論以危險方法危害公共安全罪的司法認(rèn)定
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-18 14:26
【摘要】：本文研究的是以危險方法危害公共安全罪的司法認(rèn)定。以危險方法危害公共安全罪屬于我國刑法第二章的罪名。由于刑法條文對本罪中公共安全、危險方法、危險狀態(tài)、間接故意的規(guī)定表述過于簡單和抽象，模棱兩可，導(dǎo)致本罪在理解上有逐漸寬泛化和適用中逐漸泛濫化的現(xiàn)象。筆者通過此論文，對該罪的特定要件進(jìn)行觀點(diǎn)評析和限制解釋，以防止該罪出現(xiàn)口袋化的趨勢。 本篇論文共分為四個部分：第一部分是對公共安全進(jìn)行的司法認(rèn)定。通過“碰瓷案件”，引出國內(nèi)外公共安全的觀點(diǎn)并進(jìn)行評析，界定了公共安全的范圍和內(nèi)容，厘清了公共安全中“不特定”和“多數(shù)人”的關(guān)系。最后筆者得出結(jié)論，，刑法意義上的公共安全為多數(shù)人或者不特定人的生命、身體或者重大公私財產(chǎn)安全。第二部分是對危險方法進(jìn)行的司法認(rèn)定，通過“瘦肉精”一案，引出對危險方法內(nèi)容和性質(zhì)的觀點(diǎn)并進(jìn)行評析。指出危險方法只應(yīng)該限定與放火等四種行為相當(dāng)?shù)姆椒�，排除刑法其他已有專門明文規(guī)定的危害行為；而危險相當(dāng)性作為危險方法的性質(zhì)，就是有可能侵害公共安全的危害結(jié)果和現(xiàn)實(shí)可能性，它具有直接性、獨(dú)立性、一次性等特征。第三部分是對危險狀態(tài)進(jìn)行的司法認(rèn)定。通過“肖永靈郵寄虛假炭疽桿菌”一案，引出該罪是何種危險犯以及對該罪危險狀態(tài)的觀點(diǎn)并進(jìn)行評析。得出本罪屬于具體危險犯，其危險狀態(tài)既包括一行為的實(shí)施所造成的客觀損失后果，又包括危害行為所轉(zhuǎn)化成的現(xiàn)實(shí)危險，即有對本罪的法益造成威脅或向現(xiàn)實(shí)危險發(fā)展的可能性和緊迫性。最后詳細(xì)闡述了符合本罪危險狀態(tài)所必備的影響因素，即客觀性、法律性、可期待性、現(xiàn)實(shí)可能性。第四部分是對間接故意進(jìn)行的司法認(rèn)定。通過“孫偉銘”一案，引出對間接故意的不同觀點(diǎn)及評析，界定間接故意的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，闡述對認(rèn)識因素“明知可能”和意志因素“放任”的具體理解，提出不同案件的主觀罪過要根據(jù)具體情況和各個證據(jù)進(jìn)行綜合分析的觀點(diǎn)。 由于在司法實(shí)踐中，本罪逐漸出現(xiàn)了濫用的態(tài)勢，所以在本篇論文中，筆者從大量典型的真實(shí)發(fā)生的實(shí)踐案例入手，從四種不同角度分別思考了“以危險方法危害公共安全罪”如何在司法實(shí)踐中得到正確的界定與運(yùn)用，展開了對以危險方法危害公共安全罪的研究。結(jié)合自己的理解，對理論觀點(diǎn)和案例進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析。以使得可以合理理解和準(zhǔn)確把握以危險方法危害公共安全罪的司法認(rèn)定。
[Abstract]:This article studies the judicial determination of the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods. The crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means belongs to the second chapter of our criminal law. Because the provisions of the criminal law on public safety, dangerous methods, dangerous state, indirect intent are too simple and abstract, ambiguous, resulting in this crime in the understanding of the gradually broad and the application of the phenomenon of flooding. Through this paper, the author analyzes and explains the specific elements of the crime in order to prevent the crime from becoming pocket. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part is the judicial cognizance of public security. Through the case of "touching porcelain", this paper draws the point of view of public safety at home and abroad and evaluates it, defines the scope and content of public security, and clarifies the relationship between "non-specific" and "majority" in public security. Finally, the author draws a conclusion that the public security in criminal law is the life, body or important public and private property safety of most or no specific people. The second part is the judicial cognizance of the dangerous method, through the case of "lean meat essence", the viewpoint of the content and nature of the dangerous method is elicited and evaluated. It is pointed out that the dangerous method should only limit the four kinds of behavior which are equivalent to arson, and exclude other harmful acts which have been specifically stipulated in the criminal law. As the nature of dangerous method, hazard equivalence is the result and possibility of harming public safety. It has the characteristics of directness, independence and one-off. The third part is the judicial determination of the dangerous state. Through the case of Shao Yongling mailing false Bacillus anthracis, the author points out what kind of dangerous crime the crime is and the dangerous state of the crime. It is concluded that this crime is a specific dangerous crime, and its dangerous state includes both the objective loss and consequences caused by the implementation of an act, and the actual danger transformed by the harmful act. That is to say, there is the possibility and urgency of threatening the legal interests of this crime or developing to the real danger. Finally, the necessary influencing factors of the dangerous state of the crime, namely objectivity, legality, expectability and realistic possibility, are expounded in detail. The fourth part is the judicial cognizance of indirect intention. Through the case of Sun Weiming, this paper draws out different viewpoints and comments on indirect intention, defines the criterion of indirect intention, and expounds the concrete understanding of the cognitive factor "knowing the possibility" and the will factor "laissez-faire". This paper puts forward the viewpoint that subjective guilt of different cases should be analyzed synthetically according to concrete situation and evidence. Due to the abuse of this crime in judicial practice, the author starts with a large number of typical real practice cases in this paper. From four different angles, this paper considers how to define and apply the crime of endangering public security by dangerous method in judicial practice, and studies the crime of endangering public security by dangerous method. Combined with their own understanding, theoretical views and cases are analyzed in detail. In order to make a reasonable understanding and accurate grasp of dangerous methods of endangering public security crimes judicial determination.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.32
