【摘要】：《刑法》第286條之一拒不履行網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全管理義務(wù)罪體現(xiàn)了我國(guó)完善信息權(quán)刑法保護(hù)機(jī)制的努力。它所創(chuàng)設(shè)的,是網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者應(yīng)承擔(dān)、作為刑事作為義務(wù)的"網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息安全保護(hù)義務(wù)",而非作為行政管理義務(wù)的"信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全管理義務(wù)"。依照刑法規(guī)范明確性的要求,此義務(wù)核心內(nèi)涵應(yīng)為網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息安全保護(hù)。為了避免義務(wù)邊界不明的法治風(fēng)險(xiǎn),應(yīng)當(dāng)以刑法教義學(xué)的規(guī)范判斷為準(zhǔn)繩,對(duì)其進(jìn)行限縮解釋。以具體義務(wù)類型為依據(jù),以義務(wù)主體為前提,以法益保護(hù)目的為指引,以履行義務(wù)的可能性為保障,可以明晰此"網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息安全保護(hù)義務(wù)"的邊界,有效限制本罪處罰范圍。
[Abstract]:The crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of network security management in Article 286 of the Criminal Law embodies our country's efforts to perfect the criminal law protection mechanism of the right to information. What it creates is that network service providers should undertake "network information security protection obligations" as criminal obligations, not "information network security management obligations" as administrative obligations. According to the requirement of clarity of criminal law, the core content of this obligation should be network information security protection. In order to avoid the legal risk of unclear boundary of obligation, the criterion of dogmatics of criminal law should be taken as the criterion, and the limitation and contraction should be interpreted. Based on the specific obligation types, the subject of the obligation as the premise, the purpose of legal interest protection as the guide and the possibility of fulfilling the obligation as the guarantee, the boundary of this "obligation to protect network information security" can be clearly defined, and the scope of punishment for this crime can be effectively restricted.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;德國(guó)弗萊堡大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年國(guó)家建設(shè)高水平大學(xué)生派研究生項(xiàng)目(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):CSCNO.201606270181)
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 侯騰飛;拒不履行信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全管理義務(wù)罪研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：2202269