發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-14 00:14

【摘要】：近幾年,我國非法集資類型案件頻發(fā),并且呈逐年上升趨勢,刑法對非法集資類型案件的規(guī)制也日趨嚴(yán)厲。這類現(xiàn)象的產(chǎn)生,一方面是由于民營中小型企業(yè)的融資渠道較窄,另一方面是因?yàn)樗痉▽?shí)踐中民間借貸與非法吸收公眾存款罪的界限不清、非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪的界限模糊。本文力圖依據(jù)法條和司法解釋的相關(guān)規(guī)定,論述非法吸收公眾存款罪與民間借貸之間的區(qū)別、非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪之間的區(qū)別等問題。本文的基本觀點(diǎn)是:在既有的法律前提下,應(yīng)堅(jiān)持刑法的謙抑性原則,來解決非法集資型犯罪中的罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪問題。在本文的寫作中,作者采用了規(guī)范分析、案例分析等研究方法,收集并參考了大量關(guān)于這方面的論文論著,理出了理論界對這些問題爭議的焦點(diǎn)所在。這些焦點(diǎn)問題主要包括,對于非法吸收公眾存款罪的“社會公眾”、“集資性質(zhì)”、“擾亂金融秩序”等的認(rèn)定問題,以及對于集資詐騙罪的“非法占有目的”的認(rèn)定問題,等等。在此基礎(chǔ)上,闡明自己對非法集資類型犯罪中的罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪劃分問題的基本觀點(diǎn)。作者認(rèn)為,對于非法集資類型的犯罪,之所以要堅(jiān)持刑法的謙抑性原則并遵循少殺慎殺的宗旨,主要有以下兩點(diǎn)原因:一是集資犯罪的受害人本身也有一定的過錯(cuò),其對自我招致的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)應(yīng)承擔(dān)一定的責(zé)任;二是為了拓寬民營企業(yè)的融資渠道,為民營企業(yè)的發(fā)展提供便利條件。所以,在司法實(shí)踐中,要嚴(yán)格把握非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪的犯罪特征,給民間借貸行為預(yù)留合法化空間。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the cases of illegal fund-raising type occur frequently in our country, and show an increasing trend year by year, and the regulation of illegal fund-raising type cases is becoming more and more strict in criminal law. This kind of phenomenon, on the one hand, is due to the narrow financing channels of small and medium-sized private enterprises, on the other hand, the line between private lending and the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits is not clear in judicial practice. The line between the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the crime of raising funds is blurred. According to the relevant provisions of the law and judicial interpretation, this paper tries to discuss the difference between the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and private loans, and the difference between the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the crime of fraud of raising funds, and so on. The basic point of view of this paper is: under the existing legal premise, we should adhere to the principle of modesty of criminal law to solve the problem of crime and non-crime in illegal fund-raising crime. In the writing of this paper, the author adopts normative analysis, case analysis and other research methods, collects and refers to a large number of papers on this aspect, and points out the focus of controversy on these issues in the theoretical circle. These focus issues mainly include the identification of the "social public", "the nature of raising funds", "disrupting the financial order" and so on for the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public, as well as the identification of the "purpose of illegal possession" of the crime of fund-raising fraud. Wait On this basis, the author expounds his basic views on the crime and non-crime in the type of illegal fund-raising, and the division between the crime and the crime. The author believes that there are two main reasons why we should adhere to the principle of modesty in criminal law and follow the aim of killing less and killing carefully for the crime of illegally raising funds: first, the victims of the crime of raising funds also have certain mistakes. They should bear certain responsibility for the risks incurred by themselves; Second, in order to broaden the financing channels of private enterprises, private enterprises to provide convenient conditions for the development. Therefore, in the judicial practice, we should strictly grasp the criminal characteristics of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the crime of financing fraud, and reserve legalized space for private borrowing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.33

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 肖晚祥;;非法吸收公眾存款罪的司法認(rèn)定研究[J];東方法學(xué);2010年05期

2 張明楷;論財(cái)產(chǎn)罪的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2005年05期

3 李振林;;刑法規(guī)制非法集資限度問題研究[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2012年04期

，

本文編號：2377526