本文編號：2340284
[Abstract]:This article studies the judicial determination of the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods. The crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means belongs to the second chapter of our criminal law. Because the provisions of the criminal law on public safety, dangerous methods, dangerous state, indirect intent are too simple and abstract, ambiguous, resulting in this crime in the understanding of the gradually broad and the application of the phenomenon of flooding. Through this paper, the author analyzes and explains the specific elements of the crime in order to prevent the crime from becoming pocket. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part is the judicial cognizance of public security. Through the case of "touching porcelain", this paper draws the point of view of public safety at home and abroad and evaluates it, defines the scope and content of public security, and clarifies the relationship between "non-specific" and "majority" in public security. Finally, the author draws a conclusion that the public security in criminal law is the life, body or important public and private property safety of most or no specific people. The second part is the judicial cognizance of the dangerous method, through the case of "lean meat essence", the viewpoint of the content and nature of the dangerous method is elicited and evaluated. It is pointed out that the dangerous method should only limit the four kinds of behavior which are equivalent to arson, and exclude other harmful acts which have been specifically stipulated in the criminal law. As the nature of dangerous method, hazard equivalence is the result and possibility of harming public safety. It has the characteristics of directness, independence and one-off. The third part is the judicial determination of the dangerous state. Through the case of Shao Yongling mailing false Bacillus anthracis, the author points out what kind of dangerous crime the crime is and the dangerous state of the crime. It is concluded that this crime is a specific dangerous crime, and its dangerous state includes both the objective loss and consequences caused by the implementation of an act, and the actual danger transformed by the harmful act. That is to say, there is the possibility and urgency of threatening the legal interests of this crime or developing to the real danger. Finally, the necessary influencing factors of the dangerous state of the crime, namely objectivity, legality, expectability and realistic possibility, are expounded in detail. The fourth part is the judicial cognizance of indirect intention. Through the case of Sun Weiming, this paper draws out different viewpoints and comments on indirect intention, defines the criterion of indirect intention, and expounds the concrete understanding of the cognitive factor "knowing the possibility" and the will factor "laissez-faire". This paper puts forward the viewpoint that subjective guilt of different cases should be analyzed synthetically according to concrete situation and evidence. Due to the abuse of this crime in judicial practice, the author starts with a large number of typical real practice cases in this paper. From four different angles, this paper considers how to define and apply the crime of endangering public security by dangerous method in judicial practice, and studies the crime of endangering public security by dangerous method. Combined with their own understanding, theoretical views and cases are analyzed in detail. In order to make a reasonable understanding and accurate grasp of dangerous methods of endangering public security crimes judicial determination.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.32
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉憲權(quán);;處理高危駕車肇事案件的應(yīng)然標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué);2009年09期
2 李旖旎;;交通肇事罪與以危險方法危害公共安全罪之辨析[J];法制與社會;2009年34期
3 黃維智;葉銳;;淺析以危險方法危害公共安全罪[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期
4 王東海;;危害公共安全罪中“危險方法”的司法認(rèn)定[J];廣西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2012年03期
5 李雪君;;淺析以危險的方法危害公共安全罪[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2013年06期
6 黃東平;;以危險方法危害公共安全罪之界定[J];懷化學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年04期
7 譚紹木,黃秋生;“以危險方法危害公共安全罪”中“危險方法”的展開[J];南昌航空工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期
8 孟慶華;王法;;孫偉銘醉酒駕車案的定性問題探析[J];南陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年08期
9 曲新久;;論刑法中的“公共安全”[J];人民檢察;2010年09期
10 孫萬懷;;以危險方法危害公共安全罪何以成為口袋罪[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2010年05期
本文編號：2340284
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2340284.html
教材專著
