發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-12 18:05

【摘要】：教唆犯相關(guān)問題是刑法理論中的難點(diǎn),有關(guān)教唆犯的理論爭(zhēng)議也是無處不在,以至于有學(xué)者將其稱之為刑法中的“幽暗地帶”、“絕望之章”。在教唆犯理論的諸多爭(zhēng)議中,有關(guān)教唆未遂的爭(zhēng)議尤為突出。爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)主要在于對(duì)教唆犯性質(zhì)的不同認(rèn)識(shí)以及對(duì)我國(guó)《刑法》第29條第2款之規(guī)定的不同理解上。鑒于此,筆者嘗試以共同犯罪理論和犯罪未完成形態(tài)理論為依據(jù),對(duì)教唆未遂的認(rèn)定問題進(jìn)行研究,以期為刑法理論界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界產(chǎn)生借鑒意義。教唆未遂理論是共同犯罪理論與犯罪未完成形態(tài)理論的交叉和融合,對(duì)教唆未遂的研究,不能脫離共同犯罪的整體框架,同時(shí)也要緊密結(jié)合犯罪未完成形態(tài)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。本文主要研究了與教唆未遂的認(rèn)定密切相關(guān)的教唆犯的性質(zhì)、教唆未遂的可罰性、教唆未遂的具體認(rèn)定、我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法的相關(guān)規(guī)定等問題。首先,從正犯與共犯的關(guān)系入手,在二元區(qū)分的體系下,探討了教唆犯的性質(zhì),論證了教唆犯從屬性說的合理性。然后,分析了教唆犯的可罰性與未遂犯的可罰性,在此基礎(chǔ)上,探討了教唆未遂的可罰性。再后,根據(jù)教唆犯的性質(zhì)和教唆未遂的可罰性,結(jié)合犯罪未遂理論,梳理了教唆未遂的概念并提出了認(rèn)定教唆未遂的具體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。最后,對(duì)我國(guó)《刑法》第29條第2款之規(guī)定進(jìn)行了解讀,并提出了該規(guī)定存在的問題及完善建議。
[Abstract]:The related problem of abettor is a difficult point in the theory of criminal law, and the theoretical controversy about abettor is also ubiquitous, so some scholars call it the "dark zone" and "the chapter of despair" in criminal law. Among the many controversies in the theory of abettor, the controversy about attempted abettor is particularly prominent. The focus of the controversy lies in the different understanding of the nature of the abettor and the different understanding of the provisions of Article 29 (2) of the Criminal Law of China. In view of this, the author tries to study the identification of attempted abettor on the basis of the theory of joint crime and the theory of incomplete form of crime, in order to produce reference significance for the theoretical circle of criminal law and judicial practice. The theory of attempted abetment is the intersection and fusion between the theory of joint crime and the theory of incomplete form of crime. The study of attempted abetment can not be separated from the whole frame of joint crime, but also closely combined with the related contents of the form of uncompleted crime. This paper mainly studies the nature of the abettor who is closely related to the identification of the attempted abettor, the punishment of the attempted abettor, the concrete determination of the attempted abettor, and the relevant provisions of the current legislation of our country. First, starting with the relationship between principal offender and accomplice, this paper discusses the nature of abettor and proves the rationality of the theory of accessory attribute of abettor. Then, this paper analyzes the penalty of abettor and attempted offense, and discusses the penalization of attempted abettor. Then, according to the nature of the abettor and the penalty of the attempted abettor, combined with the theory of attempted crime, this paper combs the concept of the attempted abettor and puts forward the concrete standard to identify the attempted abettor. Finally, the article 29, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Law of our country is interpreted, and the problems existing in the provision and the suggestions for its perfection are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 趙秉志;魏東;;論教唆犯的未遂──兼議新刑法第29條第2款[J];法學(xué)家;1999年03期

2 肖本山;;“教唆未遂”詮釋新解——關(guān)于體系性解釋和目的解釋方法的適用[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年05期

3 何慶仁;我國(guó)刑法中教唆犯的兩種涵義[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年05期

4 郭園園;論教唆未遂與未遂教唆——以我國(guó)《刑法》第29條第2款的解讀為中心[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2375050