and imperfection of the legal system, and the shortcomings of the legislation on the crime of accepting bribes are gradually exposed, which leads to the punishment of a large number of officials who pervert the law, but there are still many acts of bribery that are unclear because of the nature of the subject. Bribery means are more concealed and unable to be regulated, which makes the crime rate of bribery crime remain high. A large number of corrupt elements avoid legal loopholes and harm the national interests. At the same time, some cases which are investigated for legal responsibility have some problems such as too big sentencing gap, and the social effect of the adjustment of criminal law is ignored, which seriously hinders the process of building a society ruled by law in our country. Taking history as a mirror, we can learn from history. By studying the law of the Tang Dynasty in our country, the author believes that there are clear and detailed provisions on the crime of bribery, which are highly applicable to the society at that time. Good practical results have also been achieved. Through the research on the crime of accepting bribes in Japanese criminal law, the author finds that there are some scientific aspects in the legislation of his "charge system", and the two are different from our modern criminal law in many places. By analyzing and comparing the provisions of Tang Law, Japanese Criminal Law and China's Modern Criminal Law on the crime of accepting bribes, the author mainly analyzes the defects in the definition of the subject of the crime of accepting bribes and the view of the criminal. In order to perfect the criminal legislation and solve the problems of judicial practice, the author points out the unreasonable aspects of the crime and the setting of the crime and punishment, and draws lessons from the legislation of Tang Law and the Japanese Criminal Law in these aspects, in order to perfect the criminal legislation of our country and solve the problems in the judicial practice. Put forward some superficial suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D924.392
本文編號:2413721
[Abstract]:As a typical duty crime, the crime of accepting bribes attaches great importance to the punishment of this crime. Since the reform and opening up, with the continuous development and progress of our country's social economy, the problem of official corruption has emerged in endlessly, which not only caused huge losses to the property of the state and the people, but also damaged the image of the party and the government among the masses of the people. Have a bad effect on normal social order. However, this is accompanied by the lack and imperfection of the legal system, and the shortcomings of the legislation on the crime of accepting bribes are gradually exposed, which leads to the punishment of a large number of officials who pervert the law, but there are still many acts of bribery that are unclear because of the nature of the subject. Bribery means are more concealed and unable to be regulated, which makes the crime rate of bribery crime remain high. A large number of corrupt elements avoid legal loopholes and harm the national interests. At the same time, some cases which are investigated for legal responsibility have some problems such as too big sentencing gap, and the social effect of the adjustment of criminal law is ignored, which seriously hinders the process of building a society ruled by law in our country. Taking history as a mirror, we can learn from history. By studying the law of the Tang Dynasty in our country, the author believes that there are clear and detailed provisions on the crime of bribery, which are highly applicable to the society at that time. Good practical results have also been achieved. Through the research on the crime of accepting bribes in Japanese criminal law, the author finds that there are some scientific aspects in the legislation of his "charge system", and the two are different from our modern criminal law in many places. By analyzing and comparing the provisions of Tang Law, Japanese Criminal Law and China's Modern Criminal Law on the crime of accepting bribes, the author mainly analyzes the defects in the definition of the subject of the crime of accepting bribes and the view of the criminal. In order to perfect the criminal legislation and solve the problems of judicial practice, the author points out the unreasonable aspects of the crime and the setting of the crime and punishment, and draws lessons from the legislation of Tang Law and the Japanese Criminal Law in these aspects, in order to perfect the criminal legislation of our country and solve the problems in the judicial practice. Put forward some superficial suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D924.392
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 李潔;;日本受賄罪立法及對我國的借鑒價值[J];北方法學(xué);2007年01期
2 梁文彩;;論我國賄賂犯罪刑事立法的完善[J];甘肅科技;2009年20期
3 王晉;;我國新聞工作的公務(wù)性質(zhì)不應(yīng)否定——論記者可以構(gòu)成受賄罪主體[J];青年記者;2009年07期
4 李潔;受賄罪法條解釋與評析[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年05期
5 孫國祥;;論刑法中的國家工作人員[J];人民檢察;2013年11期
6 王毓明;;唐代懲治經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的立法與實踐[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期
7 儲槐植;;完善賄賂罪立法——兼論“罪刑系列”的立法方法[J];中國法學(xué);1992年05期
8 河南省人民檢察院課題組;瀆職犯罪主體研究[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期
9 高玉玲;;“醫(yī)藥回扣”問題的刑法學(xué)審視[J];中國衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2007年11期
,本文編號:2413721
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2413721.html
教材專著