【摘要】：在全球廢除死刑的浪潮下,積極探索死刑替代措施成為刑法學(xué)界面臨的艱巨挑戰(zhàn)。我國在《刑法修正案(九)》中提出的死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度是繼《刑法修正案(八)》死緩限制減刑后又一重要的死刑替代措施。隨著死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的設(shè)立,對該制度的研究成為學(xué)術(shù)焦點。如死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度能否替代死刑,死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度本身的價值取向和價值定位以及死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度在司法實務(wù)中如何適用等問題。筆者立足于死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度已經(jīng)設(shè)立的立場,通過五個章節(jié)的布局,用4萬余字對以上相關(guān)進行了論述。具體如下:文章第一部分為死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的概述。主要通過對死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的立法背景介紹、探討死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的概念和本質(zhì),將死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度與死緩限制減刑制度和無期徒刑進行比較,從理論上先對死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度勾畫出大體輪廓。文章第二部分為死緩終身監(jiān)禁措施的價值審視,死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度其本質(zhì)依然是刑罰的執(zhí)行措施,刑罰作為刑法的有機組成部分應(yīng)當(dāng)符合刑法的基本價值取向—正義。筆者將從死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度是否能能夠滿足報應(yīng)論的要求,以及從死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度是否能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)一般預(yù)防和個別預(yù)防功能出發(fā)進行探討,研究死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的正義性。文章第三部分為死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的規(guī)范解讀,死緩終身監(jiān)禁措施作為對死刑的立即執(zhí)行的替代性措施,筆者主要從死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度適用需用條件和訴訟時效角度出發(fā),旨在研究死緩終身監(jiān)禁措施的法律定位和司法適用。文章第四部分為死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度的執(zhí)行,監(jiān)獄作為監(jiān)禁刑的主要執(zhí)行場所,應(yīng)當(dāng)正確處理終身監(jiān)禁制度對監(jiān)獄行刑帶來新的挑戰(zhàn);筆者從死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度規(guī)范本身的不認道性、行刑理念沖突和在行刑中可能存在的問題三個角度出發(fā),對死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度在監(jiān)獄行刑中存在問題進行了分析。文章第五部分筆者主要根據(jù)死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度存在缺陷和問題,結(jié)合第四部分分析基礎(chǔ)上提出死緩終身監(jiān)禁制度在立法層面、司法層面和刑罰行刑層面予以完善的建議。
[Abstract]:Under the tide of abolishing the death penalty in the world, actively exploring the alternative measures of death penalty has become a formidable challenge in the field of criminal law. The death penalty reprieve system proposed by our country in the Criminal Law Amendment (9) is an important alternative to the death penalty after the death penalty Amendment (8) which limits the commutation of death sentence. With the establishment of death-suspended life-imprisonment system, the research of this system has become the academic focus. Such as whether the death penalty can replace the death penalty, the value orientation and value orientation of the death penalty life imprisonment system and how to apply the death penalty life imprisonment system in the judicial practice and so on. Based on the stand that the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system has been set up, through the layout of five chapters, the author discusses the above correlation with more than 40,000 words. Specific as follows: the first part of the article is the summary of life imprisonment system. By introducing the legislative background of death reprieve life imprisonment system, this paper probes into the concept and essence of death reprieve life imprisonment system, and compares the death penalty suspension life imprisonment system with the death penalty limitation commutation system and life imprisonment system. In theory, the system of suspended life imprisonment is outlined. The second part of the article is to examine the value of the measure of life imprisonment. The essence of the system is still the execution of penalty. As an organic part of criminal law, penalty should conform to the basic value orientation of criminal law-justice. The author will discuss whether the system of life imprisonment can satisfy the demand of retribution and whether the system of life imprisonment can realize the function of general prevention and individual prevention, and study the justice of the system of life imprisonment. The third part of the article is the normative interpretation of the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system, the death penalty suspended life imprisonment measures as an alternative to the immediate execution of the death penalty, the author mainly from the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system applicable to the need for conditions and the perspective of the statute of limitations. The purpose of this paper is to study the legal orientation and judicial application of the measure of suspended life imprisonment. The fourth part of the article is the execution of the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system. As the main place of execution, the prison should correctly deal with the new challenges to the prison execution brought by the life imprisonment system. The author analyzes the problems of the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system in prison execution from three angles: the denial of the norms of life imprisonment system itself, the conflict of execution concept and the possible problems in the execution of death penalty. The fifth part of the article mainly according to the death penalty life imprisonment system defects and problems, combined with the fourth part of the analysis on the basis of the death penalty life imprisonment system in the legislative level, judicial level and penalty level to improve the recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張訓(xùn);;死刑和終身監(jiān)禁的效益考量[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年20期

