【摘要】：近年來(lái),網(wǎng)絡(luò)上頻頻曝光的虐童事件使兒童合法權(quán)益的保護(hù)又重新回到了輿論的中心。我國(guó)虐童事件的頻發(fā),反映出我國(guó)相關(guān)法律體制的不完善,現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)對(duì)有些虐童行為懲治力度不夠,甚至對(duì)某些情節(jié)嚴(yán)重的虐童行為地處罰還存在立法空白。兒童作為國(guó)家的未來(lái)和希望,對(duì)一個(gè)國(guó)家和社會(huì)的發(fā)展起著至關(guān)重要的作用,理應(yīng)得到我們更多的關(guān)心和愛(ài)護(hù),對(duì)于愈演愈烈的虐童事件,我們應(yīng)予以嚴(yán)厲打擊,對(duì)虐童行為從嚴(yán)入刑,切實(shí)保障兒童的合法權(quán)益。在虐童行為入刑的問(wèn)題上,我國(guó)目前的學(xué)術(shù)界和司法實(shí)踐中主要有三種路徑選擇：修改虐待罪擴(kuò)大其主體范圍,適用故意傷害罪將心理傷害納入到傷害罪的保護(hù)法益中和設(shè)立獨(dú)立的虐待兒童罪。這三種路徑選擇均有其優(yōu)點(diǎn)和缺陷,引起了不小的爭(zhēng)論。在本文中,筆者在文章的第一部分先列舉了反映我國(guó)虐童行為現(xiàn)狀的一些統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)和我國(guó)實(shí)際發(fā)生的典型案例,結(jié)合我國(guó)的這些實(shí)際情況并依據(jù)虐童行為侵害方式和主體的不同對(duì)虐童行為作出了相應(yīng)的類(lèi)型劃分,最后歸納總結(jié)出我國(guó)法律法規(guī)對(duì)虐童行為的規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀。在第二部分以虐童行為犯罪化的必要性和可行性作為犯罪化的兩大依據(jù),在必要性中主要論述了虐童行為嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)危害性,處罰虐童行為符合刑法的目的性和現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)對(duì)虐童行為規(guī)制的漏洞；在可行性中主要論述了域外立法的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)于虐童入刑堅(jiān)實(shí)的民意基礎(chǔ)和較強(qiáng)的立法儲(chǔ)備以及其在司法實(shí)踐中的可操作性。在文章的第三部分中主要論述了我們上述提到的三種虐童行為的規(guī)制路徑,通過(guò)對(duì)每種路徑適用依據(jù)和缺陷的對(duì)比得出最有利于懲治我國(guó)虐童行為的刑法路徑：設(shè)立獨(dú)立的虐待兒童罪。在文章的第四部分提出了筆者對(duì)于設(shè)立獨(dú)立的虐待兒童罪的構(gòu)想,在這一部分先對(duì)虐待兒童罪的犯罪構(gòu)成四要件進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡述,然后參考相關(guān)罪名對(duì)其刑罰進(jìn)行設(shè)置并提出了應(yīng)增設(shè)新的資格刑來(lái)更好地懲治虐童行為的施虐方,降低其再犯的幾率。當(dāng)然,對(duì)于虐童行為的規(guī)制和兒童權(quán)利的保護(hù),僅僅依靠法律的手段還遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠,其需要我們?nèi)鐣?huì)的共同努力,多管齊下,讓孩子們?cè)谒{(lán)天下健康快樂(lè)的成長(zhǎng)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, child abuse has been frequently exposed on the Internet, bringing the protection of children's legitimate rights and interests back to the center of public opinion. The frequent occurrence of child abuse incidents in China reflects the imperfection of the relevant legal system in our country. The existing laws and regulations do not punish some child abuse acts sufficiently, and there is still a legislative gap in the punishment of some serious child abuse acts. As the future and hope of a country, children play a vital role in the development of a country and society. They deserve more attention and love from us, and we should severely combat the growing incidence of child abuse. To severely punish child abuse and ensure the legitimate rights and interests of children. On the issue of criminal abuse of child abuse, there are mainly three ways in our country's current academic and judicial practice: to modify the crime of abuse to expand the scope of its subject, Apply the crime of intentional injury to incorporate psychological injury into the law of injury and establish an independent crime of child abuse. These three kinds of path choices have their advantages and disadvantages, which has caused a lot of controversy. In this paper, in the first part of the article, the author lists some statistical data that reflect the current situation of child abuse in China and typical cases of actual occurrence in China. According to the actual situation of our country and according to the different ways and subjects of child abuse behavior, this paper makes a corresponding classification of child abuse behavior. Finally, it summarizes the current situation of the regulation of child abuse behavior in China's laws and regulations. In the second part, the necessity and feasibility of criminalizing child abuse are taken as the basis of the crime. In the necessity, the author mainly discusses the serious social harm of child abuse. The punishment of child abuse is in line with the purpose of criminal law and the loopholes of existing laws and regulations on child abuse. In our country, we have a solid public opinion base and strong legislative reserve for child abuse and its maneuverability in judicial practice. In the third part of the article, we mainly discuss the regulation path of the three kinds of child abuse mentioned above. Through the comparison of the applicable basis and defects of each path, the criminal law path of punishing child abuse in our country is obtained, which is the establishment of independent child abuse crime. In the fourth part of the article, the author puts forward the idea of establishing an independent crime of child abuse. In this part, the author expounds in detail the four elements of the crime of child abuse. Then the author sets up the penalty with reference to the related charges and puts forward that a new qualification penalty should be added to punish the abuser of child abuse better and reduce the probability of reoffending. Of course, the regulation of child abuse behavior and the protection of children's rights is far from enough to rely on the means of law, it needs the joint efforts of the whole society, multi-pronged, so that children can grow up healthily and happily under the blue sky.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.34

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年04期

2 皮藝軍;;“虐童”淺析[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2013年01期

3 馬濤;;論校園“虐童”行為的法律規(guī)制——兼評(píng)增設(shè)虐待兒童罪之主張[J];研究生法學(xué);2012年06期

4 徐文文;趙秉志;;關(guān)于虐待罪立法完善問(wèn)題的研討——兼論虐童行為的犯罪化[J];法治研究;2013年03期

5 彭夫;;兒童保護(hù)的刑法難題及解決路徑——以溫嶺虐童事件為例[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年06期

6 任海濤;張思遠(yuǎn);;虐童行為的刑法理論分析——兼論“虐童罪”不宜成為獨(dú)立罪名[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2013年02期

7 楊曉雨;;從虐童案看虐待罪的立法完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2013年02期

8 于改之;;兒童虐待的法律規(guī)制——以日本法為視角的分析[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年03期

9 張明楷;新刑法與法益侵害說(shuō)[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年01期

10 武曉紅;王簫桐;;虐童行為入罪的必要性之探析[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2200018