2 石雨堂;;偷一塊餅可判終身監(jiān)禁[J];晚報文萃;2014年02期

3 張?zhí)锟?;殘殺妓女兇手被判終身監(jiān)禁[J];民主與法制;2008年16期

4 石雨堂;;偷幾塊餅也能判終身監(jiān)禁[J];大科技(百科新說);2013年05期

5 張芳;;寵物狗咬死人 主人被判終身監(jiān)禁[J];政府法制;2008年23期

6 劉鵬;;83歲納粹獄卒被判終身監(jiān)禁[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2008年05期

7 王漢塘;;試論我國刑法增設(shè)終身監(jiān)禁之必要——由賴昌星案所想到的[J];法制與社會;2007年11期

8 李立豐;;青少年刑罰的科學(xué)建構(gòu):以美國青少年終身監(jiān)禁不得假釋實踐為視角[J];青少年犯罪問題;2012年04期

9 ;越南最大貪污案宣判——6人被判死刑6人被判終身監(jiān)禁[J];東南亞縱橫;1999年04期

10 向紫容;;新加坡:反貪官員“監(jiān)守自盜”[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2013年17期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 中國社會科學(xué)院法學(xué)所研究員 劉仁文;“終身監(jiān)禁”并不等于在監(jiān)獄中度余生[N];法制日報;2008年

2 林吉　馬曉媛;酒駕換來終身監(jiān)禁[N];人民日報海外版;2010年

3 ;哈馬斯要員在以色列 被判數(shù)十個終身監(jiān)禁[N];新華每日電訊;2012年

4 鄢烈山;“終身監(jiān)禁”不能代替死刑[N];中國商報;2004年

5 最高人民法院 何帆;誰有權(quán)剝奪孩子們的未來[N];人民法院報;2010年

6 鄧清波;“終身監(jiān)禁”亦是反腐良方[N];人民代表報;2006年

7 ;本·拉丹前“媒體主管”被判處終身監(jiān)禁[N];新華每日電訊;2008年

8 記者 余曉葵;美囚禁三名少女嫌犯被判終身監(jiān)禁[N];光明日報;2013年

9 林昊;槍殺南加大中國學(xué)生，，一嫌犯終身監(jiān)禁[N];新華每日電訊;2014年

10 記者張利;韓大邱地鐵縱火犯被判終身監(jiān)禁[N];人民日報;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張浩;終身監(jiān)禁的中國實踐與刑罰改革[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 嚴玉婷;終身監(jiān)禁制度的探究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

3 華萬明;終身監(jiān)禁存在的問題及立法完善研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

4 鮑海龍;受賄罪定罪量刑若干問題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

5 廖嘉成;論我國終身監(jiān)禁的定性與適用[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2016年

6 董如茵;終身監(jiān)禁在我國立法及司法適用中的完善[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2016年

7 卞燕飛;貪污罪、受賄罪終身監(jiān)禁制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

8 毛亞丙;我國終身監(jiān)禁制度若干問題研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2016年

9 孫文釗;終身監(jiān)禁的擴大化適用研究[D];河南大學(xué);2016年

10 牛穎莉;終身監(jiān)禁制度研究[D];安徽財經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

本文編號：2208851